The Effect of Ionic Liquids With (–)-Menthol Derivative Containing a Chloride Anion to Weed

Open access

Abstract

Weeds constitute a huge group of undesirable plants, widespread throughout the world. They represent a big problem for most farmers, who implement different methods to fight against them. Thanks to their wide occurrence, weeds however, can be an excellent indicator of the quality of soil and the whole environment where they are present. In this paper, we present the impact of four alkylimidazolium chlorides with a natural terpene component introduced into the soil: (1R,2S,5R)-(–)-menthol and alkyl substituents containing 1, 4, 9 or 12 carbon atoms, on the growth and development of selected weed species. Compounds with the highest phytotoxic activity towards gallant soldier, white goosefoot and common sorrel were chlorides with methyl and butyl substituents, while compounds with nonyl and dodecyl substituents demonstrated a weak effect on these weeds. Phytotoxicity of the salts tested was largely dependent on the applied concentration of the compound and the genetic make-up of plant species used in the experiment. This was reflected in the inhibition of plants’ length and their roots, as well as changes in the content of dry matter and photosynthetic pigments.

If the inline PDF is not rendering correctly, you can download the PDF file here.

  • [1] Duke SO. Herbicide - Resistant Crops: Agricultural Environmental Economic Regulatory and Technical Aspects Boca Raton: Lewis Publisher; 1996.

  • [2] Choudhary SP Sharma DK. Internat J Pharmacogn. 2014;1(9):545-552. DOI: 10.13040/IJPSR.0975-8232.IJP.1(9).545-52.

  • [3] Tuazon-Nartea J Savage G. Food Nutr Sci. 2013;4:838-843. DOI: 10.4236/fns.2013.48109.

  • [4] Poonia A Upadhayay A. J Food Sci Technol. 2015;52(7):3977-3985. DOI: 10.1007/s13197-014-1553-x.

  • [5] Bazylko A Boruc K Borzym J Kiss AK. Phytochem. Lett. 2015;11:394-398. DOI: 10.1016/j.phytol.2014.11.005.

  • [6] Niemczak M Giszter R Czerniak K Marcinkowska K Walkiewicz F. RSC Adv. 2015;5:15487-15493. DOI: 10.1039/c4ra16151c.

  • [7] Kimura O Tsukagoshi K Endo T. Toxicol Lett. 2009;189:102-109. DOI:10.1016/j.toxlet.2009.05.006.

  • [8] Pernak J Niemczak M Materna K Żelechowski K Marcinkowska K Praczyk T. RSC Adv. 2016. DOI: 10.1039/C5RA23997D.

  • [9] Polit JT Praczyk T Pernak J Sobiech Ł Jakubiak E Skrzypczak G. Acta Physiol Plant. 2014;36:699-711. DOI: 10.1007/s11738-013-1448-x.

  • [10] Cojocaru OA Shamshina JL Gurau G Syguda A Praczyk T Pernak J et al. Green Chem. 2013;15:2110-2120. DOI: 10.1039/C3GC37143C.

  • [11] Pernak J Niemczak M Materna K Marcinkowska K Praczyk T. Tetrahedron. 2013;69:4665-4669. DOI: 10.1016/j.tet.2013.03.097.

  • [12] Pernak J Feder-Kubis J Cieniecka-Rosłonkiewicz A Fischmeister C Grifin ST Rogers RD. New J Chem. 2007;31:879-892. DOI: 10.1039/b616215k.

  • [13] Feder-Kubis J Bryjak J. Acta Biochim Pol. 2013;60:741-745. www.actabp.pl.

  • [14] Oren R Werk KS Buchmann N Zimmermann R. Can J For Res. 1993;23:1187-1195. DOI: 10.1139/x93-150.

  • [15] Rychter P Kot M Bajer K Rogacz D Šišková A Kapuśniak J. Carbohydr Polym. 2016;137:127-138. DOI: 10.1016/j.carbpol.2015.10.0510.

  • [16] Chapman N Miller AJ Lindsey K Whalley WR. Trends Plant Sci. 2012;17:701-710. DOI: 10.1016/j.tplants.2012.08.001.

  • [17] Peric B Sierra J Martí E Cruañas R Garau MA. Chemosphere. 2014;108:418-425. DOI: 10.1016/j.chemosphere.2014.02.043.

