Politics in the Balkan countryside: case study in Serbia

Open access


Thanks to the field observations conducted on the territory of central Serbia, it was noticed that people in rural environment, beside the optional conversations about weather conditions, most often talk about the politics. The aim of this work was to find out how many people who live in the countryside have the contact with the politics. Hypothesis were made within the communication with several examinees, but they were verified by the poll in which more than 100 persons took part. Data were analyzed by descriptive statistics, using T-test, one-factor analysis of ANOVA variance, and also they were checked by Post-hoc Tukey test. The work task was to find out if gender, age, as well as, professional and regional differences exist in relation to the countryside inhabitants considerations about certain political issues they have been talking about. The importance of this work is to discover whether the distance from urban environments and, life in nature can make a man less interested in and indifferent to the politics.

If the inline PDF is not rendering correctly, you can download the PDF file here.

  • Andersen J. G. Tobiasen M. 2011. ‘Who are these political consumers anyway? Survey evidence from Denmark’. Micheletti Follesdal and Stolle eds Politics Products and Markets 203: 22.

  • Bagozzi R. P. 1981. ‘Evaluating Structural Equation Models with Unobservable Variables and Measurement Error: A Comment’. Journal of Marketing Research 18: 380.

  • Beaman L. Du&o E. Pande R. Topalova P. 2010. Political reservation and substantive representation: Evidence from Indian village councils.

  • Champion T. Watkins C. 1991. People in the countryside: studies of social change in rural Britain. Paul Chapman Publishing Ltd.

  • Čičkarić L. 2009. ‘Politička participacija i reprezentacija žena u zemljama postsocijalističke Evrope’ [Political participation and representation of women in post-socialist countries of Europe] Sociološki pregled Vol. XLIII (3): 343-359.

  • Clarke J. 2010. ‘Enrolling ordinary people: governmental strategies and the avoidance of politics?’ Citizenship studies Vol. 14(6): 637-650.

  • Cross W. Blais A. 2012. ‘Who selects the party leader?’ Party Politics Vol. 18 (2): 127-150.

  • Davies G. Mian T. 2010. ‘The reputation of the party leader and of the party being led’ European Journal of Marketing Vol. 44 (3/4): 331-350.

  • Gupta P. Panagariya A. 2012. ‘Economic Reforms and Election Outcomes’ India’s Reforms: How &ey Produced Inclusive Growth p. 51.

  • Hadjar A. Schlapbach F. 2009. ‘Educational expansion and interest in politics in temporal and cross-cultural perspective: a comparison of West Germany and Switzerland’ European sociological review Vol. 25 (3): 271-286.

  • Hopkin J. 2012. Paying for party response. How Political Parties Respond to Voters p. 176.

  • Einhorn B. 1993. Cinderella Goes to Market: Citizenship Gender and Women’s Movements in East Central Europe. New York: Verso.

  • Kendall C. Nannicini T. Trebbi F. 2013. How do voters respond to information? Evidence from a randomized campaign. No. w18986. National Bureau of Economic Research.

  • Kligman G. 1996. Women and the Negotiation of Identity in Post-communist Eastern Europe. In: Bonnell V. E. (ed.) Identities in Transition University of California Berkeley CA pp. 68-91.

  • Li L. 2011. ‘Distrust in government leaders demand for leadership change and preference for popular elections in rural China’ Political Behavior Vol. 33 (2): 291-311.

  • Pearson E. S. Hartley H. O. (eds) 1966. Biometrika Tables for Statisticians Vol. 1: 146 third edition.

  • Potter C. 1986. ‘Processes of countryside change in lowland England’ Journal of Rural Studies Vol. 2(3): 187-195. Prior M. 2010. ‘You’ve either got it or you don’t? The stability of political interest over the life cycle’ &e Journal of Politics Vol. 72 (03): 747-766.

  • Republika Srbija 2011: Odbornici skupština opština i gradova prema polu i godinama života 2008 Opštine i regioni u Republici Srbiji 2011 [Councilors of the municipalities and cities by gender and age 2008 Municipalities and regions in the Republic of Serbia in 2011] Beograd: Republički zavod za statistiku.

  • Robinson G. 1990. Con(ict and change in the countryside. Rural society economy and planning in the developed world. Belhaven Press.

  • Snedecor G. W. Cochran W. G. 1980. Statistical Methods. Ames Iowa: Iowa State University Press.

  • UGS Nezаvisnost 2001. Žene u Srbiji - dа li smo žrtve diskriminаcije (Women in Serbia - are we victims of discrimination). Beograd http://www.stat.duke.edu/courses/Spring98/sta110c/qtable.html http://www.ipu.org/wmn-e/classif.htm

Journal information
Impact Factor

IMPACT FACTOR 2018: 0.391
5-year IMPACT FACTOR: 0.560

CiteScore 2018: 0.33

SCImago Journal Rank (SJR) 2018: 0.129
Source Normalized Impact per Paper (SNIP) 2018: 0.206

Cited By
All Time Past Year Past 30 Days
Abstract Views 0 0 0
Full Text Views 246 150 2
PDF Downloads 84 58 0