Action Research in Landscape Ecology (Šumava Biosphere Reserve, Czech Republic Case Study )

Open access


Current landscape ecological research applies trans-disciplinarity as a principle when considering the study of landscape as a multifunctional entity. The principle can be practically applied by use of participatory action research. The paper reports on the use of participatory action research in the process of step-by-step institutionalization of the Šumava Biosphere Reserve, as a complement to the state-conducted nature conservation, which took place in the period 1991−2016. To briefly summarize the main findings, we can suggest that the present institutional model of the Šumava Biosphere Reserve emerged primarily thanks to the ‘permanent jointly conducted experiment’ that followed the spiral scheme of action research, in which outputs of one implementation project served as a starting point to formulate, and subsequently realize the follow-up projects(s). The local community was engaged in the whole process, hence lessons learned became a part of local social and cultural capital, which since can be considered important endogenous developmental potential of the region.

Antrop, M. (2006). Sustainable landscapes: contradiction, fiction or utopia. Landsc. Urban Plann., 75(3-4), 187-197. DOI: 10.1016/j.landurbplan.2005.02.014.

Bartoš, M., Kušova, D. & Těšitel J. (1998). Integrated endogenous regional development concept and the role of Šumava National Park administration. Silva Gabreta, 2, 385-394.

Bauman, Z. (2002). Tekuta modernita. Praha: Mlada fronta.

Becker, C. & George B.P. (2011). Rapid trail transit and tourism development in the United States. Tourism Geographies, 13(3), 381-397. DOI: 10.1080/14616688.2011.570779.

Berg, B.L. (2004). Qualitative research methods for the social sciences. Boston: Pearson Education.

Bousset, J.P., Skuras, D., Těšitel, J., Marsat, J.P., Petrou, A., Pantziou, E.F., Kušova, D. & Bartoš M. (2007). A decision support system for integrated tourism development: Rethinking tourism policies and management strategies in the Czech Republic, France and Greece. Tourism Geographies, 9(4), 387-404. DOI: 10.1080/14616680701647576.

Council of Europe (2000). European Landscape Convention. Florence: Council of Europe. On-line available on$FILE/OZV_anglicky_text_EoUK_20120125.pdf . Downloaded 02. 06. 2017

Elbakidze, M., Angelstam, P., Sandstrom, C., Stryamets, N., Crow, S., Axelsson, R., Stryamets, G. & Yamelynets T. (2013). Biosphere Reserves for conservation and development in Ukraine? Legal recognition and establishment of the Roztochya initiative. Environ. Conserv., 40(2), 157-166. DOI: 10.1017/S0376892912000434.

Elden, M. & Chisholm R.F. (1993). Emerging varieties of action research: Introduction to the special issue. Human Relations, 46(2), 121-142. DOI: 10.1177/001872679304600201.

Garfoli, G. (1992). Endogenous development and Southern Europe: and introduction. In G. Garfoli (Ed.), Endogenous development and Southern Europe. Averbury: Aldershot.

Ghimire, K. & Pimbert M. (1997). Social change and conservation: an overview of issues and concepts. In K. Ghimire & M. Pimbert (Eds.), Social change and conservation: Environmental politics and impacts of national parks and protected areas. London: Earthscan Publications.

Gorner, T., Najmanova, K. & Cihar M. (2012). Changes in local people’s perceptions of the Šumava National Park in the Czech Republic over a ten year period (1998−2008). Sustainability, 4(6), 1354-1370. DOI: 10.3390/su4061354.

Habibah, A., Mushrifah, I., Hamzah, J. E.A.C., Buang, A., Toriman, M.E., Selvadurai, S. & Zaimah R. (2013). Placemaking of ecotourism in Tasik Chini: From exploratory to the contemporary biosphere reserve. Asian Social Science, 9(6), 84-95. DOI: 10.5539/ass.v9n6p84.

Hadwen, W.L., Boon, P.I. & Arthington A.H. (2012). Aquatic ecosystems in inland Australia: tourism and recreational significance, ecological impacts and imperatives for management. Mar. Freshw. Res., 63(4), 325-340. DOI: 10.1071/MF11198.

