Constitutional conflicts in the European Union: Court packing in Poland versus the United States


Court packing greatly threatens democracy. This paper examines, compares and draws conclusions from two attempts: The PiS government is near to packing Polish courts; President Roosevelt tried but failed to pack the U.S. Supreme Court in 1937. In most democracies a head of government with a legislative majority and strong party control can pack courts, giving complete control. The United States escaped; Roosevelt lacked complete party control. Poland is unlucky; PiS is strongly controlled. Peaceful domestic protest is necessary, but Poland’s hope is from EU-level institutional pressure, supported by major democracies, to reverse packing and prevent further seizure of power.

If the inline PDF is not rendering correctly, you can download the PDF file here.

  • Accession criteria (Copenhagen criteria). EUR-LEX. Retrieved from

  • Bell, D. (2013, June 11). George Wallace stood in a doorway at the University of Alabama 50 years ago today. USA Today. Retrieved from

  • Blackman, J. (2017, November 27). Republicans should not pack the courts. National Review. Retrieved from

  • Calabresi, G., (2017, November 24). It wouldn’t be ‘court-packing’ for Republicans to expand the federal courts. National Review. Retrieved from

  • Calabresi, G. & Hirji, S. (2017, November 27). Judicial appointments after judge Robert H. Bork. Balkinization. Retrieved from

  • Calabresi, G. & Hirji, S. (2018, July 20). Working Paper, taken down from SSRN and not re-posted as of July 20, 2018.

  • Carter, Z. (2018, June 27). Hey, Democrats: Pack the Court. HuffPost. Retrieved from

  • Constitution of the Republic of Poland (1997, April 2). Retrieved from

  • Davies, C. (2018a, May). Hostile Takeover: How law and justice captured Poland’s courts. Nations in Transition Analytical Brief. Freedom House. Retrieved from:

  • Davies, C., (2018b, July 2). Poland’s supreme court constitutional crisis approaches a standoff. Guardian. Retrieved from

  • Dickens, C. (2004). David Copperfield. London: Penguin Classics.

  • E.U. Commission (2018, August 14). Press Release. Brussels.

  • Fehrenbacher, D. (1978). The Dred Scott case. Its significance in American law and politics. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.

  • Gavel to Gavel. Over a dozen efforts to alter number of state supreme court justices, almost all related to “packing” the courts, in last several years. Retrieved from

  • Gavel to Gavel. Plans to add 2 justices to the Arizona and Georgia supreme courts pass committee hurdles; critics call them court packing plans. Retrieved from

  • Goodman, R. (2018, July 04). Hey, Democrats, fighting fair is for suckers. Court-packing! Puerto Rican statehood! Votes for felons! Why-and how-the next Democratic majority should play dirty. Politico. Retrieved from

  • GRECO. (2018,19-23 March). Ad hoc Report on POLAND (Rule 34). Adopted by GRECO at its 79th Plenary Meeting.

  • Harrison, J. (2017). The political question doctrines. American University Law Review, 67, 457-528.

  • Heagney, M. (2013, May 15). Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg offers critique of Roe v. Wade during Law School visit. University of Chicago Law School. Retrieved from

  • Krock, A., (1938, November 9). Win back 10 states; Republicans take Ohio, Wisconsin, Kansas and Massachusetts. New York Times, 1.

  • Kumm, M. & Ferreres Comella, V. (2005). The primacy clause of the constitutional treaty and the future of constitutional conflict in the European Union. International Journal of Constitutional Law, 3, 473-492. doi: 10.1093/icon/moi029

  • Letowska, E. (2018, February 20). Position of the Helsinki Committee in Poland. An open letter. Public Seminar. Retrieved from

  • Leuchtenburg, W.E. (1995). The Supreme Court reborn: The constitutional revolution in the age of Roosevelt. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.

