Economic Analysis: Trickling Filter/Activated Sludge or Nitrifying Trickling Filter/Activated Sludge?

Open access

Abstract

The performance and economic simulation and modeling are crucial for accurate and rapid designing, construction, and forecasting future economic needs of municipal wastewater treatment plants (MWWTPs). In this study, combined nitrifying trickling filter/activated sludge (NTF/AS) process was suggested for the modernization of a MWWTP and the performance and economics of MWWTPs based on the combined TF/AS process and combined NTF/AS process were analyzed and compared. In real, the performance, total project construction, total operation labor, total maintenance labor, total material, total chemical, total energy, and total amortization costs of these proposed MWWTPs were calculated and compared. Under the used design criteria and operational conditions in this study, the project construction cost of the MWWTP based on TF/AS was 15.25 % higher than that of the MWWTP based on NTF/AS. Also, MWWTP based on NTF/AS was cost effective and the material and amortization costs for both plants were higher in comparison with the operation, maintenance, energy, and chemical costs. It is necessary to note that this study is a computer simulation for a case and drawing general conclusions only on the basis of this simulation may be insufficient.

If the inline PDF is not rendering correctly, you can download the PDF file here.

  • [l] Koyuncu I. Effect of operating conditions on the separation of ammonium and nitrate ions with nanofiltration and reverse osmosis membranes. J Environ Sci Health. Part A. 2002;37(7):1347-1359. DOI: 10.1081/ESE-120005991.

  • [2] Bodalo A Gomez JL Gomez E Leon G Tejera M. Ammonium removal from aqueous solutions by reverse osmosis using cellulose acetate membranes. Desalination. 2005;184:149-155. DOI: 10.1016/j.desal.2005.03.062.

  • [3] Nourmohammadi D Esmaeeli MB Akbarian H Ghasemian M. Nitrogen removal in a full-scale domestic wastewater treatment plant with activated sludge and trickling Filter. J Environ Public Health. 2013. Article ID 504705: 1-6. DOI: 10.1155/2013/504705.

  • [4] Jafarinejad S. Cost estimation and economical evaluation of three configurations of activated sludge process for a wastewater treatment plant (WWTP) using simulation. Appl Water Sci. 2017;7:2513-2521. DOI: 10.1007/s13201-016-0446-8.

  • [5] Jafarinejad S. Petroleum Waste Treatment and Pollution Control. 1st edition. Oxford: Butterworth-Heinemann; 2017. ISBN: 9780128092439.

  • [6] Jafarinejad S Faraji M Jafari P Mokhtari-Aliabad J. Removal of lead ions from aqueous solutions using novel modified magnetic nanoparticles: optimization isotherm and kinetics studies. Desalin Water Treat. 2017;92:267-274. DOI: 10.5004/dwt.2017.21562.

  • [7] Jafarinejad S. A comprehensive study on the application of reverse osmosis (RO) technology for the petroleum industry wastewater treatment. J Water Environ Nanotech (JWENT). 2017;2(4):243-264. DOI: 10.22090/jwent.2017.04.003.

  • [8] Jafarinejad S Park H Mayton H Walker SL Jiang SC. Concentrating ammonium in wastewater by forward osmosis using a surface modified nanofiltration membrane. Environ Sci Water Res Technol. 2019;5:246-255. DOI: 10.1039/C8EW00690C.

  • [9] Furrer G Wehrli B. Microbial reactions chemical speciation and multicomponent diffusion in porewaters of a eutrophic lake. Geochim Cosmochim Acta. 1996;60:2333-2346. DOI: 10.1016/0016-7037(96)00086-5.

  • [10] Vucebic S. The mechanism of gold extraction and copper precipitation from low grade ores in cyanide ammonia systems. Miner Eng. 1997;10:309-326. DOI: 10.1016/S0892-6875(97)00007-1.

  • [11] Balci S Dincel Y. Ammonium ion adsorption with sepiolite: use of transient uptake method. Chem Eng Process. 2002;41:70-85. DOI: 10.1016/S0255-2701(01)00104-0.

  • [12] AWWA Water Quality and Treatment. New York: McGraw-Hill; 1990. ISBN: 0070015406.

  • [13] Helmer C Tromn C Hippen H Rosenwinkel KH Seyfried CF Kunst S. Single stage biological nitrogen removal by nitritation and anaerobic ammonium oxidation in biofilm systems. Water Sci Technol. 2001;43:311-320. DOI: 10.2166/wst.2001.0062.

  • [14] Sedlack R. Phosporous and Nitrogen Removal from Municipal Wastewater: Principles and Practice. 2nd ed. New York: Lewis Publisher; 1991. ISBN: 9780873716833.

  • [15] Jorgensen TC Weatherley LR. Ammonia removal from wastewater by ion exchange in the presence of organic contaminants. Water Res. 2003;37:1723-1728. DOI: 10.1016/S0043-1354(02)00571-7.

  • [16] Bernal MP Lopez-Real JM. Natural zeolites and sepiolite as ammonium and ammonia adsorbent materials. Biores Technol. 1993;43:27-33. DOI: 10.1016/0960-8524(93)90078-P.

  • [17] Noworyta A Koziol T Trusek-Holownia A. A system for cleaning condensates containing ammonium nitrate by the reverse osmosis method. Desalination. 2003;156:397-402. DOI: 10.1016/S0011-9164(03)00373-4.

  • [18] Reig M Licon E Gibert O Yaroshchuk A Cortina JL. Rejection of ammonium and nitrate from sodium chloride solutions by nanofiltration: Effect of dominant-salt concentration on the trace-ion rejection. Chem Eng J. 2016;303:401-408. DOI: 10.1016/j.cej.2016.06.025.

