Are there sex differences in the body size of the Eurasian red squirrel in Slovakia?

Open access


Sexual dimorphism of the Eurasian red squirrel on five somatic variables (head-and-body length, tail length, hind foot length, ear length and body weight) was evaluated on 55 squirrels. The overlap of values of the measured traits among sexes was high, but in all traits (with exception of the tail length) males seem to exhibit slightly higher mean values than females. However, these differences were non-significant, with the exception of a small significant difference in the tail length and tail-to-head-and-body ratio. Similarly, the results of discriminant function analysis show no differences between the sexes. Positive correlation analyses, together with PCA values, confirmed that tail length and hind foot length are traits that play a significant role in overall variability. We suggest that this relationship could explain their mutual importance in locomotion, where the feet are essential for movement in the trees. By contrast, the tail maintains balance on thin branches, or during jumps from one crown to another. Longer tails also demonstrate differential selection on males and females for a locomotor trait. Similarly, we discuss whether variations in tail length were connected to female reproductive success. Our results suggest that the non-significant results regarding SSD provide the benefit of the same size for both sexes in the protection of territory as well as inter- and intra-sexual interaction.

If the inline PDF is not rendering correctly, you can download the PDF file here.

  • Bauer K. (2001) Red squirrel Sciurus vulgaris Linnaeus 1758. In: Spitzenberger F. (Ed.) Die Säugetierfauna Österreichs Grüne Reihe des Bundesministeriums für Land- und Forstwirtschaft Umwelt und Wasserwirtschaft Band 13 Graz pp. 338-344.

  • Bonduriansky R. & Day T. (2003) The evolution of static allometry in sexually selected traits. Evolution 57 2450-2458.

  • Bonduriansky R. (2007) Sexual selection and allometry: a critical reappraisal of the evidence and ideas. Evolution 61 838-849.

  • Čanády A. Mošanský L. & Krišovský P. (2015) Cranial dimorphism in Eurasian red squirrels Sciurus vulgaris from Slovakia. Zool. Anz. 257 96-102.

  • Degn H.J. (1973) Systematic position age criteria and reproduction of Danish red squirrels (Sciurus vulgaris L.). Dan. Rev. Game Biol. 8 1-24.

  • Fokidis H.B. Risch T.S. & Glenn T.C. (2007) Reproductive and resource benefits to large female body size in a mammal with female-biased sexual size dimorphism. Anim. Behav. 73 479-488.

  • Fokidis H.B. & Risch T.S. (2008) Does gliding when pregnant select for larger females? J. Zool. 275 237-244.

  • Green A. J. (1992) Positive allometry is likely with mate choice competitive display and other functions. Anim. Behav. 43 170-172.

  • Hammer Ø. Harper D.A.T. & Ryan P.D. (2001) PAST: Paleontological statistics software package for education and data analysis Palaeontol. Electron. 4 1-9.

  • Hayssen V. & Kunz T.H. (1996) Allometry of litter mass in bats: maternal size wing morphology and phylogeny. J. Mammal. 77 476-490.

  • Hayssen V. (2008) Patterns of body and tail length and body mass in Sciuridae. J. Mammal. 89 852-873.

  • Koprowski J.L. (2005) Annual cycles in body mass and reproduction of endangered Mt. Graham red squirrels. J. Mammal. 86 309-313.

  • Koprowski J.L. (2007) Alternative reproductive tactics and strategies of tree squirrels. In: Wolff J.O. Sherman P.W. (Eds.) Rodent societies: An ecological and evolutionary perspective. Chicago and London: The University of Chicago Press pp. 86-95.

  • Lindenfors P. Gittelman J.L. & Jones K.E. (2007) Sexual size dimorphism in mammals. In: Fairbairn D.J. Blanckenhorn W.U. Szekely T. (Eds.) Sex size and gender roles: evolutionary studies of sexual size dimorphism. Oxford: Oxford University Press pp. 16-26.

  • Lurz P.W. Garson P.J. & Wauters L.A. (2000) Effects of temporal and spatial variations in food supply on the space and habitat use of red squirrels (Sciurus vulgaris L.). J. Zool. 251 167-178.