Hall, D. (2000). Identity, community and sustainability: Prospects for rural tourism in Albania. In D. Richards & D. Hall (Eds.), Tourism and sustainable community development. London: Routledge.

Hayes, T. (2006). Parks, people and forest conservation: An institutional assessment of the effectiveness of protected areas. World Development, 34(12), 2064-2075. DOI: 10.1016/j.worlddev.2006.03.002

Hendl, J. (2008). Kvalitativni vyzkum: zakladni teorie, metody a aplikace. Praha: Portal.

Hirschnitz-Garbers, M. & Stoll-Kleemann S. (2011). Opportunities and barriers in the implementation of protected area management: A qualitative meta-analysis of case studies from European protected areas. Geographical Journal, 177(4), 321-334. DOI: 10.1111/j.1475-4959.2010.00391.x.

Holling, C.S., Carpenter, S.R., Broclt, W.A. & Gunderson L.H. (2002). Discoveries for sustainable futures. In L.H. Gunderson & C.S. Holling (Eds.), Panarchy: understanding transformations in systems of humans and nature. Washington DC: Island Press.

Jenίk, J. & Price M.F. (1994). Biosphere Reserves on the Crossroads of Central Europe. Praha: Empora.

Jenίk, J. (1996). Biosfericke rezervace Česke republiky: přiroda a lide pod zaštitou UNESCO. Praha: Empora.

Keller, J. (2007). Sociologie organizace a byrokracie; druhe vydani. Praha: SLON.

Kemmis, S. (1988): The action research reader. Victoria, Australia: Deakin University.

Kluvankova-Oravska, T. & Chobotova V. (2010). Inštitucie a ekosystemove služby v demokratickej a trhovej spoločnosti. Životne Prostredie, 44(2), 84-87.

Kopp, J. (2014). Strategicke planovani udržitelneho rozvoje velkoplošnych chraněnych uzemi. Trendy v Podnikani, 4(4), 58-66.

Křenová, Z. & Vrba J. (2014). Just how many obstacles are there to creating a national park? A case study from the Šumava National Park. European Journal of Environmental Sciences, 4(1), 30-36. DOI: 10.14712/23361964.2015.2.

Kušová, D., Těšitel, J., Matějka, K. & Bartoš M. (2005a). Nature conservation and socio-economic development in selected protected areas. Ekologia (Bratislava), 24(Suppl. 1), 109-124.

Kušová, D., Těšitel, J. & Bartoš M. (2005b). Medial image of the relation between nature conservation and socioeconomic development in selected protected areas. Silva Gabreta, 11(2), 123-133.

Kušová, D., Těšitel, J., Matějka, K. & Bartoš M. (2006). Socio-economic conditions in selected biosphere reserves. Silva Gabreta, 12(3), 157-169.

Kušová, D., Těšitel, J., Matějka, K. & Bartoš M. (2008a). Biosphere reserves - an attempt to form sustainable landscapes (A case study of three biosphere reserves in the Czech Republic). Landsc. Urban Plann., 84(1), 38-51. DOI: 10.1016/j.landurbplan.2007.06.006

Kušová, D., Těšitel, J. & Bartoš M. (2008b). Biosphere reserves - learning sites of sustainable development? Silva Gabreta, 14(3), 221-234.

Kušová, D., Těšitel, J. & Bartoš M. (2009). Biosphere reserves as learning sites for sustainable development (a case study of the Czech Republic). In L.R. Elling (Ed.), Social development. New York: Nova Publishing.

Kušová, D. & Těšitel J. (2014). Social perception of nature conservation in protected areas (Czech Republic case). Silva Gabreta, 20(1), 41-54.

Kušová, D. & Těšitel J. (2016a): The Šumava Biosphere Reserve - historical reflection on institutional arrangements. Silva Gabreta, 22(1), 99-109.

Kušová, D. & Těšitel J. (2016b): Biosfericka rezervace Šumava - inovativni nastroj integrovane ochrany přirody. Regionalni rozvoj mezi teorii a praxi, 2, 88-103.

