Finite Element Tearing and Interconnecting Method and its Algorithms for Parallel Solution of Magnetic Field Problems

Open access


Because of the exponential increase of computational resource requirement for numerical field simulations of more and more complex physical phenomena and more and more complex large problems in science and engineering practice, parallel processing appears to be an essential tool to handle the resulting large-scale numerical problems. One way of parallelization of sequential (singleprocessor) finite element simulations is the use of domain decomposition methods. Domain decomposition methods (DDMs) for parallel solution of linear systems of equations are based on the partitioning of the analyzed domain into sub-domains which are calculated in parallel while doing appropriate data exchange between those sub-domains. In this case, the non-overlapping domain decomposition method is the Lagrange multiplier based Finite Element Tearing and Interconnecting (FETI) method. This paper describes one direct solver and two parallel solution algorithms of FETI method. Finally, comparative numerical tests demonstrate the differences in the parallel running performance of the solvers of FETI method. We use a single-phase transformer and a three-phase induction motor as twodimensional static magnetic field test problems to compare the solvers

  • [1] M. Kuczmann, A. Iványi, The Finite Element Method in Magnetics. Budapest, Academic Press, 2008.

  • [2] J. Luomi, Finite Element Methods for Electrical Machines (lecture Notes for postgraduate course in electrical machines). Chalmers University of Technology, Göteborg, 1993.

  • [3] J. Kruis, Domain Decomposition Methods for Distributed Computing. Kippen, Stirling, Scotland, Saxe-Coburg Publication, 2006.

  • [4] C. Farhat, F. X. Roux, "A method of Finite Element Tearing and Interconnecting and its parallel solution algorithm", International Journal for Numerical Methods in Engineering, vol. 32, pp. 1205-1227, 1991.

  • [5] D. J. Rixen, C. Farhat, R. Teuzar, J. Mandel, "Theoretical comparison of the FETI and algebraically partitioned FETI methods, and performance comparison with a direct sparse solver", International Journal for Numerical Methods in Engineering, vol 46, pp. 501-533, 1999.

  • [6] D. Marcsa, M. Kuczmann, "Comparison of domain decomposition methods for elliptic partial differential problems with unstructured meshes", Przeglad Elektrotechniczny, vol. 12b, pp. 1-4, 2012.

  • [7] Y. Saad, Iterative Methods for Sparse Linear Systems. 3rd edition, Philadelphia, PA, SIAM, 2003.

  • [8] R. Barrett, M. Berry, T. F. Chan, J. Demmel, J. M. Donato, J. Dongara, V. Eijkhout, R. Pozo, C. Romine, H. V. der Vorst, Templates for the Solution of Linear Systems: Boulding Blocks for Iterative Methods. Philadelphia, PA, SIAM, 1994

  • [9] C. Farhat, K. Pierson, M. Lesionne, "The second generation FETI methods and their application to the parallel solution of large-scale linear and geometrically non-linear structural analysis problems", Computer Methods in Applied Mechanics and Engineering, vol. 184, pp. 333-374, 2000.

  • [10] (Accessed November 27, 2012)

  • [11] C. Geuzaine, J.F. Remacle, "Gmsh: a three-dimensional finite element mesh generator with built-in pre- and post-processing facilities", International Journal for Numerical Methods in Engineering, vol. 79, pp. 1309-1331, 2009.

  • [12] (Accessed November 20, 2012).

  • [13] P. Gosselet, C. Rey, D. J. Rixen, "On the initial estimate of interface forces in FETI methods", Computer Methods in Applied Mechanics and Engineering, vol. 192, pp. 2749-2764, 2003.

  • [14] F. Magoulés, F. X. Roux, "Algorithms and theory for substructuring and domain decomposition methods'', in Mesh Partitioning Techniques and Domain Decomposition Methods, F. Magoulés, Eds, Kippen, Stirling, Scotland: Saxe-Coburg Publications, 2007, pp. 89-118.

  • [15] H. Kanayama, S.-I. Sugimoto, ''Effectiveness of A-φ method in a parallel computing with an iterative domain decomposition method'', IEEE Transactions on Magnetics, vol. 42, pp. 539-542, 2006.

  • [16] Y. Fragakis, M. Papadrakakis, "The mosaic of high performance domain decomposition methods for structural mechanics: formulation, interrelation and numerical efficiency of primal and dual methods", Computer Methods in Applied Mechanics and Engineering, vol. 192, pp. 3799-3830, 2003.

  • [17] N. Bianchi, Electrical Machine Analysis Using Finite Elements, Taylor & Francis, Boca Rotan, FL, USA, 2005.

  • [18] A. F. P. Camargos, R. M. S. Batalha, C. A. P. S. Martins, E.J. Silva, G. L. Soares, ''Superlinear speedup in a 3-D parallel conjugate gradient solver'', IEEE Transactions on Magnetics, vol. 45, pp. 1602-1605, 2009.

Electrical, Control and Communication Engineering

The Journal of Riga Technical University

Journal Information


All Time Past Year Past 30 Days
Abstract Views 0 0 0
Full Text Views 33 33 18
PDF Downloads 3 3 2