Different approaches to the relationship of life & death (review of articles)

Martin Gluchman 1
  • 1 College of the Marshall Islands,


The paper presents different approaches to the relationship of life and death among selected authors as a review of their articles within the last volume of the Ethics & Bioethics (in Central Europe) journal. The resource of the review is an article by Peter Singer The challenge of brain death for the sanctity of life ethics. Firstly, I try to analyze the issue when death occurs and when we can talk about death as a phenomenon that each and every living human being must come to terms within the course of their lives. Ethics of social consequences is used to analyze different approaches and states a conclusion defending the principles of humanity and human dignity within the scope of this ethical theory applied to various problem cases. I strive to support the question of the quality of life through the paternalistic approach of physicians influenced by their humane and dignified understanding of their relationship towards the patients. Ethics of social consequences offers many solutions to the discussed issues throughout the reviewed articles.

If the inline PDF is not rendering correctly, you can download the PDF file here.

  • CAMPBELL, A., CHARLESWORTH, M., GILLET, G. & JONES, G. (1997): Medical ethics. Auckland: Oxford University Press.

  • CLARK, W. R. (1996): Sex & the origins of death. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

  • COHEN, C. B. (1983): “Quality of Life” and analogy with the Nazis. In: The Journal of Medicine and Philosophy, 8(5), pp. 113–135.

  • GLUCHMAN, M. (2013): Medical ethics and the problem of assisted suicide. In: Ethics & Bioethics (in Central Europe), 3(1–2), pp. 67–75.

  • GLUCHMAN, M. (2014a): Problém humánnosti a ľudskej dôstojnosti v bioetike [The Problem of Humanity and Human Dignity in Bioethics]. Prešov: Grafotlač.

  • GLUCHMAN, M. (2014b): The Aspects of Physician Relationship to Patient’s Autonomy. In: Ethics & Bioethics (in Central Europe), 4(1–2), pp. 73–82.

  • GLUCHMAN, V. (2005): Miesto humánnosti v etike sociálnych dôsledkov [The place of humanity in the ethics of social consequences]. In: Filozofia, 60(8), pp. 613–623.

  • HERRING, J. (2006): Medical law and ethics (First Edition). Oxford: Oxford University Press.

  • JENNINGS, B. (2004): Alzheimer’s disease and the quality of life. In: K. J. Doka (ed.): Living with Grief: Alzheimer’s disease. Washington, D.C.: The Hospice Foundation of America, pp. 197–212.

  • KALAJTZIDIS, J. (2012): Etika sociálnych dôsledkov a hospodárska etika (so zameraním na finančný sektor [Ethics of social consequences and business ethics (with focus on financial sector)]. Brno: Tribun EU.

  • KALAJTZIDIS, J. (2018): The challenge of death and ethics of social consequences: Death of moral agency. In: Ethics & Bioethics (in Central Europe), 8(3–4), pp. 209–218.

  • KLEMBAROVÁ, J. (2015): Etické a morálne aspekty mentálneho postihnutia [Ethical and moral aspects of mental impairment]. Prešov: FF PU.

  • KOMENSKÁ, K. (2018): Death, ethical judgments and dignity. In: Ethics & Bioethics (in Central Europe), 8(3–4), pp. 201–208.

  • LEŠKOVÁ BLAHOVÁ, A. (2010): Bioetika v kontextoch etiky sociálnych dôsledkov (aplikácia zvolenej paradigmy na vybrané bioetické problémy) [Bioethics in the context of ethics of social consequences (Applications of chosen paradigm on selected bioethical issues)]. Prešov: FF PU.

  • LAURIE, G. (1997): Biotechnology: Facing the problems of Patent Law. In: H. MacQueen & B. Bain (eds.): Innovation, incentive and reward. Edinburg: Edinburg University Press, pp. 115–131.

  • LIZZA, J. P. (2006): Persons, humanity, and the definition of death. Baltimore: The John Hopkins University Press.

  • MASON, J. K. (2012): What is in a Name? The Vagaries of Vo v France. In: Child and Family Law Quarterly, 17(1), pp. 97–112.

  • MCCALL SMITH, A. (1997): Beyond Autonomy. In: Journal of Contemporary Health Law and Policy, 14(23), pp. 5–26.

  • MCMAHAN, J. (2002): The ethics of killing: Problems at the margins of life. Oxford & New York: Oxford University Press.

  • NAGEL, T. (1970): Death. In: Noûs, 4(1), pp. 73–80.

  • NAIR-COLLINS, M. (2017): Can the brain-dead be harmed or wronged? On the moral status of brain death and its implications for organ transplantation. In: Kennedy Institute of Ethics Journal, 27(4), pp. 525–559.

  • NAIR-COLLINS, M. (2018): A biological theory of death: Characterization, justification, and implications. In: Diametros, 55, pp. 27–43.

  • NOWAK, P. G. (2018): Brain death as irreversible loss of a human’s moral status. In: Ethics & Bioethics (in Central Europe), 8(3–4), pp. 167–178.

  • RANDALL, F. & DOWNIE, R. S. (2006): The philosophy of palliative care. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

  • SINGER, P. (1993): Practical Ethics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

  • SINGER, P. (2018): The challenge of brain death for the sanctity of life ethic. In: Ethics & Bioethics (in Central Europe), 8(3–4), pp. 153–165.

  • SHEWMON, D. A. (1998): Chronic ‘Brain Death’: Meta-Analysis and Conceptual Consequences. In: Neurology, 51(6), pp. 1538–1545.

  • SMALL, N., FROGGATT, K. & DOWNS, M. (2007): Living and dying with dementia: Dialogues about palliative care. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

  • ŠVAŇA, L. (2016): „Etika“ vojny a terorizmu [“Ethicsof war and terrorism]. Bratislava: Veda.

  • VEATCH, R. M. (2015): Killing by organ procurement: Brain-based death and legal fictions. In: Journal of Medicine and Philosophy, 40(3), pp. 289–311.

  • WOJEWODA, M. (2018): Axiology and the morality of the human being. In: Ethics & Bioethics (in Central Europe), 8(3–4), pp. 219–226.

  • ZIEMIŃSKI, I. (2018): The ethical problems of death pronouncement and organ donation: A commentary on Peter Singer’s article. In: Ethics & Bioethics (in Central Europe), 8(3–4), pp. 189–200.


Journal + Issues