Attractiveness of Rural Areas for Young, Educated Women in Post-Industrial Society

Open access

Abstract

Most scholars of rural gender studies do not consider the essential changes in rural economy and life styles, defining rural areas as traditional and conservative. Research is still extremely fragmented into new problems facing the female population in rural areas, those arising from the changes in the lifestyle and the diversified income sources typical of post-industrial rural settlements. This article hence identifies several significant changes in economic and social life in rural areas dealing with the differences between the attractiveness of rural areas as living place for women in the industrial society of the 20th century and the post-industrial society of the 21st century.

The empirical research presented here proves the relevance of post-industrial theory in a real-world environment by testing the validity of several stereotypical opinions about the motivation to live in Lithuanian rural areas from the position of young well-educated people. The analysis of the opinions of young well-educated women reveals that their motivation is rather different from the perceptions of what was important and motivating for finding good living places; these perceptions have otherwise been pointed out by many gender studies based on the industrial society framework. These findings are a call for implementation of new rural policy measures following the higher incidence of young females as rural entrepreneurs, family farm managers, professionals, and local community leaders.

If the inline PDF is not rendering correctly, you can download the PDF file here.

  • Ahl H. 2006 ‘Why research on women entrepreneurs needs new directions’ Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice 30(5): 595-621.

  • Ariztia M. T. Jacobs K. & Manfre C. 2016 ‘Innovative approaches to co-creating equitable policy environments. From collective to co-creative: Experiences implementing gender-responsive local policies’ in Global Forum for Rural Advisory Services (GFRAS) Switzerland pp. 1-6.

  • Bass B. M. & Bass R. 2009 The Bass Handbook of Leadership: Theory Research and Managerial Applications Simon and Schuster.

  • Bem S. L. 1981 Bem Sex-Role Inventory Palo Alto CA: Mind Garden.

  • Bock B. 2015 ‘Gender mainstreaming and rural development policy; the trivialisation of rural gender issues’ Gender Place & Culture 22(5): 731-745.

  • Bruckmeier K. & Kopytina M. A. 2001 ‘Post-traditional or post-modern rurality? Cases from East Germany and Russia’ in L. Granberg I. Kovach & H. Tovey (eds) Europe’s Green Ring. Perspectives on Rural Policy and Planning Aldershot Burlington Singapore Sydney: Ashgate pp. 167–197.

  • Brandth B. 2002 ‘Gender identity in European family farming: A literature review’ Sociologia Ruralis 42(3): 181-200.

  • Cazorla A. De los Ríos I. & Salvo M. 2013 ‘Working With People (WWP)’ in Rural Development Projects: a Proposal from Social Learning Cuadernos de Desarrollo Rural 10(70): 131-157.

  • Cloke P. & Little J. 1997 Contested Countryside Cultures: Otherness Marginalisation and Rurality London: Routledge.

  • Cloke P. 1995 ‘(En)culturing political economy: A life in the day of a ‘rural’ geographer’ in P. Cloke; M. Doel; D. Matless; M. Phillips & N. Thrift (eds) Writing the Rural: Five Cultural Geographies London: PCP pp.19–33.

  • Cloke P. & Milbourne P. 1992 ‘Deprivation and lifestyles in rural Wales: II. Rurality and the cultural dimension’ Journal of Rural Studies 8: 359-371.

  • Commission of the European Communities 2004 Third Report on Economic and Social Cohesion: A New Partnership for Cohesion Convergence Competitiveness and Cooperation Brussels: CEC.

  • Faulkner W. 2000 ‘Dualisms Hierarchies and Gender in Engineering’ Social Studies of Science 30(5): 59–92.

  • Federico G. 2005 Feeding the World: An Economic History of Agriculture 1800–2000 Princeton University Press.

  • Fekete É. & Liptak K. 2011 ‘Postmodern Values in Rural Peripheries’ Journal of Settlements and Spatial Planning 2(1): 1-6.

  • Figueiredo E. 2009 ‘One rural two visions – Environmental issues and images on rural areas in Portugal’ European Countryside 1(1): 9-21.

  • Eičaitė O. 2013 ‘Promotion of sustainable food consumption’ Management Theory and Studies for Rural Business and Infrastructure Development 35(4): 512-521.

  • Eičaitė O. 2016 ‘Lithuanian consumers’ views on country of origin labelling for milk and dairy products’ Scientific Papers Series Management Economic Engineering in Agriculture and Rural Development 16(4): 97–102.

  • Eičaitė O. & Dabkienė V. 2014 ‘Lithuanian consumers’ attitudes and purchasing behaviour towards domestic livestock products’ Scientific Papers Series Management Economic Engineering in Agriculture and Rural Development 14(4): 73–78.

  • Halfacree K. 1993 ‘Locality and social representation: space discourse and alternative definitions of the rural’ Journal of Rural Studies 9(1): 1-15.

