Supply chain management in SMEs: evidence from Poland and Kazakhstan

Open access


The research aimed to assess Supply Chain Management (SCM) in small and medium enterprises in Kazakhstan and Poland, and, more specifically, identify similarities and differences in the approach to the SCM concept in selected countries. The research methodology was based on ANOVA analysis comparing samples of contemporary SMEs operating in Poland and Kazakhstan. Primary data was collected using the CAWI quantitative method and then studied using the ANOVA statistical data analysis method. The research results demonstrated similar involvement in the implementation of the concept with significant differences in some areas, such as cost reduction and focus on end customers. The concept of Supply Chain Management is a very common subject of theoretical and practical analysis. Even though research efforts in this area indicate the positive effects of the implemented concept, most of them concern large organisations. The research results showed similar involvement in the implementation of the concept, although significant differences were found in selected areas, such as cost reduction and focus on end customers.

If the inline PDF is not rendering correctly, you can download the PDF file here.

  • Anikin B. A. (2010). Logistics. Moscow Russia: Prospect Publishing.

  • Arend R. J. & Wisner J. D. (2005). Small business and supply chain management: is there a fit? Journal of Business Venturing20(3) 403-436.

  • Bohušová H. & Svoboda P. (2017). Biological Assets: Impact of Measurement on Financial Position and Performance of SMEs. Forum Scientiae Oeconomia5(1) 19-31.

  • Dolado J. J. & Lütkepohl H. (1996). Making Wald Test Work for Cointegrated VAR Systems. Econometric Reviews15(4) 369-386.

  • Dybskaya V. V. (2013). Logistics. Moscow Russia: Eksmo Publishing.

  • Jones P. (2011). ICT impact within the SME sector. Journal of Systems and Information Technology13(2). doi: 10.1108/jsit.2011.36513baa.001

  • Kisperska-Moroń D. Klosa E. Świerczek A. & Liniecki R. (2010). Funkcjonowanie małych i średnich firm produkcyjnych w łańcuchu dostaw [Functioning of small and medium production companies in the supply chain]. Katowice Poland: Wydawnictwo Uniwersytetu Ekonomicznego w Katowicach.

  • Kljucnikov A. Belas J. Kozubikova L. & Pasekova P. (2016). The Entrepreneurial Perception of SME Business Environment Quality in the Czech Republic. Journal of Competitiveness8(1) 66-78.

  • Koładkiewicz I. (2013). The second generation in a family business: an agent of change or continuator of family tradition? Journal of Technology Management in China8(3) 155-173. doi: 10.1108/JTMC-07-2013-0032

  • Kovács G. & Kot S. (2016). New logistics and production trends as the effect of global economy changes. Polish Journal of Management Studies14(2) 115-126.

  • Kozubikova L. Homolka L. & Kristalas D. (2017). The Effect of Business Environment and Entrepreneurs’ Gender on Perception of Financial Risk in the SMSs Sector. Journal of Competitiveness9(1) 36-50.

  • Kurganov V. M. (2013). Efficiency of logistics and competitiveness of Russia. Transport of Russian Federation1(44) 19-23.

  • Leończuk D. Ryciuk U. Szymczak M. & Nazarko J. (2019). Measuring Performance of Adaptive Supply Chains. In A. Kawa A. Maryniak (Eds.) SMART Supply Network. EcoProduction. Environmental Issues in Logistics and Manufacturing (pp. 89-110). Cham Switzerland: Springer International Publishing. doi: 10.1007/978-3-319-91668-2_5

  • Liberko I. Bednarová L. Hajduová Z. & Chovancová J. (2015). Possibilities to optimize the logistics chain in the manufacturing plant. Polish Journal of Management Studies12(2) 103-113.

  • OECD. (2009). Top barriers and drivers to SME internationalisation. Paris France: OECD.

  • Oracle. (2016). IDG Connect Report. Retrived from

  • Pietrasieński P. & Ślusarczyk B. (2015). Internationalization of small and medium enterprises – Empirical research review on barriers to entry into foreign markets. Polish Journal of Management Studies11(1) 113-123.

  • Romanko E. B. & Musabekova A. O. (2014). Development of Transport Logistics in the Republic of Kazakhstan. Retrived from

  • Sergeyev V. I. (2001). Logistics in Business. Moscow Russia: Alfa-Press.

  • Sterligova A. N. (2014). Logistics. Integrating and Optimizing Business Processes in Supply Chains. Moscow Russia: Prospect Publishing.

  • Thakkar J. Kanda A. & Deshmukh S. G. (2008). Supply chain management in SMEs: development of constructs and propositions. Asia Pacific Journal of Marketing and Logistics20(1) 97-131.

  • Thakkar J. Kanda A. & Deshmukh S. G. (2011). Mapping of supply chain learning: a framework for SMEs. The Learning Organization18(4) 313-332.

  • Thompson P. & Zang W. (2015). Foreign direct investment and the SME sector. International Journal of Entrepreneurial Behavior & Research21(1) 50-75. doi: 10.1108/IJEBR-12-2013-0218

  • Tvaronavičienė M. Razminienė K. & Piccinetti L. (2015). Aproaches towards cluster analysis. Economics and Sociology8(1) 19-27.

  • Vasiliu C. & Dobrea M. (2013). State of implementation of Supply Chain Management in companies in Romania. Amfiteatru Economic15(33) 180-196.

  • Wright R. (2013). Supply Chain Strategies of Manufacturers in Romania. International Journal of Applied Management Science5(1) 80-99.

  • Yergaliyeva R. & Raimbekova Z. (2016). The Development of the Logistics System of Kazakhstan as a Factor in Increasing its Competitiveness. Procedia Economics and Finance39 71-75.

  • Zhussupova Z. Onyusheva I. & El-Hodiri M. (2018). Corporate governance and firm value of Kazakhstani companies in the conditions of economic instability. Polish Journal of Management Studies17(2) 235-245.

  • Zowada K. (2011). Logistyczne aspekty funkcjonowania małych i średnich przedsiębiorstw [Logistic aspects of the functioning of small and medium enterprises]. In A. Adamik (Ed.) Kształtowanie konkurencyjności i przewagi konkurencyjnej małych i średnich przedsiębiorstw [Shaping the competitiveness and competitive advantage of small and medium enterprises] (pp. 160-169). Warszawa Poland: C. H. Beck.

Journal information
Impact Factor

CiteScore 2018: 0.72

Source Normalized Impact per Paper (SNIP) 2018: 0.505

All Time Past Year Past 30 Days
Abstract Views 0 0 0
Full Text Views 188 173 11
PDF Downloads 147 138 3