Differences in organic matter quality, chemical and microbiological characteristics of two Phaeozems under natural and anthropic influence

Open access


The soil degraded and changed by the anthropic activity must be monitored and the awareness of the intrinsic processes will allow a pertinent analysis of the effects of the application of the new technologies on the management and the sustainability of the soil.

Two natural and anthropic Phaeozems were analyzed from the point of view of chemical, microbiological characteristics, quality and composition of organic compounds.

Total values of microbial biomass and bacterial and fungal counts were generally twice higher in Calcaric Phaeozems than in Verti-Stagnic Phaeozems.

The content of humic precursors in Calcaric Phaeozems was quantitatively higher than that determined in Verti-stagnic Phaeozems, with a total content of phenols of 14.6mgGAExg−1d.m., polysaccharides and proteins of 97mgxg−1, respectivelly 16.6mgxl−1.

The ascending chromatograms showed specific distribution and higher density of the organic compounds in the CAFT sub-fraction of the Verti-stagnic Phaeozems. Pfeiffer specific chromatograms revealed an enzyme activity much higher than average at the Verti-stagnic Phaeozems, with a well-characterized functional diversity. The nutritional reserve appeared increased but poorly diversified in the Calcaric Phaeozems. Humification processes are intense, colloidal substances are present, the mineral component is very well integrated in the organic material at the Verti-stagnic Phaeozems and complex protein content is well revealed especially in the Calcaric Phaeozems.

Capillary dynamolysis reflected a characteristic pattern of Phaeozems soils, with particularities for each soil type, represented by colors, contours and particular forms of the specific structures developed.

Both soils presented good conditions for sustaining vegetation either natural or cultivated but results indicated that anthropic intervention determined a more dynamic mineralization of organic matter. Further monitoring of soil organic matter dynamics is needed and adjusting management practices for conservation of biodiversity and global ecosystem protection against the effect of anthropic intervention.

If the inline PDF is not rendering correctly, you can download the PDF file here.

  • 1. Angst G Mueller KE Kögel-Knaber I Freeman KH Mueller CW. Aggregation controls the stability of lignin and lipids in clay-sized particulate and mineral associated organic matter. Biogeochem 2017; 132: 307–324.

  • 2. Pavlů L Mühlhanselová M. Differences in Humic Acids Structure of Various Soil Types Studied by DRIFT Spectroscopy. Soil Water Res 2018;13(1): 29–35.

  • 3. Weil RR Brady NC. The Nature and Properties of Soils. Edition:15th Publisher: Pearson Education 2016.

  • 4. Jokic A Wang MC Liu C Frenkel AI Huang PM. Integration of the polyphenol and Maillard reactions into a unified abiotic pathway for humification in nature: the role of δ-MnO2. Org Geochem 2004; 35: 747-762.

  • 5. Zhang Y Yue D Ma H. Darkening mechanism and kinetics of humification process in catechol-Maillard system. Chemosphere 2015;130: 40-45.

  • 6. Matei S Matei GM Dumitru S Ignat P. Research on the role of microbial consortium in biosynthesis of humic precursors based on secondary metabolites. Ann Univ Craiova – Agriculture Montanology Cadastre 2016; 46: 348-356.

  • 7. López-González JA Suárez-Estrella F Vargas-García MC López MJ Jurado MM Moreno J. Dynamics of bacterial microbiota during lignocellulosic waste composting: studies upon its structure functionality and biodiversity. Bioresour Technol 2015;175: 406-416.

  • 8. Rigane H. Chtourou M Mahmoud IB Medhioub K Ammar E. Polyphenolic compounds progress during olive mill wastewater sludge and poultry manure co-composting and humic substances building (Southeastern Tunisia). Waste Manage Res 2015; 33: 73-80.

  • 9. Dumitru M Manea A(coord). Methods of chemical and microbiological analysis (utilized in soil monitoring system) (in Romanian) Ed. SITECH Craiova 2011.

  • 10. Papacostea P. Biologia Solului (Soil Biology). Bucharest RO: Scientific and Encyclopaedic Publishing House 1976.