  • [19] Mannina G Viviani G. Hybrid moving bed biofilm reactors: an effective solution for upgrading a large wastewater treatment plant. Water Sci Technol. 2009;60(5):1103-1116. DOI: 10.2166/wst.2009.416.

  • [20] Gernaey KV van Loosdrecht MCM Henze M Lind M Jørgensen SB. Activated sludge wastewater treatment plant modelling and simulation: state of the art. Environ Model Software. 2004;19:763-783. DOI: 10.1016/j.envsoft.2003.03.005.

  • [21] Nasr MS Moustafa MAE Seif HAE Kobrosy GE. Modelling and simulation of German BIOGEST/EL-AGAMY wastewater treatment plants-Egypt using GPS-X symulator. Alexandria Eng J. 2011;50(4):351-357. DOI: 10.1016/j.aej.2011.05.003.

  • [22] Lester JN Soares A Martin DS Harper P Jefferson B Brigg J et al. A novel approach to the anaerobic treatment of municipal wastewater in temperate climates through primary sludge fortification. Environ Technol. 2009;30(10):985-994. DOI: 10.1080/09593330903029424.

  • [23] Jafarinejad S. Simulation for the performance and economic evaluation of conventional activated sludge process replacing by sequencing batch reactor technology in a petroleum refinery wastewater treatment plant. Chem Engineering. 2019;3(2):45. DOI: 10.3390/chemengineering3020045.

  • [24] Zahid WM. Cost analysis of trickling-filtration and activated-sludge plants for the treatment of municipal wastewater. Proceedings of the 7th Saudi Engineering Conference. College of Engineering King Saud University Riyadh 2-5 Dec. 2007;1-15. https://pdfs.semanticscholar.org/e741/643ada211598202efec053f21e10f0dc7cf6.pdf.

  • [25] Drewnowski J Remiszewska-Skwarek A Fernandez-Morales FJ. Model based evaluation of plant improvement at a large wastewater treatment plant (WWTP). J Environ Sci Health Part A. 2018;53(7):669-675. DOI: 10.1080/10934529.2018.1438821.

  • [26] Daigger GT Boltz JP. Trickling filter and trickling filter-suspended growth process design and operation: A state-of-the-art review. Water Environ Res. 2011;83(5):388-404. DOI: 10.2175/106143010x12681059117210.

  • [27] Mohagheghian A Nabizadeh R Mesdghinia A Rastkari N Mahvi AH Alimohammadi M et al. Distribution of estrogenic steroids in municipal wastewater treatment plants in Tehran Iran. J Environ Health Sci Eng. 2014;12:1-7. DOI: 10.1186/2052-336X-12-97.

  • [28] Wik T. Trickling filters and biofilm reactor modeling. Rev Environ Sci Bio/Technol. 2003;2:193-212. DOI: 10.1023/B:RESB.0000040470.48460.bb.

  • [29] United States Environmental Protection Agency (US EPA). Wastewater technology fact sheet Trickling filters United States Environmental Protection Agency Office of Water Washington D.C. EPA 832-F-00-014 September 2000. https://www3.epa.gov/npdes/pubs/trickling_filter.pdf.

  • [30] United States Environmental Protection Agency (US EPA). Wastewater technology fact sheet Trickling filters nitrification United States Environmental Protection Agency Office of Water Washington D.C. EPA 832-F-00-015 September 2000. https://www3.epa.gov/npdes/pubs/trickling_filt_nitrification.pdf.

  • [31] Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) Waste water treatment manuals primary secondary and tertiary treatment 1997. http://www.epa.ie/pubs/advice/water/wastewater/EPA_water_%20treatment_manual_primary_secondary_tertiary1.pdf.

  • [32] Parker DS Jacobs T Bower E Stowe DW Farmer G. Maximizing trickling filter nitrification through biofilm control: research review and full scale application. Water Sci Technol. 1997;36(1):255-259. DOI: 10.1016/S0273-1223(97)00332-6.

  • [33] Hydromantis Environmental Software Solutions Inc. CapdetWorks V4.0: State-of-the-art software for the design and cost estimation of wastewater treatment plants. User’s Guide 2018. https://www.hydromantis.com/.

  • [34] United States Environmental Protection Agency (US EPA). Process design and cost estimating algorithms for the computer assisted procedure for the design and evaluation of wastewater treatment systems (CAPDET Design Manual). Cullinane Jr. Harris editor. Sun U.S. EPA Office of Water Program Operations Washington D.C 1982. https://apps.dtic.mil/dtic/tr/fulltext/u2/a115314.pdf.

  • [35] World Bank Group. Environmental Health and Safety (EHS) Guidelines. General EHS guidelines: Environmental wastewater and ambient water quality. 2007;1-8. https://www.ifc.org/wps/wcm/connect/026dcb004886583db4e6f66a6515bb18/1-3%2BWastewater%2Band%2BAmbient%2BWater%2BQuality.pdf?MOD=AJPERES.

Search
Journal information
Impact Factor

IMPACT FACTOR 2018: 1.467
5-year IMPACT FACTOR: 1.226

CiteScore 2018: 1.47

SCImago Journal Rank (SJR) 2018: 0.352
Source Normalized Impact per Paper (SNIP) 2018: 0.907

Metrics
All Time Past Year Past 30 Days
Abstract Views 0 0 0
Full Text Views 75 75 7
PDF Downloads 40 40 3