Lagendijk, A. & Cornford J. (2000). Regional institutions and knowledge - tracking new forms of regional development policy. Geoforum, 31, 209-218. DOI: 10.1016/S0016- 7185(99)00031-7.

Law, R., Leung, R. & Buhalis D. (2009). Information technology applications in hospitality and tourism: A reviews of publications from 2005 to 2007. Journal of Travel and Tourism Marketing, 26(5−6), 599-623. DOI: 10.1080/10548400903163160.

Lisi, F.A. & Esposito F. (2014). Semantic web services for integrated tourism in the Apulia region. CEUR Workshop Proceedings, 1195, 178-193.

Ludwig, M., Gruninger, F., Rothfuss, E. & Heurich M. (2012). Discourse analysis as an instrument to reveal the pivotal role of the media in local acceptance or rejection of a wildlife management project. A case study from the Bavarian Forest National Park. Erdkunde, 66(2), 143-156. DOI: 10.3112/erdkunde.2012.02.04.

Lundvall, B.A. (1997). Information technology in the learning economy. Communications and Strategies, 28, 117-192.

McTaggert, R. (1991): Principles for participatory action research. Adult Education Quarterly, 41(3), 168-187. DOI: 10.1177/0001848191041003003.

Odell, J.S. (2004). Case study methods in international political economy. In D.F. Sprinz & Y. Wolinski-Nahmias (Eds.), Models, numbers and cases: Methods for studying international relations. Michigan: University of Michigan Press.

Onaindia, M., Ballesteros, F., Alonso, G., Monge-Ganuzas, M. & Peňa L. (2013). Participatory process to prioritize actions for a sustainable management in a biosphere reserve. Environmental Science and Policy, 33, 283-294. DOI: 10.1016/j.envsci.2013.05.012.

Özyavuz, M. & Yazgan M.E. (2010). Planning of İĝneada longos (flooded) forests as a biosphere reserve. J. Coast. Res., 26(6), 1104-1111. DOI: 10.2112/JCOASTRES-D-09-00065.1.

Paavola, J. & Adger N.W. (2005). Institutional ecological economics. Ecological Economics, 53, 353-368. DOI: 10.1016/j.ecolecon.2004.09.017.

Petrova, S. (2014). Communities in transition: Protected nature and local people in Eastern and Cental Europe. Manchester: University of Manchester.

Prchalová, J. (2010). Zakon o ochraně přirody a krajiny a NATURA 2000. Uplne zněni zakona s komentařem, judikaturou a provaděcimi předpisy. Praha: LINDE.

Price, M.F. (1996). UNESCO’S Man and the Biosphere (MAB) programme in the mountains of Central and Eastern Europe: past experiences and future possibilities. Silva Gabreta, 1, 289-298.

Selcuk Can, A., Alaeddinoglu, F. & Turker N. (2014). Local authorities participation in the tourism planning process. Transylvanian Review of Administrative Sciences, 41, 190-212.

Solár, J., Janiga, M. & Markuljakova K. (2016). The socioeconomic and environmental effects of sustainable development in the Eastern Carpathians, and protecting its environment. Pol. J. Environ. Stud., 25(1), 291−300. DOI: 10.15244/pjoes/60177.

Stoll-Kleeman, S. & O’Riordan T. (2002). From participation to partnership in biodiversity conservation: experience from Germany and South Africa. Society and Natural Resources, 15, 161-177. DOI: 10.1080/089419202753403337.

Stoll-Kleeman, S. & O’Riordan T. (2017). The challenges of the anthropocene for Biosphere Reserve. Parks, 23(1), 89-100. DOI:10.2305/IUCN.CH.2017.PARKS-23-1SS-K.en.

Susman, G.I. & Evered R.D. (1978). An assessment of the scientific merits of action research. Administrative Science Quarterly, 23(4), 582−603.

Švajda, J. (2008). Participatory conservation in a post-communist context: The Tatra national park and biosphere reserve, Slovakia. International Journal of Biodiversity Science and Management, 4(4), 200-208. DOI: 10.3843/ Biodiv.4.4:3.