  • Hoggart K. Buller H. & Black R. 1995 Rural Europe: Identity and Change London New York Sydney Auckland: Edward Arnold.

  • Inglehart R. & Norris P. 2003 Rising Tide: Gender Equality and Cultural Change around the World Cambridge University Press.

  • Istenič M. Č. 2015 ‘Do rural development programmes promote gender equality on farms? The case of Slovenia’ Gender Place & Culture 22(5): 670-684.

  • Klaß Ch. Report on the situation of women in rural areas of the EU (2007/2117(INI)) Committee on Women’s Rights and Gender Equality. Available: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?pubRef=-//EP//NONSGML+REPORT+A6-2008-0031+0+DOC+PDF+V0//EN

  • Kramarae C. & Spender D. 2000 Routledge International Encyclopedia of Women. Global Women’s Issues and Knowledg New York: Routledge.

  • Michie S. & Nelson D. L. 2006 ‘Barriers women face in information technology careers: Self-efficacy passion and gender biases’ Women in Management Review 21(1): 10-27.

  • Murdoch J. & Pratt A. 1993 ‘Rural studies: Modernism postmodernism and the ‘post-rural’ Journal of Rural Studies 9 (4): 411–427.

  • Nonaka I. & Takeuchi H. 1995 The Knowledge Creating Company. How Japanese Companies Create the Dynamics of Innovation New York: Oxford University Press.

  • O’Connor K. (ed.) 2010 Gender and Women’s Leadership: A Reference Handbook Los Angeles: Sage Publications.

  • OECD 1994. Creating Rural Indicators for Shaping Territorial Policy. OECD Paris.

  • Oedl-Wieser T. 2008 Rural Gender studies in Austria: State of the Art and Future Strategies Universität für Bodenkultur Wien Department für Wirtschafts-und Sozialwiss.

  • Philo C. 1993 ‘Postmodern rural geography? A reply to Murdoch and Pratt’ Journal of Rural Studies 9(4): 429-436.

  • Polanyi M. 1966 The Tacit Dimension. Chapter 1: Tacit Knowing Gloucester: Peter Smith (first published Doubleday & Co 1966 reprinted in 1983).

  • Ramaswamy V. & Ozcan K. 2014 The Co-creation Paradigm Stanford University Press.

  • Regan H. B. & Brooks G. H. 1995 Out of Women’s Experience: Creating Relational Leadership Corwin Press Inc. 2455 Teller Road Thousand Oaks CA.

  • Rinaldi C. 2004 Mediated foodscape. Authenticity experience and the construction of symbolic rurality. Paper presented at the XI Congress of the International Rural Sociology Association Trondheim Norway July 2004 pp. 25–30.

  • Sаbluk H. I. 2015 ‘Social position of woman-peasant on the modern stage of development of rural territories’ Ekonomika APK 10(252): 43-58.

  • Sinclair A. 2014 ‘A feminist case for leadership’ in J. Damousi K. Rubenstein & M. Tomsic (eds) Diversity in Leadership: Australian Women Past and Present ANU Press pp. 17-36.

  • Shortall S. & Bock B. 2015 ‘Introduction: rural women in Europe: the impact of place and culture on gender mainstreaming the European Rural Development Programme’ Gender Place & Culture 22(5): 662-669.

  • Shortall S. & Bock B. 2006 Rural Gender Relations – Issues and Case Studies CABI.

  • Shucksmith M. et al. 2006 First European Quality of Life Survey: Urban-Rural Differences Luxembourg: Office for Official Publications of the European Communities.

  • Sireni M. 2015 ‘Reinventing rural femininities in the post-productivist Finnish countryside’ European Countryside 7(1): 42-56.

  • Vetter L. P. 2010 ‘Overview: Feminist theories of leadership’ in K. O’Connor (ed.) Gender and Women’s Leadership: A Reference Handbook London: Sage Publications pp. 3-10.

  • Vidickienė D. & Melnikienė R. 2014 Kaimo politikos evoliucija [Rural policy evolution] Vilnius: Lietuvos agrarinės ekonomikos institutas.

  • Williams R. 1985 ‘A Problem of Perspective’ in G. Crow (ed.) The Sociology of Rural Communities Volume I pp. 239–243 Cheltenham: Elgar Publishing (reprinted 1996).

  • Williams D. 2005 Real Leadership: Helping People and Organizations Face Their Toughest Challenge. San Francisco: CA: Berrett-Koehler Publishers.

  • Woods M. 2005 Rural Geography London: Sage Publications.

Search
Journal information
Impact Factor

IMPACT FACTOR 2018: 0.391
5-year IMPACT FACTOR: 0.560

CiteScore 2018: 0.33

SCImago Journal Rank (SJR) 2018: 0.129
Source Normalized Impact per Paper (SNIP) 2018: 0.206

Cited By
Metrics
All Time Past Year Past 30 Days
Abstract Views 0 0 0
Full Text Views 327 203 12
PDF Downloads 193 139 12