  • 11. Matei S. Determination of soil respiration and microbial biomass. In: Dumitru M Manea A (coord.). Methods of chemical and microbiological analysis (utilized in soil monitoring system) (in Romanian). Ed. SITECH Craiova 2011: 283-288.

  • 12. Bergey DH Holt JG. Bergey’s Manual of Determinative Bacteriology. 9th Ed Baltimore: Williams and Wilkins. U.S.A. 1994.

  • 13. Domsch KH Gams W. Fungi in agricultural soils. Vol 1-2 eds.T&A Constable Ltd.Edinburg London 1970.

  • 14. Watanabe T. Pictorial Atlas of Soil and Seed Fungi: Morphologies of Cultured Fungi and Key to Species 2nd ed. CRC PRESS Boca Raton London New York Washington D.C. 2002.

  • 15. Sadej W Zolnowski AC Marczuk O. Content of phenolic compounds in soils originating from two long-term fertilization experiments. Arch Environ Prot 2016; 42(4): 104-113.

  • 16. Lowe LE. Total and Labile Polysaccharide Analysis of Soils. In: MR Carter (ed.) Soil Sampling and Methods of Analysis Lewis Publishers CRC Press Boca Raton 1993; 373-376.

  • 17. Bradford MM. A rapid sensitive method for the quantification of microgram quantities of protein utilizing the principle of protein-Dye Binding. Anal Biochem 1976; 72:248-254.

  • 18. Kononova MN Belcikova NP. Uskorenâe metodâ opredelnia sostava gummusa mineralnâh pociv. Pocive-denie 1961;10: 75-87.

  • 19. Zalecka A Kahl J Doesburg P Pyskow B Huber M Skjerbaek Ploeger A. Standardization of the Steigbild Method. Biol Agr Hort 2010; 27: 41-57.

  • 20. Vasu A Neacşu M Daniliuc D. Ecopedological Characterization of grassland representative units from mountain regions for establishing requirements for improvement technologies Lucr St ICPCP Măgurele Braşov Vol.IX Bucharest 1986.

  • 21. Florea N Bălăceanu V Răuță C Canarache A. (red coord) Methodology for elaboration of pedologic studies Part III Ecopedological Parameters (in Romanian) MA ASAS ICPA Bucharest 1987.

  • 22. Ponomarenko EV Anderson DW. Importance of charred organic matter in Black Chernozem soils of Saskatchewan”. Can J Soil Sci 2001;81(3): 285–297.

  • 23. Piccolo A. The Supramolecular structure of humic substances. A novel understanding of humus chemistry and implications in soil science. Adv Agron 2002; 75:57–134.

  • 24. Muscolo A Sidari M Nardi S. Humic substance: relationship between structure and activity. deeper information suggests univocal findings. J Geochem Exp 2013; 129: 57–63.

  • 25. Inderjit Mallik AU. Effect of phenolic compounds on selected soil properties. Forest Ecol Manag 1997; 92(1-3): 11–18.

  • 26. Hoostal MJ Bouzat JL. The modulating role of dissolved organic matter on spatial patterns of microbial metabolism in Lake Erie sediments. Microb Ecol 2008; 55(2): 358–368.

  • 27. Meier CL Bowman WD. Phenolic-rich leaf carbon fractions differentially influence microbial respiration and plant growth. Oecologia 2008; 158(1): 95–107.

  • 28. Cheshire MV. Origin and stability of soil polysaccharides. J Soil Sci 1977; 28:1-10.

  • 29. Schimel PJ Weintraub MN. Interactions between Carbon and Nitrogen Mineralization and Soil Organic Matter Chemistry in Arctic Tundra Soils. Ecosystems 2003; 6(2): 0129-0143.

  • 30. Min K Freeman C Kang H Choi SU. The regulation by phenolic compounds of soil organic matter dynamics under changing environment. Bio Med Res Int 2015; ID 825098 11pages https://doi.org/10.1155/2015/825098

Journal information
All Time Past Year Past 30 Days
Abstract Views 0 0 0
Full Text Views 40 40 40
PDF Downloads 26 26 26