A bitter diagnostic of the ultra-liberal human: Michel Houellebecq on some ethical issues

Zuzana Malinovská 1  and Ján Živčák 2
  • 1 University of Prešov, Institute of Romance Studies, Prešov, Slovakia
  • 2 University of Prešov, Institute of Romance Studies, Prešov, Slovakia


The paper examines the ethical dimensions of Michel Houellebecq’s works of fiction. On the basis of keen diagnostics of contemporary Western culture, this world-renowned French writer predicts the destructive social consequences of ultra-liberalism and enters into an argument with transhumanist theories. His writings, depicting the misery of contemporary man and imagining a new human species enhanced by technologies, show that neither the so-called neo-humans nor the “last man” of liberal democracies can reach happiness. The latter can only be achieved if humanist values, shared by previous generations and promoted by the great 19th-century authors (Balzac, Flaubert), are reinvented.

If the inline PDF is not rendering correctly, you can download the PDF file here.

  • BARONI, R. & ESTIER, S. (2016): Peut-on lire Houellebecq ? Un cas d’illisibilité contemporaine. In: Fabula-LhT, 16 – Crises de lisibilité. [online] [Retrieved March 12, 2019] Available at: http://www.fabula.org/lht/index.php?id=1634

  • CÉLINE, L.-F. (1952): Voyage au bout de la nuit. Paris: Gallimard.

  • CLÉMENT, M. L. & WESEMAEL, S. van (2007): Michel Houellebecq sous la loupe. Amsterdam & New York: Rodopi.

  • FOUCAULT, M. (1970): The order of things: An archaeology of the human sciences. New York: Pantheon Books.

  • FUKUYAMA, F. (1992): The end of history and the last man. New York: Free Press.

  • HARARI, Y. N. (2016): Homo deus: A brief history of tomorrow. London: Harvill Secker.

  • HOUELLEBECQ, M. (1991): Rester vivant : méthode. Paris: La Différence.

  • HOUELLEBECQ, M. (1994): Extension du domaine de la lutte. Paris: Maurice Nadeau.

  • HOUELLEBECQ, M. (2001): Plateforme. Paris: Flammarion.

  • HOUELLEBECQ, M. (2005): La Possibilité d’une île. Paris: Fayard.

  • HOUELLEBECQ, M. (2015a): Soumission. Paris: Flammarion.

  • LINDENBERG, D. (2002): Le rappel à l’ordre. Enquêtes sur les nouveaux réactionnaires. Paris: Seuil.

  • MANILÈVE, V. (2015): Michel Houellebecq, le mal-aimé des universitaires français. In: Slate.fr. [online] [Retrieved March 12, 2019] Available at: http://www.slate.fr/story/96947/universitaires-michel-houellebecq

  • SLOTERDIJK, P. (2016): Rules for the Human Park. A Reponse to Heidegger’s “Letter on ‘Humanism’”. In: P. Sloterdijk: Not saved: Essays after Heidegger, trans. I. A. Moore & Ch. Turner. Cambridge: Polity Press, pp. 193–216. [online] [Retrieved March 12, 2019] Available at: https://www.academia.edu/31233486/Sloterdijk_Rules_for_the_Human_Park

  • VIARD, B. (2013): Les tiroirs de Michel Houellebecq. Paris: PUF.

  • HOUELLEBECQ, M. (1998): Whatever, trans. P. Hammond. London: Serpent’s Tail.

  • HOUELLEBECQ, M. (2000): The elementary particles, trans. F. Wynne. New York: Alfred A. Knopf.

  • HOUELLEBECQ, M. (2002): Platform, trans. F. Wynne. London: William Heinemann.

  • HOUELLEBECQ, M. (2006): The Possibility of an Island, trans. G. Bowd. New York: Alfred A. Knopf.

  • HOUELLEBECQ, M. (2012): The map and the territory, trans. G. Bowd. New York: Alfred A. Knopf.

  • HOUELLEBECQ, M. (2015b): Submission, trans. L. Stein. New York: Farrar, Straus and Giroux.

  • HOUELLEBECQ, M. (2019): Serotonin, trans. S. Whiteside. New York: Farrar, Straus and Giroux.


Journal + Issues