  • [18] Biczak R. J Hazard Mater. 2016;304:173-185. DOI: 10.1016/j.jhazmat.2015.10.055.

  • [19] Pawłowska B Biczak R. Chemosphere. 2016;149:24-33. DOI: 10.1016/j.chemosphere.2016.01.072.

  • [20] Biczak R Pawłowska B Feder-Kubis J. Environ Sci Pollut Res. 2015;22:11740-11754. DOI: 10.1007/s11356-015-4327-8.

  • [21] Matzke M Stolte S Böschen A Filser J. Green Chem. 2008;10:784-792. DOI: 10.1039/b802350f.

  • [22] Stepnowski P Mrozik W Nichthauser J. Environ Sci Technol. 2007;41:511-516. DOI: 10.1021/es062014w.

  • [23] Cvjetko Bubalo M Hanousek K Radošević K Srček VG Jakovljević T Radojčić Redovniković I. Ecotox Environ Saf. 2014;101:116-123. DOI: 10.1016/j.ecoenv.2013.12.022.

  • [24] Studzińska S Kowalkowski T Buszewski B. J Hazard Mater. 2009;186:1542-1547. DOI: 10.1016/j.jhazmat.2009.03.029.

  • [25] Mrozik W Jungnickel C Paszkiewicz M Stepnowski P. Water Air Soil Pollut. 2013;224:1759-1765. DOI: 10.1007/s11270-013-1759-y.

  • [26] Liu H Zhang S Hu X Chen C. Environ Pollut. 2013;181:242-249. DOI: 10.1016/j.envpol.2013.06.007.

  • [27] Wang L-S Wang L Wang L Wang G Li Z-H Wang J-J. Environ Toxicol. 2009;24:296-303. DOI: 10.1002/tox.20435.

  • [28] Liu T Zhu L Xie H Wang J Wang J Sun F et al. Environ Sci Pollut Res. 2014;21:3936-3945. DOI: 10.1007/s11356-013-2348-8.

  • [29] Liu H Zhang S Zhang X Chen C. J Hazard Mater. 2015;286:440-448. DOI: 10.1016/j.hazmat.2015.01.008.

  • [30] Ma J-M Cai L-L Zhang B-J Hu L-W Li X-Y Wang J-J. Ecotoxicol Environ Saf. 2010;73:1465-1469. DOI: 10.1016/j.ecoenv.2009.10.004.

  • [31] Zhang B Li X Chen D Wang J. Protoplasma. 2013;250:103-110. DOI: 10.1007/s00709-012-0379-5.

  • [32] Liu T Zhu L Wang J Wang J Xie H. J Hazard Mater. 2015;285:27-36. DOI: 10.1016/j.hazmat.2014.11.028.

  • [33] Stupnicka-Rodzynkiewicz E Dabkowska T Stoklosa A Hura T Dubert F Lepiarczyk A. J Plant Dis Prot. 2006;Special issue XX:479-486.

  • [34] Yao S Chen S Xu D Lan H. Plant Growth Regul. 2010;60:115-125. DOI: 10.1007/s10725-009-9426-4.

  • [35] Arias-Baldrich C Bosch N Begines D Feria AB Monreal JA García-Mauriño S. J Plant Physiol. 2015;183:121-129. DOI: 10.1016/j.jplph.2015.05.016.

  • [36] Gengmao Z Yu H Xing S Shihui L Quanmei S Changhai W. Ind Crops Prod. 2015;64:175-181. DOI: 10.1016/j.indcrop.2014.10.058.

  • [37] Biczak R Telesiński A Pawłowska B. Plant Physiol Biochem. 2016;107:248-256. DOI: 10.1016/j.plaphy.2016.05.016.

Search
Journal information
Impact Factor

IMPACT FACTOR 2018: 1.467
5-year IMPACT FACTOR: 1.226

CiteScore 2018: 1.47

SCImago Journal Rank (SJR) 2018: 0.352
Source Normalized Impact per Paper (SNIP) 2018: 0.907

Metrics
All Time Past Year Past 30 Days
Abstract Views 0 0 0
Full Text Views 154 68 3
PDF Downloads 97 57 3