Changes in Physical and Chemical Properties of Calcic Chernozem Affected by Robinia pseudoacacia and Quercus robur Plantings


Growth of forest plantations on soils causes changes in their properties. These changes, their behavior, and magnitude depend on the original soil characteristics and also on the effect of forest plantations being grown. In the steppe zone of Ukraine, Robinia pseudoacacia L. and Quercus robur L. are the woody species most widely used in planting of forest plantations on chernozem soil. Chernozem soil formed exclusively under zonal steppe vegetation and chernozem soil under Robinia pseudoacacia and Quercus robur plantations were studied in this work to analyze the changes in soil properties caused by growth of these tree species. Dry aggregate size distribution, density, particle density, total porosity, organic carbon content, cation exchange capacity, pH values, hydrolytic soil acidity and dry residue, and the available nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium content were analyzed. The studies found that Robinia pseudoacacia and Quercus robur plantations contribute to an increase in the share of aggregates 2–1 mm in size, as well as formation of aggregate fraction >10 mm, which are completely absent in the Calcic chernozem developed under the steppe vegetation. An increase in the density and particle density, as well as a decrease in the total porosity values were observed under the influence of forest stands studied. This is more common with chernozem under Q. robur plantation. It was found that the carbon percentage decreased in chernozem under the influence of Robinia pseudoacacia growth (on average, 0.4% by a meter-deep layer), but under Quercus robur planting it increased (on average 0.3% by meter-deep layer). Effect of Robinia pseudoacacia plantings on chernozem was also manifested by a decrease in cation exchange capacity (on average, 11 cmol/100 g by a meter-deep layer). The growth of R. pseudoacacia and Quercus robur plantations results in decrease of pH values (0.2 by a meter-deep layer) and increase of hydrolytic soil acidity and dry residue in chernozem water extract. Effect of Robinia pseudoacacia planting leads to a decrease in carbon, nitrogen, and phosphorus content in chernozem. The change in chernozem properties under the influence of Quercus robur plantation is reflected in accumulation of these nutrients. Growth of Robinia pseudoacacia and Quercus robur plantations leads to a decrease in potassium reserves in chernozem, which may indicate its active uptake by these woody species. In general, Q. robur planting is characterized by a large positive effect on the physical and chemical properties of chernozem than Robinia pseudoacacia planting. The findings obtained serve as a ground for making a recommendation for growing Quercus robur plantations under climate conditions of the steppe zone of Ukraine in order to improve the zonal chernozems’ state and fertility.

If the inline PDF is not rendering correctly, you can download the PDF file here.

  • Amundson, R., Berhe, A.A., Hopmans, J.W., Olson, C., Sztein, A.E. & Sparks D.L. (2015). Soil and human security in the 21st century. Science, 348(6235), 1261071. DOI: 10.1126/science.1261071.

  • An, S., Mentler, A., Mayer, H. & Blum W.E.H. (2010). Soil aggregation, aggregate stability, organic carbon and nitrogen in different soil aggregate fractions under forest and shrub vegetation on the Loess Plateau, China. Catena, 81(3), 226–233. DOI: 10.1016/j.catena.2010.04.002.

  • Baranovski, B., Roschina, N., Karmyzova, L. & Ivanko I. (2018). Comparison of commonly used ecological scales with the Belgard Plant Ecomorph System. Biosystems Diversity, 26(4), 286–291. DOI: 10.15421/011843.

  • Bárcena, T.G., Gundersen, P. & Vesterdal L. (2014). Afforestation effects on SOC in former cropland: Oak and spruce chronosequences resampled after 13 years. Global Change Biology, 20(9), 2938–2952. DOI: 10.1111/gcb.12608.

  • Bejarano, M.D., Villar, R., Murillo, A.M. & Quero J.L. (2010). Effects of soil compaction and light on growth of Quercus pyrenaica Willd. (Fagaceae) seedlings. Soil Tillage Res., 110(1), 108–114. DOI: 10.1016/j.still.2010.07.008.

