Personality Dimensions and Importance of the Social Role of the University Student in Explaining Student Involvement in Student Organization

Open access


In order to explore the student involvement in the student organization, field research was conducted amongst 669 students. The research instrument contained a questionnaire on students’ perception and satisfaction of the student organization; two scales of IPIP NEO (short form): Agreeableness (A) and Conscientiousness (C), and one dimension of the Laponce’s questionnaire: the importance of the social role of the university student. The analysis of the overall obtained data showed a very low level of involvement in student organization and a weak expression of the importance of the social role of the university student. A relatively weak connection between two personality dimensions and the involvement of students in the student organization has been found. A student’s involvement is determined more by the importance of the role, than by personality dimensions.

[1] Ackermann, K. (2016). Individual differences and Political Contexts - The role of personality traits and direct democracy in explaining political protest Swiss Political Science Review, 23 (1), 21-49.

[2] Administering IPIP Measures, with a 50-item Sample Questionnaire n.d. Retrieved from (n.d.).

[3] Brandstätter, H. & Opp, K. (2014). Personality Traits (‘Big Five’) and the Propensity to Political Protest: Alternative Models. Political Psychology, 35 (4), 515-537.

[4] Bracken, W. and Ludvik. (2014). Interaction between Engagement and the Big-Five Personality Characteristics on Academic Success of College Students.

[5] Journal of Progressive Policy & Practice, 2 (1), 65-78. Retrieved from

[6] Constitution of the Republic of Macedonia n.d. Retrieved from

[7] Dusso, A. (2016). An Enlightened Citizenry: The Personality of Civic Aptitude’ Bloomington: Indiana University. Center For Civic Literacy. Retrieved from

[8] Donnellan, B. et al. (2006). The Mini-IPIP Scales: Tiny-yet-effective measures of the Big Five Factors of Personality. Psychological Assessment,18 (2),192-203.

[9] Dinesen, P, Nørgaard, S. A. & Klemmensen, R. (2013). The Civic Personality: Personality and Democratic Citizenship. Political Studies, 62 (1),134-152.

[10] Eurostat n.d. Retrieved from

[11] Gallego, A. and Oberski, D. (2011). Personality and Political Participation: The Mediation Hypothesis. Political Behavior, 34 (3), 425-451. Retrieved from

[12] Gow, J. A. et al. (2005). Goldberg’s _IPIP_ Big-Five factor markers: Internal

[13] Consistency ad concurrent validation in Scotland. Personality and Individual Differences,39, 317-329. Retrieved from

[14] Gormly, V. A. and Brodzinski, M. D. (1990). Lifespan Human Development. San Diego: Harcourt Brace College Publishers.

[15] Gerber, S. A. et al. (2010). Personality and Political Behavior. American Political Science Review, 104 (1), 111-133. Retrieved from


[17] Goldberg, R. L. (1992). The development of markers for the Big-Five factor structure. Psychological Assessment 4 (1), 26-42.

[18] Hatemi, K. P. & Verhulst, B. (2015). Political Attitudes Develop Independently of Personality Traits. PLoS ONE (Public library of Science), 10 (3), 1-29. Retrieved from

[19] Ha, E. Shang et al. (2013). Personality Traits and Political Participation: Evidence from South Korea. Political Psychology, 34 (4),511-532

[20] Howe, C. E. & Fosnacht, K. (2017). Promoting Democratic Engagement During College: Looking Beyond Service-Learning. Journal of College and Character, 18 (3), 155-170. Retrieved from

[21] Kovačić, M. (2014). Studenti kao društveni i politički subject. Političke perspective, 4 (2), 43-60. Retrieved from

[22] Laponce, J. (2004). Using a role by role interview to measure the minority effect: a note on ongoing research. Social Science Information, 43 (3), 477-492.

[23] McCannon, M. & Bennett, P. (1996). Choosing to participate or not: A study of college students' involvement in student organizations. College Student Journal, 30 (3).

[24] Markovikj, M. & Serafimovska, E. (2014). Five Factorial Psychological Tests of Personality - NEP PI-3. Cultural adaptation - Macedonian case. Saarbrucken: Lambert Academic Publishing.

[25] Markovikj, M. (2010). Political Attitude and Personality in a Democratic Society. The Western Balkans Policy Review 1 (1), 168-184.

[26] McCrae, R. R. and Costa, T. P. (1992). NEO PI-R professional manual. Odessa, FL: Psychological Assessment Resources, Inc.

[27] Mondak, J, J. & Halperin, D. K. (2008). A Framework for the Study of Personality and Political Behaviour. British Journal of Political Science, 38, 335-362. Retrieved from;jsessionid=673AD5F404C107D7A65D6F6FAB3A15A0.tomcat1?fromPage=online&aid=1701816.

[28] Mondak, J. J. et al. (2010). Personality and Civic Engagement: An Integrative Framework for the Study of Trait Effects on Political Behavior. American Political Science,104 (1), 85-110. Retrieved from doi:

[29] Nikolić, M et al. (2004). Mladi zagubljeni u tranzicii. Beograd: Centar za proučavanje alternative. Retrieved from

[30] Osgood, D. W. et al. (ed.). (2007). On Your Own without a Net: The Transition to Adulthood for Vulnerable Populations. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

[31] Ribeiro, A. E. and Borba, J. (2016). Personality, Political Attitudes and Participation in Protests: The Direct and Mediated Effects of Psychological Factors on Political Activism. Brazilian Political Science Review, 10 (3). Retrieved from

[32] Rot, N. (1987). Osnovi Socijalne Psihologije. Beograd: Zavod za udzbenike i nastavna sredstva.

[33] State Statistical Office. (2018). Active Population in the Republic of Macedonia - Results from the Labor Force Survey, 2017. Skopje: State Statistical Office Skopje.

[34] Verhulst, B. E., Lindon, J. and Hatemi, K. P. (2012). Correlation not Causation: The Relationship between Personality Traits and Political Ideologies. American Journal of Political Science, 56, 34-51.

[35] Znanieck, F. (1994). The Social Role of the University Student. Poznan: Nakom. Retrieved from

[36] Латковиќ, Т. М. и др. (2013). Студија за младите во Република Македонија 2013. Скопје: Фондација Фридрих Еберт

[37] Латковиќ, Т М. и др (2016). Студија за младите во Република Македонија 2016. Скопје: Универзитет „Св Кирил и Методиј“, Институт за социолошки и политичко правни истражувања.

[38] Министерство за образование и наука n.d., Retrieved from

[39] Серафимовска, Е. и др. (2018). Перцепцијата на студентите на УКИМ за нивното организирање и претставување: состојби, проблеми, потреби, модалитети и решенија. Скопје: Универзитет „Св Кирил и Методиј“, Институт за социолошки и политичко правни истражувања.

[40] СПУКИМ n.d., Што е СПУКИМ? URL Retrieved from

[41] Талески, Д. и др. (2006). Истражување за очекувањата на млaдите во Република Македонија. Скопје: Фондација Фридрих Еберт.

[42] УКИМ n.d., Retrieved from

[43] Цветанова, Г. и др (2016) Идентитетите на студентската популација во Република Македонија. Скопје: Универзитет „Св Кирил и Методиј“, Институт за социолошки и политичко правни истражувања.

Journal Information


All Time Past Year Past 30 Days
Abstract Views 0 0 0
Full Text Views 34 34 18
PDF Downloads 23 23 12