Assessment of Representative Landscape Types of Skalica District

Open access

Abstract

Assessment of landscape quality is not possible without a good local landscape-ecological, social, economic and also political knowledge. When similar scientific researches and proposals for strategic development documents for municipalities and regions are needed, they have to come out mainly from scientific knowledge about unique and rare representative types of landscape. Implementation of a research module of the presented study entitled ‘Assessment of representative landscapes of Skalica district’ represents a complex example of a proposal on the methodical procedure of landscape-ecological analysis of Skalica district. Therefore, the core of this work lies in the detailed determination of the environmental quality of landscapes in Skalica district, which allowed us to evaluate the degree of environmental load and protection of each selected representative landscape type in the model area. This scientific knowledge is in continuation of the project complemented with opinions and attitudes of residents and key stakeholders about environmental, economic, cultural and social problems. The obtained knowledge can help towards optimal use of resources and potentials in the area and thus contribute to improving the overall quality of life in the monitored area.

References

  • Antrop, M., Van Eetvelde, V., Janssens, J., Martens, I. & Van Damme S. (2002). Traditionele Landschappen van Vlaanderen. Ghent: Ghent University, Geography Department. http://www.geoweb.ugent.be/services/docs/tradla.pdf>

  • Bezak, P., Izakovičova, Z., Miklos, L. et al. (2010). Reprezentatívne typy krajiny Slovenska.Bratislava: UKE SAV.

  • Bunce, R.G.H., Barr, C.J., Clarke, R.T., Howard, D.C. & Lane A.M.J. (1996). Land classification forstrategic ecological survey. J. Environ. Manag., 47, 37-60. DOI: 10.1006/jema.1996.0034.

  • Council of Europe (2000). Europe landscape convention [online]. [cit. 24.11.2014].http://www.coe.int/t/dg4/cultureheritage/heritage/landscape/default_EN.asp

  • Izakovičova, Z. (2003). Environmentalne limity regionalneho rozvoja. In M. Kozova & Z. Bedrna (Eds.), Krajinnoekologické metódy v regionálnom environmentálnom hodnotení (pp. 95−103).Bratislava: Univerzita Komenskeho.

  • Lipsky, Z. & Romportl D. (2009). Typologie krajiny v České republice a zahraniči - stavproblematiky, metody a teoreticka vychodiska. Geografie - Sborník ČGS, 112, 61−83.

  • Meeus, J.H.A. (1995). Pan-European landscapes. Landsc. Urban Plann., 31, 57-79. doi : 10.1016/0169-2046(94)01036-8.

  • Miklos, L., Izakovičova, Z. et al. (2006). Atlas reprezentatívnych geosystémov Slovenska. Bratislava:UKE SAV.

  • Mücher, C.A., Garcia-Feced, C., Perez-Soba, M. & Wascher D.M. (2005). Landscapes of Europe. In M. Perez-Soba & D.M. Wascher (Eds.), Landscape character areas - places for buildingsustainable Europe (pp. vi+26). Oxford: Information Press.

  • Peterseil, J., Wrbka, T., Plutzar, C., Schmitzberger, I., Kiss, A., Szerencsits, E., Reiter, K., Schneider,W., Suppan, F. & Beissmann H. (2004). Evaluating the ecological sustainability of Austrianagricultural landcapes - The SINUS approach. Land Use Policy, 21, 307−320. doi : 10.1016/j.landusepol.2003.10.011.

  • Puschmann, O. (1998). The Norwegian landscape reference system. Use different sources to describe landscape regions. As (Norway): NIJOS.

  • Romportl, D. (2009). Typologie krajiny České republiky. Dizertačna praca, UK Praha.

  • Swanwick, C. (2002). Landscape character assessment. Guaidance for Englad and Scotland. The countrysides Agency, Scottish Naturale Heritage.

  • Wascher, D.M. (2005). European landscape character areas. Typologies, cartography and indicators for the assessment of sustainable landscapes. Wageningen: ELCAI, Landscape Europe, Alterra.

Ekológia (Bratislava)

The Journal of Institute of Landscape Ecology of Slovak Academy of Sciences

Journal Information


CiteScore 2016: 0.42

SCImago Journal Rank (SJR) 2016: 0.137
Source Normalized Impact per Paper (SNIP) 2016: 0.148

Metrics

All Time Past Year Past 30 Days
Abstract Views 0 0 0
Full Text Views 27 27 25
PDF Downloads 4 4 4