  • Berthrong, S.T., Piñeiro, G., Jobbágy, E.G. & Jackson R.B. (2012). Soil C and N changes with afforestation of grasslands across gradients of precipitation and plantation age. Ecol. Appl., 22(1), 76–86. DOI: 10.1890/10-2210.1.

  • Bonfante, A., Terribile, F. & Bouma J. (2019). Refining physical aspects of soil quality and soil health when exploring the effects of soil degradation and climate change on biomass production: An Italian case study. Soil, 5(1), 1–14. DOI: 10.5194/soil-5-1-2019.

  • Boussougou, I.N.M., Brais, S., Tremblay, F. & Gaussiran S. (2010). Soil quality and tree growth in plantations of forest and agricultural origin. Soil Sci. Soc. Am. J., 74(3), 993–1000. DOI: 10.2136/sssaj2009.0264.

  • Brygadyrenko, V.V. (2014). Influence of soil moisture on litter invertebrate community structure of pine forests of the steppe zone of Ukraine. Folia Oecologica, 41(1), 8–16.

  • Brygadyrenko, V.V. (2015). Community structure of litter invertebrates of forest belt ecosystems in the Ukrainian steppe zone. International Journal of Environmental Research, 9(4), 1183–1192. DOI: 10.22059/IJER.2015.1008.

  • Brygadyrenko, V.V. (2016). Effect of canopy density on litter invertebrate community structure in pine forests. Ekológia (Bratislava), 35(1), 90–102. DOI: 10.1515/eko-2016-0007.

  • Cambi, M., Mariotti, B., Fabiano, F., Maltoni, A., Tani, A., Foderi, C., Laschi, A. & Marchi E. (2018). Early response of Quercus robur seedlings to soil compaction following germination. Land Degrad. Dev., 29(4), 916–925. DOI: 10.1002/ldr.2912.

  • Carter, M.R. & Gregorich E.G. (2008). Soil sampling and methods of analysis. Boca Raton: CRC Press.

  • Chaplot, V. & Cooper M. (2015). Soil aggregate stability to predict organic carbon outputs from soils. Geoderma, 243–244, 205–213. DOI: 10.1016/j.geoderma.2014.12.013.

  • Chappell, A., Webb, N.P., Leys, J.F., Waters, C.M., Orgill, S. & Eyres M.J. (2019). Minimising soil organic carbon erosion by wind is critical for land degradation neutrality. Environmental Science and Policy, 93, 43–52. DOI: 10.1016/j.envsci.2018.12.020.

  • Clark, J.D. & Johnson A.H. (2011). Carbon and nitrogen accumulation in post-agricultural forest soils of western New England. Soil Sci. Soc. Am. J., 75(4), 1530–1542. DOI: 10.2136/sssaj2010.0180.

  • Day, S.D., Wiseman, P.E., Dickinson, S.B. & Harris J.R. (2010). Tree root ecology in the urban environment and implications for a sustainable rhizosphere. Arboriculture and Urban Forestry, 36, 193–205.

  • De Carvalho Silva Neto, E., Pereira, M.G., Fernandes, J.C.F. & De Andrade Corrêa Neto T. (2016). Aggregate formation and soil organic matter under different vegetation types in Atlantic Forest from Southeastern Brazil. Semina: Ciencias Agrarias, 37(6), 3927–3940. DOI: 10.5433/1679-0359.2016v37n6p3927.

  • Edmondson, J.L., O’Sullivan, O.S., Inger, R., Potter, J., McHugh, N., Gaston, K.J. & Leake J.R. (2014). Urban tree effects on soil organic carbon. PLoS ONE, 9(7), e101872. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0101872.

  • Foote, R.L. & Grogan P. (2010). Soil carbon accumulation during temperate forest succession on abandoned low productivity agricultural lands. Ecosystems, 13(6), 795–812. DOI: 10.1007/s10021-010-9355-0.