Těšitel, J., Bartoš, M., Cudlinova, E., Heřman, M., Kušova, D. & Zemek F. (1997). Sustainable development strategy for the Šumava Biosphere Reserve. Final report. Česke Budějovice: Institute of Landscape Ecology AS CR.

Těšitel, J., Kušova, D. & Bartoš M. (1999). Non marginal parameters of marginal areas. Ekologia (Bratislava), 18(2), 39-46.

Těšitel, J., Kušova, D. & Bartoš M. (2003). Role of tourism in development of rural marginal areas (region Šumava Mts., Czech Republic). In J. Banski & J. Owsinski (Eds.), Alternatives for European Rural Areas. Warsaw: European Rural Development Network, Institute of Agricultural and Food Economics, Institute of Geography and Spatial Organization, Polish Academy of Science.

Těšitel, J., Kušova, D., Matějka, K. & Bartoš M. (2005a). Protected landscape areas and regional development (the case of the Czech Republic). In Z. Florianczyk & K. Czapiewski (Eds.), Rural development capacity in Carpathian Europe. Warsaw: European Rural Development Network, Institute of Agricultural and Food Economics, Institute of Geography and Spatial Organization, Polish Academy of Science.

Těšitel, J., Kušova, D., Matějka, K. & Bartoš M. (2005b). Lide v biosferickych rezervacich. Česke Budějovice: Institute of system biology and ecology AS CR.

Těšitel, J., Kušova, D. & Bartoš M. (2007). Šetrny turismus v biosferickych rezervacich - nastroj formovani siti spoluprace (připadova studie Biosfericke rezervace Šumava). Klagenfurt: Government of Carinthia.

Těšitel, J. & Kušova D. (2010). Biosphere reserves - suggested model of the institution of commons (Case study of the Šumava Biosphere Reserve). Journal of Landscape Ecology, 3(2), 73-89.

Těšitel, J., Kušova, D., Silovsky, V. & Matějka K. (2014). Biosphere reserve - platform to communicate nature conservation with local development (Šumava Mts., Czech Republic case). In J. Těšitel, B. Kolbmuller & G. Stoglehner (Eds.), Vital landscapes. Česke Budějovice: NEBE.

Tress, B., Tress, G. & Valk V.D. (2003). Interdisciplinary and transdisciplinary landscape studies - the Wageningen DELTA approach. In B. Tress, G. Tress, A. Valk & G. Fry (Eds.), Interdisciplinarity and transdisciplinarity in landscape studies: Potential and limitations.Wageningen: DELTA series 2.

Troll, C. (1939). Luftbildplan und okologische Bodenforschung. Zeitschrift der Gesellschaft fur Erdkunde, Berlin.

United Nations (2015a). Transforming our World: The 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development. On-line available on . Downloaded 02. 06. 2017.

United Nations (2015b). Sustainable Development Goals. On-line available on Downloaded 02. 06. 2017.

UNESCO (1996): Biosphere Reserves: The Seville Strategy and the Statutory Framework of the World Network. Paris: UNESCO.

UNESCO (2008). The Madrid declaration. Paris: UNESCO.

Urban, F. (2006). Institutional and management frameworks in the Biosphere Reserve Šumava. Manuscript, study on behalf of ETE (Ecological Tourism in Europe). Bonn: ETE

World Bank (1994): Czech Republic Biodiversity Project. Global Environmental Facility, Report No. 11739-CZ.

Zelenka, J., Těšitel, J., Paskova, M. & Kušova D. (2013). Udržitelny cestovni ruch - management cestovniho ruchu v chraněnych uzemich. Hradec Kralove: Gaudeamus.

Ekológia (Bratislava)

The Journal of Institute of Landscape Ecology of Slovak Academy of Sciences

Journal Information

CiteScore 2017: 0.52

SCImago Journal Rank (SJR) 2017: 0.211
Source Normalized Impact per Paper (SNIP) 2017: 0.324


All Time Past Year Past 30 Days
Abstract Views 0 0 0
Full Text Views 215 207 18
PDF Downloads 116 113 14