In his paper “The challenge of brain death for the sanctity of life ethic”, Peter Singer advocates two options for dealing with death criteria in a way that is compatible with efficient organ transplantation policy. He suggests that we should either (a) redefine death as cortical death or (b) go back to the old cardiopulmonary criterion and scrap the Dead Donor Rule. We welcome Singer’s line of argument but raise some concerns about the practicability of the two alternatives advocated by him. We propose adding a third alternative that also – as the two previous alternatives – preserves and extends the possibility of organ transplantation without using anyone without their consent. Namely, we would like to draw readers’ attention to a proposal by Robert Veatch, formulated 42 years ago in his 1976 book “Death, dying, and the biological revolution” and developed further in his later publications. Veatch argues for a conscience clause for the definition of death that would permit people to pick from a reasonable range of definitional options. This autonomy-based option, we believe, is more likely to be practicable than the two options advocated by Singer. Furthermore, we present data from a study with Lithuanian participants that suggest that there is quite pronounced variation of preferences concerning death determination.
BAGHERI, A. (2007): Individual choice in the definition of death. In: Journal of Medical Ethics, 33(3), pp. 146–149.
DEGRAZIA, D. (2005): Human identity and bioethics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
DUBOIS, J. M. & ANDERSON, E. E. (2006): Attitudes towards death criteria and organ donation among healthcare personnel and the general public. In: Progress in Transplantation, 16(1), pp. 65–73.
EMANUEL, L. L. (1995): Reexamining death: The asymptotic model and a bounded zone definition. In: Hastings Center Report, 25(4), pp. 27–35.
ENGELHARDT Jr., H. T. (1999): Redefining death: The mirage of consensus. In: S. J. Younger, R. M. Arnold & R. Schapiro (eds.): The definition of death: Contemporary controversies. Baltimore: The John Hopkins University Press, pp. 319–331.
GLANNON, W. (2007): Bioethics and the brain. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
GRISSOM, R. J. & KIM, J. J. (2014): Effect sizes for research: Univariate and multivariate applications. New York: Routledge.
KATO, Y. (2013): Conscience in health care and the definitions of death. In: Croatian Medical Journal, 54(1), pp. 75–77.
MCMAHAN, J. (2012): Death, brain death, and persistent vegetative state. In: H. Kuhse & P. Singer (eds.): A companion to bioethics, 2nd ed. Malden, MA: Wiley-Blackwell, pp. 286–298.
MILES, S. (1999): Death in a technological and pluralistic culture. In: S. J. Younger, R. M. Arnold & R. Schapiro (eds.): The definition of death: Contemporary controversies. Baltimore: The John Hopkins University Press, pp. 311–318.
NAIR-COLLINS, M., GREEN, S. R. & SUTIN, A. R. (2014): Abandoning the dead donor rule? A national survey of public view on death and organ donation. In: Journal of Medical Ethics, 41(4), pp. 297–302.
NEIDERS, I. & DRANSEIKA, V. (unpublished manuscript): Pluralistic policy of determination of death: A report on public views.
SASS, H. (1992): Criteria for death: Self-determination and public policy. In: The Journal of Medicine and Philosophy, 17(4), pp. 445–454.
SHAH, S. K., KASPER, K. & MILLER, F. G. (2015): A narrative review of the empirical evidence on public attitudes on brain death and vital organ transplantation: the need for better data to inform policy. In: Journal of Medical Ethics, 41(4), pp. 291–296.
SINGER, P. (1995): Rethinking life and death: The collapse of our traditional ethics. New York: St. Martin’s Press.
SINGER, P. (2018): The challenge of brain death for the sanctity of life ethic. In: Ethics & Bioethics (in Central Europe), 8(3–4), pp. 153–165.
VEATCH, R. M. (1976): Death, dying, and the biological revolution. New Haven: Yale University Press.
VEATCH, R. M. (1993): The impending collapse of the whole-brain definition of death. In: Hastings Center Report, 23(4), pp. 18–24.
VEATCH, R. M. (1999): The conscience clause. How much individual choice in defining death can our society tolerate? In: S. J. Younger, R. M. Arnold & R. Schapiro (eds.): The definition of death: Contemporary controversies. Baltimore: The John Hopkins University Press, pp. 137–160.
VEATCH, R. M. & ROSS, L. F. (2016): Defining death: The case for choice. Washington, DC: Georgetown University Press.
YANG, Q. & MILLER, G. (2015): East–West differences in perception of brain death. In: Journal of Bioethical Inquiry, 12(2), pp. 211–225.