The challenge of death and ethics of social consequences: Death of moral agency

Open access


The present paper focuses on the issue of death from the perspective of ethics of social consequences. To begin with, the paper summarizes Peter Singer’s position on the issue of brain death and on organ procurement related to the definition of death. For better understanding of the issue, an example from real life is used. There are at least three prominent sets of views on what it takes to be called dead. All those views are shortly presented and analysed. Later, the theory of ethics of social consequences is briefly presented. The paper looks for the position of this ethical theory in connection to the issue of death. The issue of organ procurement, which is closely connected to the problem of defining death, is used as a means for a better understanding of the issue. The issue of death is studied through the categories of moral subject and moral object. Using the standpoint of ethics of social consequences enables us to distinguish between the death of a moral agent and the death of the organism. That helps to soften many issues associated with the topic.

If the inline PDF is not rendering correctly, you can download the PDF file here.

  • BURLEIGH M. (1994): Death and deliverance: Euthanasia in Germany 1900–1945. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

  • COLLINS-NAIR M. GREEN R. S. & SUTIN A. R. (2015): Abandoning the dead donor rule? A national survey of public views on death and organ donations. In: Journal of Medical Ethics 41(4) pp. 297–302.

  • GLUCHMAN M. & KALAJTZIDIS J. (2014): Ethics of social consequences and issue of the principle of humanity in medical ethics. In: 2nd Eurasian multidisciplinary forum. Tbilisi: ESI pp. 235–243.

  • GLUCHMAN V. (1994): Angažovanosť solidarita zodpovednosť [Involvement solidarity responsibility]. Prešov: Universum.

  • GLUCHMAN V. (1997): Človek a morálka [Person and morality]. Brno: Doplněk.

  • GLUCHMAN V. (1999): Etika sociálnych dôsledkov v kontexte jej kritiky [Ethics of social consequences in the context of its critique]. Prešov: L.I.M.

  • GLUCHMAN V. (2008): Etika a reflexie morálky [Ethics and a reflection of morality]. Prešov: FF PU.

  • GLUCHMAN V. (2009): Dignity and human dignity as a methodological basis of bioethics. In: V. Gluchman (ed.): Bioethics in Central Europe: Methodology and education. Prešov: FF PU pp. 73–86.

  • GLUCHMAN V. (2017): G. E. Moore and the theory of moral/right action in ethics of social consequences. In: Ethics & Bioethics (in Central Europe) 7(1–2) pp. 57–65.

  • GLUCHMAN V. (2018): Introduction: Ethics of social consequences – the past and the present. In: V. Gluchman (ed.): Ethics of Social Consequences: Philosophical Applied and Professional Challenges. Newcastle upon Tyne: Cambridge Scholars Publishing pp. viii–xxvii.

  • HAKSAR V. (1998): Moral Agents. In: E. Craig (ed.): Routledge Encyclopedia of Philosophy vol. 6. London: Routledge pp. 499–504.

  • KALAJTZIDIS J. (2013): Ethics of social consequences as a contemporary consequentialist theory. In: Ethics & Bioethics (in Central Europe) 3(3–4) pp. 159–171.

  • KALAJTZIDIS J. (2017): Mravný subjekt v etike sociálnych dôsledkov a jeho komparácia v kontexte konzekvencializmu [Moral agent in the ethics of social consequences and its comparison in the context of consequentialism]. In: V. Gluchman (ed.): Etické myslenie minulosti a súčasnosti (ETPP 2017/18): Človek v súčasnej etike [Ethical thinking – past and present (ETPP 2017/18): Person in contemporary ethics]. Prešov: FF PU pp. 37–49.

  • KALAJTZIDIS J. (2018): Responsibility and Justice: Secondary Values in Ethics of Social Consequences. In: V. Gluchman (ed.): Ethics of social consequences: Philosophical applied and professional challenges. Newcastle upon Tyne: Cambridge Scholars Publishing pp. 2–23.

  • KOMENSKÁ K. (2014): Etika vzťahu k zvieratám (cez optiku etiky sociálnych dôsledkov) [Ethics of relation to animals (in the optics of the ethics of social consequences)]. Prešov: VPU.

  • LUPER S. (2009): The Philosophy of death. New York: Cambridge University Press.

  • MCMAHAN J. (2002): The ethics of killing: Problems at the margins of life. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

  • MYSONA BYRSKA J. (2015): Values in consumption society: A comparison of consumption society in Poland and in Slovakia. In: European Scientific Journal 11(special edition of July) pp. 110–117.

  • POLOMSKÁ J. (2018): Human dignity within ethics of social consequences. In: V. Gluchman (ed.): Ethics of social consequences: Philosophical applied and professional challenges. Newcastle upon Tyne: Cambridge Scholars Publishing pp. 137–183.

  • SHEWMON D. A. & MACHADO C. (eds.) (2004): Brain death and disorders of consciousness. New York: Springer.

  • SINGER P. (2018): The challenge of brain death for the sanctity of life ethic. In: Ethics & Bioethics (in Central Europe) 8(3–4) pp. 153–165.

  • ŠVAŇA L. (2016): On two modern hybrid forms of consequentialism. In: Ethics & Bioethics (in Central Europe) 6(3–4) pp. 157–166.

  • VEATCH M. R. & ROSS L. F. (2016): Defining death: The case for choice. Washington: Georgetown University Press.

  • VEATCH M. R. (2010): Transplanting Hearts after Death Measured by Cardiac Criteria: The Challenge to the Dead Donor Rule. In: Journal of Medicine and Philosophy 35(3) pp. 313–329.

Impact Factor

CiteScore 2018: 0.35

SCImago Journal Rank (SJR) 2018: 0.161

Gesamte Zeit Letztes Jahr Letzte 30 Tage
Abstract Views 0 0 0
Full Text Views 483 304 10
PDF Downloads 327 207 20