  • Gu, C., Mu, X., Gao, P., Zhao, G., Sun, W., Tatarko, J. & Tan X. (2019). Influence of vegetation restoration on soil physical properties in the Loess Plateau, China. Journal of Soils and Sediments, 19(2), 716–728. DOI: 10.1007/s11368-018-2083-3.

  • Guidelines for soil description (2006). Rome: FAO.

  • Guo, L.B. & Gifford R.M. (2002). Soil carbon stocks and land use change: a metaanalysis. Global Change Biology, 8, 345–360. DOI: 10.1046/j.1354-1013.2002.00486.x.

  • Gurmesa, G.A., Schmidt, I.K., Gundersen, P. & Vesterdal L. (2013). Soil carbon accumulation and nitrogen retention traits of four tree species grown in common gardens. For. Ecol. Manag., 309, 47–57. DOI: 10.1016/j. foreco.2013.02.015.

  • IUSS Working Group WRB (2015). World Reference Base for Soil Resources 2014, update 2015 International soil classification system for naming soils and creating legends for soil maps.

  • Jiang, C., Liu, J., Zhang, H., Zhang, Z. & Wang D. (2019). China’s progress towards sustainable land degradation control: Insights from the northwest arid regions. Ecological Engineering, 127, 75–87. DOI: 10.1016/j.ecoleng.2018.11.014.

  • Jiang, R., Gunina, A., Qu, D., Kuzyakov, Y., Yu, Y., Hatano, R., Frimpong, K.A. & Li M. (2019). Afforestation of loess soils: Old and new organic carbon in aggregates and density fractions. Catena, 177, 49–56. DOI: 10.1016/j. catena.2019.02.002.

  • Jiao, F., Wen, Z.-M. & An S.-S. (2011). Changes in soil properties across a chronosequence of vegetation restoration on the Loess Plateau of China. Catena, 86(2), 110–116. DOI: 10.1016/j.catena.2011.03.001.

  • Jobbagy, E.G. & Jackson R.B. (2000). The vertical distribution of soil organic carbon and its relation to climate and vegetation. Ecol. Appl., 10, 423–436. DOI: 10.1890/1051-0761(2000)010[0423:TVDOSO]2.0.CO;2.

  • Kormanek, M., Głąb, T., Banach, J. & Szewczyk G. (2015). Effects of soil bulk density on sessile oak Quercus petraea Liebl. seedlings. European Journal of Forest Research, 134(6), 969–979. DOI: 10.1007/s10342-015-0902-2.

  • Lal, R. (2004). Soil carbon sequestration impacts on global climate change and food security. Science, 304(5677), 1623–1627. DOI: 10.1126/science.1097396.

  • Lal, R. (2005). Forest soils and carbon sequestration. For. Ecol. Manag., 220(1−3), 242–258. DOI: 10.1016/j. foreco.2005.08.015.

  • Li, W., Yan, M., Qingfeng, Z. & Zhikaun J. (2012). Effects of vegetation restoration on soil physical properties in the wind-water erosion region of the Northern Loess Plateau of China. Clean – Soil, Air, Water, 40(1), 7–15. DOI: 10.1002/clen.201100367.

  • Li, Y.Y. & Shao M.A. (2006). Change of soil physical properties under long-term natural vegetation restoration in the Loess Plateau of China. J. Arid Environ., 64(1), 77–96. DOI: 10.1016/j.jaridenv.2005.04.005.

  • Medvedev, V.V., Plisko, I.V. & Bigun O.N. (2014). Comparative characterization of the optimum and actual parameters of Ukrainian chernozems. Eurasian Soil Science, 47(10), 1044–1057. DOI: 10.1134/S106422931410007X.

  • Netsvetov, M., Prokopuk, Y., Didukh, Y. & Romenskyy M. (2018). Climatic sensitivity of Quercus robur L. in flood-plain near Kyiv under river regulation. Dendrobiology, 79, 20–33. DOI: 10.12657/denbio.079.003.