  • Lurz P.W.W. Gurnell J. & Magris L. (2005) Sciurus vulgaris. Mammalian Species. 769 1-10.

  • Matějů J. & Kratochvíl L. (2012) Sexual size dimorphism in ground squirrels (Rodentia: Sciuridae: Marmotini) does not correlate with body size and sociality. Front. Zool. 10 1-10.

  • McPehrson F.J. & Chenoweth P.J. (2012) Mammalian sexual dimorphism. Anim. Reprod. Sci. 131 109-122.

  • Mori E. & Lovari S. (2014) Sexual size monomorphism in the crested porcupine (Hystrix cristata). Mamm. Biol. 79 157-160.

  • Nandini R. (2011) Evolution of sexual size dimorphism in squirrels. Ph.D. Dissertation. Auburn University Alabama USA.

  • Petrie M. (1992) Are all secondary sexual display structures positively allometric and if so why? Anim. Behav. 43 173-175.

  • Scheibe J.S. & Robins J.H. (1998) Morphological and performance attributes of gliding mammals. Va. Mus. Nat. Hist. Spec. Publ. 6 131-144.

  • Schulte-Hostedde A.I. Millar J.S. & Hickling G.J. (2001) Sexual dimorphism in body composition of small mammals. Can. J. Zool. 79 1016-1020.

  • Schulte-Hostedde A. Millar J. & Gibbs H. (2002) Female-biased sexual size dimorphism in the yellow-pine chipmunk (Tamias amoenus): sex-specific patterns of annual reproductive success and survival. Evolution 56 2519-2529.

  • Schulte-Hostedde A.I. (2007) Sexual size dimorphism in Rodents. In: Wolff J.O. Sherman P.W. (Eds.) Rodent societies: An Ecological and Evolutionary Perspective. The University of Chicago Press Chicago and London pp. 115-128.

  • Thorington Jr.R.W. Koprowski J.L. Steele M.A. & Whatton J.F. (2012) Squirrels of the World. Johns Hopkins University Press Baltimore Maryland p. 459.

  • Wauters L.A. & Dhondt A.A. (1989a) Body weight longevity and reproductive success in red squirrels (Sciurus vulgaris). J. Anim. Ecol. 58 637-651.

  • Wauters L.A. & Dhondt A.A. (1989b) Variation in length and body mass in red squirrel in two different habitats. J. Zool. 217 93-106.

  • Wauters L. Dhondt A.A. & De Vos R. (1990) Factors affecting male mating success in red squirrels (Sciurus vulgaris). Ethol. Ecol. Evol. 2 195-204.

  • Wauters L.A. & Dhondt A.A. (1992) Spacing behaviour of red squirrels Sciurus vulgaris: variation between habitats and the sexes. Anim. Behav. 43 297-311.

  • Wauters L.A. & Dhondt A.A. (1995) Lifetime reproductive success and its correlates in female Eurasian red squirrels. Oikos 72 402- 410.

  • Wauters L.A. Zaninetti M. Tosi G. & Bertolino S. (2004) Is coat-colour polymorphism in Eurasian red squirrels (Sciurus vulgaris L.) adaptive? Mammalia 68 37-48.

  • Wauters L.A. Vermeulen M. Van Dongen S. Bertolino S. Molinari A. Tosi G. & Matthysen E. (2007) Effects of spatio-temporal variation in food supply on red squirrel Sciurus vulgaris body size and body mass and its consequences for some fitness components. Ecography 30 51-65.

  • Wiltafsky H. (1978) Sciurus vulgaris Linnaeus 1758 – Eichhörnchen. In: Niethammer J. Krapp F. (Eds.) Handbuch der Säugertiere Europas. Band 1 Rodentia 1 (Sciuridae Castoridae Gliridae Muridae). Akademische Verlagsgesellschaft Wiesbaden pp. 86-105.

Journal information
Impact Factor

CiteScore 2018: 0.84

Source Normalized Impact per Paper (SNIP) 2018: 0.365

All Time Past Year Past 30 Days
Abstract Views 0 0 0
Full Text Views 301 105 10
PDF Downloads 131 73 9