  • Lewis, A. (1957, September 24). President sends troops to Little Rock, federalizes Arkansas National Guard, tells nation he acted to avoid an anarchy. New York Times. Retrieved from

  • Lisbon Treaty. (2017). Consolidated protocols, annexes and declarations attached to the treaties of the European Union/Declarations. Retrieved from,_annexes_and_declarations_attached_to_the_treaties_of_the_European_Union/Declarations#17._Declaration_concerning_primacy

  • Lithwick, D. (2017, November 22). Judges over principles. The never-Trump legal movement has morphed into a push to pack the courts with Trump-selected judges. Slate. Retrieved from

  • Matczak, M. (2018a, March 8). Poland: From paradigm to pariah? Polish constitutional crisis-facts and interpretations. Oxford: Lecture.

  • Matczak, M. (2018b, July 6). Poland’s Constitutional Crisis: Facts and interpretations. Oxford: The Foundation for Law, Justice and Society.

  • Matthews, D. (2018, July 10). Court-packing, Democrats’ nuclear option for the Supreme Court, explained. Vox. Retrieved from

  • Mazur, D. & Żurek, W. (2017). The judiciary in Poland at the threshold of 2017: Challenges and threats. Ruch Prawniczy, Ekonomiczny i Socjologiczny, 79(1), 25-38.

  • McKenna, M.C. (2002). Franklin Roosevelt and the Great Constitutional War: The courtpacking crisis of 1937. New York, NY: Fordham University Press.

  • Millhiser, I. (2015 February 23). In defense of court-packing. Slate. Retrieved from

  • Primus, R. (2017, November 24). Rulebooks, playgrounds, and endgames: A constitutional analysis of the Calabresi-Hirji judgeship proposal, Harvard Law School Blog. Retrieved from

  • Right to an effective remedy and to a fair trial. EU Charter of Fundamental Rights.

  • Saad, L. (2016, February 26), Gallup vault: A Supreme Court power play. Retrieved from

  • Santora, M. (2018). Amid growing uproar, Poland to remove 27 Supreme Court justices. New York Times.

  • Schlesinger, A., Jr. (2003a). The coming of the New Deal, 1933-1935 (The Age of Roosevelt, vol. 2). Boston, MA: Mariner Books.

  • Schlesinger, Arthur, Jr. (2003b). The politics of upheaval: 1935-1936 (The Age of Roosevelt, vol. 3). Boston, MA: Mariner Books.

  • Somin, I. (2017, November 27). The case against court-packing. The Volokh Conspiracy. Retrieved from

  • Somin, I. (2018, July 3). The case against court-packing revisited. The Volokh Conspiracy. Retrieved from

  • Sweeney, R. J. (2018). Constitution making in the Great Federations: The E.U. Constitution in light of U.S. constitutional crises. Mimeo: Claremont Graduate University.

  • Szczerbiak, A. (2017, January 19). Is Poland’s constitutional tribunal crisis over?. University College London, The Constitution Unit. Retrieved from

  • Szczerbiak, A. (2018, January 20). Analysis: Impact of Article 7 on Polish Politics. Delano. Retrieved from

  • The Constitution of the Republic of Poland, chapter VIII, art. 175,178,179,183,187-190,194,195 & 197.

  • Tushnet, M. (2017, November 25). Expanding the judiciary, the Senate rules, and the small-c constitution. Balkinization. Retrieved from

  • U.S. Constitution. Impeachment of federal judges. Retrieved from

  • U.S. Constitution. The Bill of Rights & All Amendments. Note 10. Retrieved from

  • United States Senate Committee on Governmental Affairs & House of Representatives Committee on Government Reform (published after each Presidential election). Plum book.

  • Wheeler, B. K. (1937, March 10). First Member of the Senate to back the President in ‘32. Chicago Forum. Retrieved from

  • White, E. G. (2000). The Constitution and the New Deal. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

  • Yoo, J. & Delahunty, R. (2018, July 19). The foolish court-packing craze. National Review. Retrieved from


Journal + Issues