The effect of board of directors characteristics on risk and bank performance: Evidence from Turkey

  • 1 Gaziantep University, Faculty of Economics and Administrative Sciences, Department of Business Administration, Gaziantep—27310, Turkey
  • 2 Gaziantep University, Faculty of Economics and Administrative Sciences, Department of Business Administration, Gaziantep—27310, Turkey

Abstract

A bank, particularly in developing countries like Turkey, is one of the most important institutions in the financial sector. Therefore knowing the factors affecting the performance of banks is important for the development of the sector. One of the factors affecting the risk and profitability of banking sector is the internal factors of the banks. The aim of this paper is to investigate the board of directors’ characteristics and its effect on risk level measured by non-performing loans and on bank performance measured by asset profitability using the Generalized Method of Moments (GMM) estimator. Data from nineteen deposit banks for the period 2012–2018 were used. The result of the study determined that the board size, foreign board members and the independent board members have an effect on both non-performing loans and the return on assets.

Falls das inline PDF nicht korrekt dargestellt ist, können Sie das PDF hier herunterladen.

  • Alaryan, L. A. (2017). Exploring the role of board characteristicson enhancing financial performance of Jordanian listed companies. International Journal of Economics and Finance, 9(7), 99-105.

  • Alatassi, B., & Letza, S. (2018). Best practice in bank corporate governance: The case of islamic banks. Economics and Business Review, 4(4), 115-133.

  • Ararat, M., Black, B. S., & Yurtoglu, B. (2017). The effect of corporate governance on firm value and profitability: Time-series evidence from Turkey. Emerging Markets Review, 30, 113-132.

  • Aras, G. (2015). The effect of corporate governance practices on financial structure in emerging markets: Evidence from BRICK countries and lessons for Turkey. Emerging Markets Finance and Trade, 51, 5-24.

  • Arellano, M., & Bover, O. (1995) Another look at the ınstrumental variable estimation of error-component models. Journal of Econometrics, 68, 29-52.

  • Basel Committee on Banking Supervision. (2010). Principles for enhancing corporate governance. Basel: Bank for International Settlements.

  • Béjaoui, R., & Bouzgarrou, H. (2014). Determinants of Tunisian bank profitability. The International Journal of Business and Finance Research, 8(4), 121-131.

  • Bektaş, E., & Kaymak, T. (2009). Governance mechanisms and ownership in an emerging market: The case of Turkish banks. Emerging Markets Finance and Trade, 45, 20-32.

  • Bhagat, S., & Black, B. (2002). The non-correlation between board ındependence and long-term firm performance. The Journal of Corporation Law, 27, 231-274.

  • Blundell, R., & Bond, S. (1998). Initial conditions and moment restrictions in dynamic panel data models. Journal of Econometrics, 87(1), 115-143.

  • Bouheni, F. B. (2014). Banking regulation and supervision: Can it enhance stability in Europe?. Journal of Financial Economic Policy, 6(3), 244-269.

  • Boussaada, R., & Labaronne, D. (2015). Ownership concentration, board structure and credit risk: The Case of MENA Banks. Bankers, Markets and Investors ESKA Publishing, 139, 5-18.

  • Cadbury, A. (1992). The financial aspects of corporate governance (Cadbury Report). London: The Committee on the Financial Aspect of Corporate Governance.

  • De Andres, P., & Vallelado, E. (2008). Corporate governance in banking: The role of the board of directors. Journal of Banking and Finance, 32(12), 2570-2580.

  • Fama, E., & Jensen, M. (1983). Separation of ownership and control. Journal of Law and Economics, 26, 301-326.

  • Ferrero, I. F., María, Á. F., & María, J. M. (2016). The effect of environmental, social and governance consistency on economic results. Sustainability, 8(10), 1-16.

  • Fernandes, C., Farinha, J., Martins, F. V., & Mateus, C. (2017). Supervisory boards, financial crisis and bank performance: Do board characteristics matter?. Journal of Banking Regulation, 18, 310-337.

  • Firstenberg, P. B., & Malkiel, B. G. (1994, fall). The twenty-first century boardroom: Who will be in charge?. Sloan Management Review, 36, 1.

  • Gafoor, C. A., Mariappan, V., & Thyagarajan, S. (2018). Board characteristics and bank performance in India. IIMB Management Review, 30(2), 160-167.

  • Ghosh, S., & Ansari, J. (2018). Board characteristics and financial performance: Evidence from Indian cooperative banks. Journal of Co-operative Organization and Management, 6(2), 86-93.

  • Hakimi, A., Rachdi, H., Ben Selma Mokni, R., & Hssini, H. (2018). Do board characteristics affect bank performance? Evidence from the Bahrain islamic banks. Journal of Islamic Accounting and Business Research, 9(2), 251-272.

  • Haşit, G., & Uçar, A. (2014). Sermaye Piyasası Kurulu (SPK) Kurumsal Yönetim İlkelerinden Yönetim Kurulu İlkesinin İncelenmesine Yönelik Nitel Bir Araştırma. Sakarya İktisat Dergisi, 3(2), 85-113.

  • Inci, A. C. (2018). Financials sector ıntraday volatility characteristics in the emerging Turkish economy. Eurasian Economic Review, 8, 215-229.

  • Laeven, L. (2013). Corporate governance: What’s special about banks?. Annual Review of Financial Economics, 5(1), 63-92.

  • Levine, R. (2004). The corporate governance of banks: A concise discussion of concepts and evidence. (Working Paper). Washington: World Bank.

  • Liang, Q., Xu, P., & Jiraporn, P. (2013). Board characteristics and Chinese bank performance. Journal of Banking and Finance, 37, 2953-2968.

  • Macey, J. R., & O’Hara, M. (2003). The corporate governance of banks. Economic Policy Review, 9(1), 91-107.

  • OECD. (2010). OECD Principles of corporate governance. Paris: OECD.

  • Ozsoz, E., Gurarda, S., & Ates A. (2014). Ownership structure and corporate governance in the case of Turkey. Munich Personal RePEc Archive 58293.

  • Rivard, R., & Thomas, C. R. (1997). The effect of interstate banking on large bank holding company profitability. Journal of Economics and Business, 49, 61-76.

  • Saha, R., & Kabra, K. C. (2019). Does corporate governance influence firm performance? Evidence from India. Economics and Business Review, 5(4), 70-89.

  • Sarkar, J., & Sarkar, S. (2018). Bank ownership, board characteristics and performance: Evidence from commercial banks in India. International Journal of Financial Studies, 6(1), 1-30.

  • Setiawan, C., Hasan, T., Hassan, M. K., & Mohamad, S. (2017). Non-performing loans and bank efficiency of conventional and islamic banks in the organization of islamic cooperation (OIC) countries. Journal of Islamic Economics, Banking and Finance, 113(6223), 1-26.

  • Titova, Y. (2016). Are board characteristics relevant for banking efficiency? Evidence from the US. Corporate Governance, 16(4), 655-679.

OPEN ACCESS

Zeitschrift + Hefte

Suche