  • Paul, K.I., Polglase, P.J., Nyakuengama, J.G. & Khanna P.K. (2002). Change in soil carbon following afforestation. For. Ecol. Manag., 168(1–3), 241–257. DOI: 10.1016/S0378-1127(01)00740-X.

  • Polláková, N., Šimanský, V. & Kravka M.J. (2018). The influence of soil organic matter fractions on aggregates stabilization in agricultural and forest soils of selected Slovak and Czech hilly lands. Soils Sediments, 18, 2790. DOI: 10.1007/s11368-017-1842-x.

  • Ritter, E., Vesterdal, L. & Gundersen P. (2003). Changes in soil properties after afforestation of former intensively managed soils with oak and Norway spruce. Plant Soil, 249(2), 319–330. DOI: 10.1023/A:1022808410732.

  • Sauer, T.J., James, D.E., Cambardella, C.A. & Hernandez-Ramirez G. (2012). Soil properties following reforestation or afforestation of marginal cropland. Plant Soil, 360(1-2), 375–390. DOI: 10.1007/s11104-012-1258-8.

  • Six, J., Bossuyt, H., Degryze, S. & Denef K. (2004). A history of research on the link between (micro)aggregates, soil biota, and soil organic matter dynamics. Soil Tillage Res., 79(1), 7–31. DOI: 10.1016/j.still.2004.03.008.

  • Sun, D., Zhang, W., Lin, Y., Liu, Z., Shen, W., Zhou, L., Rao, X., Liu, S., Cai, X.-A., He, D. & Fu S. (2018). Soil erosion and water retention varies with plantation type and age. For. Ecol. Manag., 422, 1–10. DOI: 10.1016/j. foreco.2018.03.048.

  • Ussiri, D.A.N., Lal, R. & Jacinthe P.A. (2006). Soil properties and carbon sequestration of afforested pastures in reclaimed minesoils of Ohio. Soil Sci. Soc. Am. J., 70(5), 1797–1806. DOI: 10.2136/sssaj2005.0352.

  • Webb, N.P., Marshall, N.A., Stringer, L.C., Reed, M.S., Chappell, A. & Herrick J.E. (2017). Land degradation and climate change: building climate resilience in agriculture. Frontiers in Ecology and the Environment, 15(8), 450–459. DOI: 10.1002/fee.1530.

  • Wiśniewski, P. & Märker M. (2019). The role of soil-protecting forests in reducing soil erosion in young glacial landscapes of Northern-Central Poland. Geoderma, 337, 1227–1235. DOI: 10.1016/j.geoderma.2018.11.035.

  • Wunder, S. & Bodle R. (2019). Achieving land degradation neutrality in Germany: Implementation process and design of a land use change based indicator. Environmental Science and Policy, 92, 46–55. DOI: 10.1016/j.envsci.2018.09.022.

  • Zhang, Q., Shao, M., Jia, X. & Zhang C. (2018). Understory vegetation and drought effects on soil aggregate stability and aggregate-associated carbon on the load plateau in China. Soil Sci. Soc. Am. J., 82(1), 106–114. DOI: 10.2136/sssaj2017.05.0145.

  • Zhang, X., Yang, Z., Zha, T., Zhang, Z., Wang, G., Zhu, Y. & Lü Z. (2017). Changes in the physical properties of soil in forestlands after 22 years under the influence of the conversion of cropland into farmland project in Loess region, Western Shanxi Province. Shengtai Xuebao/Acta Ecologica Sinica, 37(2), 416–424. DOI: 10.5846/stxb201507291596.

  • Zhang, X., Adamowski, J.F., Deo, R.C., Xu, X., Zhu, G. & Cao J. (2018). Effects of afforestation on soil bulk density and pH in the Loess Plateau, China. Water (Switzerland), 10(12), 1710. DOI: 10.3390/w10121710.

  • Zhou, Y., Hartemink, A. E., Shi, Z., Liang, Z. & Lu Y. (2019). Land use and climate change effects on soil organic carbon in North and Northeast China. Sci. Total Environ., 647, 1230–1238. DOI: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2018.08.016.

Journal + Issues