In-Situ Combination of Bio and Abio Remediation of Chlorinated Ethenes

Open access

Abstract

This article deals with combined abio-bioreductive methods for in-situ removal of chlorinated ethenes. The method is based on the use of bioremediation supported by lactate and chemical reduction using nZVI. The method is compared with the use of the individual methods alone, mainly with nZVI. In an environment with very low permeability a poor contaminant removal efficiency was achieved during repeated application of nZVI (about 50% of the original content of contamination). Separate application of lactate resulted in conversion of PCE to 1,2-cis-DCE, whose degradation occurred very slowly. When using the combined abio-bioreductive method, based on consecutive application of lactates and nZVI, over 75% of the original content of contamination was removed. This article discusses not only the changes in concentrations of contaminants but also pH and ORP. Both methods are also compared from an economic point of view.

[1] Mueller NC, Nowack B. Nano zero-valent iron - THE solution for water and soil remediation? Report of the Observatory NANO 2010. [online]. [cit. 25.2.2013]. Available from http://www.observatorynano.eu/project/filesystem/files/nZVI_final_vsObservatory.pdf

[2] Zhang W, Elliot DW. Remediation. 2006;16(2):23. DOI: 10.1002/rem.20078.

[3] Zhang WX. J Nanoparticle Res. 2003;5(3-4):323-332.

[4] Arnold W, Roberts L. Environ Sci Technol. 2000;34:1794-1805. DOI: 10.1021/es990884q.

[5] Lien H, Zhang W-X. Colloid Surfaces. 2001;191:97-105. DOI: 10.1016/S0927-7757(01)00767-1.

[6] Phenrat T, Saleh N, Sirk K, Tilton R, Lowry G. Environ. Sci Technol. 2007;41:284-290. DOI: 10.1021/es061349a.

[7] Liu Y, Majetich SA, Tilton RD, Sholl DS, Lowry GV. Environ Sci Technol. 2005;39:1338-1345, DOI: 10.1021/es049195r.

[8] Song H, Carraway ER. Appl Catalysis B: Environmental. 2008;78:53-60. DOI: 10.1016/apcatb.2007.07.034.

[9] Song H, Carraway ER. Environ Sci Technol. 2005;39:6237-6245. DOI: 10.1021/es048262e.

[10] Xu Y, Zhang W. Ind Eng Chem Res. 2000;39(7):2238-2244. DOI: 10.1021/ie9903588.

[11] Chuang FW, Larson RA, Wessman MS. Environ Sci Technol. 1995;29:2460-2463. DOI: 10.21/es00009a044.

[12] Wang C, Zhang W-X. Environ Sci Technol. 1997;31:2154-2156. DOI: 10.1021/es970039c.

[13] Dries J, Bastiaens L, Sringael D, Agathos SN, Diels L. Environ Sci Technol. 2005;39:8460-8465. DOI: 10.1021/es050251d.

[14] Kanel SR, Manning B, Charlet L, Choi H. Environ Sci Technol. 2005;39:1291-1298. DOI: 10.1021/es048991u.

[15] Ponder SM, Darab JG, Mallouk TE. Environ Sci Technol. 2004;34:2564-2569. DOI: 10.1021/es9911420.

[16] Liu Y, Lowry GW. Environ Sci Technol. 2006;40:6085-6090. DOI: 10.1021/es0606850.

[17] Karn B, Kuiken T, Otto M. Environ Health Perspectiv. 2009;117:1823-1831. DOI: 10.1289/ehp.0900793.

[18] Wiedermeier TH, Rifai HS, Newell CJ, Wilson JT. Natural Attenuation of Fuels and Chlorinated Solvents in the Subsurface. New York: John Willey & Sons; 1999.

[19] DiStefano TD, Gosset JM, Zinder SH. Appl Environ Microb. 1992;58:3622-3629.

[20] Fennel DE, Gossett JM, Zinder SH. Environ Sci Technol. 1997;31:918-926. DOI: 10.1021/es960756r.

[21] Amos BK, Suchomel EJ, Pennel KD, Löffler FE. Water Res. 2008;42:2963-2974. DOI:10.1016/j.watres.2008.03.15.

[22] Maymó-Gatell X, Anguish T, Zinder SH. Appl Environ Microb. 1999;65:3108-3113.

[23] Cupples AM, Spormann AM, McCarty PL. Environ Sci Technol. 2004;38:1102-1107. DOI: 10.1021/es0348647.

[24] Lampron J, Chiu PC, Cha DK. Bioremed J. 1998;2:175-181. DOI: 10.1080/10889869809380375.

[25] Lampron J, Chiu PC, Cha DK. Water Res. 2001;35:3077-3084. DOI: 10.1016/S0043-1354(01)00017-3.

[26] Fernandez-Sanchez JM, Sawvel EJ, Alvarez PJJ. Chemosphere. 2004;54:823-829. DOI: 10.1016/j.chemosphere.2003.08.037.

[27] Wang SM, Tseng SK. Biores Technol. 2008;100:111-117. DOI: 10.1016/j.biortech.2008.05.003.

[28] Rosenthal H, Adrian L, Steiof M. Chemosphere. 2004;55:661-669. DOI: 10.1016/j.chemosphere.2003.11.053.

[29] Ondra E. Actualized risk assessment of old environmental liabilities in Karbox. (Aktualizace analýzy rizika starých ekologických zátěží v areálu Karbox), Hořice: Kar-Box, s.r.o.; 2006.

Ecological Chemistry and Engineering S

The Journal of Society of Ecological Chemistry and Engineering

Journal Information


IMPACT FACTOR 2017: 0.7
5-year IMPACT FACTOR: 0.815

CiteScore 2017: 0.79

SCImago Journal Rank (SJR) 2017: 0.227
Source Normalized Impact per Paper (SNIP) 2017: 0.535

Metrics

All Time Past Year Past 30 Days
Abstract Views 0 0 0
Full Text Views 136 136 26
PDF Downloads 56 56 13