Impact of secondary landscape structure on the presence of non-native plant species in the cadastral area of the Topoľčany town

Open access


This study characterises an impact of secondary landscape structure on the introduction of non-native plant species during the years 2008 and 2010−2012. The field mapping was realised in the cadastral area of the Topoľčany town. The area of study consists of built-up area with surrounding agricultural land. During the period of our research, we identified the presence of total 55 non-native plant species, including 21 invasive, 11 casual and 23 naturalised. The highest dominance occurred in elements of ruderal vegetation without trees (22) and in the vegetation protection of aquatic dams (15). Several species were observed in a wide range of landscape elements. The occurrence in many structurally different types of habitats confirmed the ability of non-native species to tolerate a wide range of biotic and abiotic conditions.

If the inline PDF is not rendering correctly, you can download the PDF file here.

  • Anderson D.P. Turner M.G. Pearson S.M. Albright T.P. Peet R.K. & Wieben A. (2013). Predicting Microstegium vimineum invasion in intact forests of the southern Blue Ridge Mountains U.S.A. Biol. Invasions 15 1217−1230. DOI: 10.1007/s10530-012-0361-3.

  • Baudry J. & Tatoni T. (1993). Changes in landscape patterns and vegetation dynamics in Provence France. Landsc. Urban Plann. 24 153–159. DOI: 10.1016/0169-2046(93)90093-S.

  • Callaway R.M. & Aschehoug E.T. (2000). Invasive plants versus their new and old neighbors: A mechanism for exotic invasion. Science 290 521–523. DOI: 10.1126/science.290.5491.521.

  • Davis M.A. Grime J.P. & Thompson K. (2000). Fluctuating resources in plantcommunities: a general theory of invasibility. J. Ecol. 88(3) 528–534. DOI: 10.1046/j.1365-2745.2000.00473.x.

  • Eliáš P. (1992). The flora of the protected area Ponitrie (mountains Tríbeč a Vtáčnik) (in Slovak). Rosalia 8 37–56.

  • Eliáš P. (2001). Biotic invasion and invading organisms (in Slovak). Životné Prostredie 35(2) 61–66.

  • Feráková V. Hodálová I. Kučera P. Solenská M. & Sucháňová J. (2002). Contribution to the inventories of vascular plants in protected area Ponitrie (in Slovak). Rosalia 16 49–57.

  • Goudie A. (2005). The human impact on the natural environment: past present and future. Oxford: Blackwell Publishing.

  • Huxel G.R. (1999). Rapid displacement of native species by invasive species: effects of hybridization. Biol. Conserv. 89 143–152. DOI: 10.1016/S0006-3207(98)00153-0.

  • Kowarik I. (2008). On the role of alien species in urban flora and vegetation. In J. Marzluff et al. (Eds.) Urban ecology (pp. 321–338). New York: Springer. DOI: 10.1007/978-0-387-73412-5.

  • Mahy G. Vanhecke L. Meerts P. & Nijs I. (2006). Invasive plants in Belgium: Patterns processes and monitoring (Inplanbel). Brussels: Belgian Science Policy.

  • Marinelli J. (2004). Plant (in Slovak). Bratislava: Ikar.

  • Medvecká J. Kliment J. Májeková J. Halada Ľ. Zaliberová M. Gojdičová E. Feráková V. & Jarolímek I. (2012). Inventory of the alien flora of Slovakia. Preslia 84 257–309.

  • Meiners J.S. & Cadenasso L.M. (2005). The relationship between community diversity and exotic plants: cause or consequence of invasion? In Professor Inderjit (Ed.) Invasive plants: Ecological and agricultural aspects (pp. 97–114). Birkhauser: Springer. DOI: 10.1007/3-7643-7380-6_6.

  • Mlíkovský J. & Stýblo P. (Eds.) (2006). Non-native species of fauna and flora of the Czech Republic (in Czech). Praha: Český svaz ochránců přírody.

  • Nentwig W. (Ed.) (2007). Biological invasions. Ecological Studies 193. Berlin Heidelberg: Springer. DOI:10.1007/978-3-540-36920-2

  • Oláhová J. Vojtek M. & Boltižiar M. (2012). Use of selected GIS extensions for the analysis of secondary landscape structure of the Handlová town. In H. Svobodová (Ed.) Geography and geoinformatics: Challenge for practise and education. Proceedings of 19th International Conference (pp. 132–140). Brno: Masarykova univerzita.

  • Oláhová J. Vojtek M. & Boltižiar M. (2013). Application of geoinformation technologies for the assessment of landscape structure using landscape-ecological indexes (case study of the Handlová landslide). Tájökológiai Lapok 11(2) 351−366.

  • Pauková Ž. & Eliáš P. (2010). Alien invasive quarantine and problematic plant species in SW Slovakia (in Slovak). In M. Eliášová (Ed.) Starostlivosť o biodiverzitu vo vidieckej krajine (pp. 136–144). Zborník vedeckých prác. Nitra: SPU.

  • Petrovič F. Bugár G. & Hreško J. (2009). List of mappable landscape elements in Slovakia (in Slovak). Geo Information 5 112–124.

  • Pimm S.L. Russell G.J. Gittleman J.L. & Brooks T.M. (1995). The future of biodiversity. Science 269 347–350. DOI: 10.1126/science.269.5222.347.

  • Pyšek P. Sádlo J. & Mandák B. (2002). Catalogue of alien plants of the Czech Republic. Preslia 74 97–186.

  • Řehořek V. & Svobodová Z. (1985). Floristické pomery Nitrianskeho okresu. Rosalia 2 91–112.

  • Rejmánek M. Richardson D.M. Higgins S.I. Pitcairn M.J. & Grotkopp E. (2005). Ecology of invasive plants: state of the art. In H.A. Mooney R.N. Mack J.A. McNeely et al. (Eds.) Invasive alien species: searching for solutions (pp. 104−161). Washington: Island Press.

  • Rosenberg D.K. Noon B.R. & Meslow Ch.E. (1997). Biological corridors: form function and efficacy. BioScience 47(10) 677–687. DOI:10.2307/1313208.

  • Ter Braak C.J. F. & Šmilauer P. (2002). CANOCO Reference Manual and CanoDraw for Windows User’s Guide: Software for Canonical Community Ordination (version 4.5). USA : Ithaca NY. ( Microcomputer Power.

  • Thiele J. Schuckert U. & Otte A. (2008). Cultural landscapes of Germany are patch-corridor matrix mosaics for an invasive megaforb. Landsc. Ecol. 23(4) 453–465. DOI: 10.1007/s10980-008-9202-2.

  • Vilá M. & Pujadas J. (2001). Land-use and socio-economic correlates of plant invasions in European and North African countries. Biol. Conserv. 100 397–401. DOI: 10.1016/S0006-3207(01)00047-7.

  • Wittenberg R. & Cock M.J.W. (Eds.) (2001). Invasive alien species A toolkit of best prevention and management practices. Wallingford: CAB International.

Journal information
Impact Factor

CiteScore 2018: 0.77

SCImago Journal Rank (SJR) 2018: 0.283
Source Normalized Impact per Paper (SNIP) 2018: 0.534

All Time Past Year Past 30 Days
Abstract Views 0 0 0
Full Text Views 280 90 8
PDF Downloads 134 61 1