The ethical context of social philosophy in contemporary India

Open access

Abstract

Public and academic philosophical thinking in contemporary India provides evidence that philosophy and religion have never been truly separated, although there have been attempts to bring philosophy closer to science and, thus, create two autonomous systems. In light of these changes, P. V. Athavale, C. T. K. Chari, N. S. Prasad and some other authors have formed and are developing modern ethical and social theories. Moreover, feminism and gender studies have appeared in the panorama of changing philosophical and sociological thinking in India, embracing gender equality in contemporary Indian society. There has been increasing interest in sociological research and a critical interpretation of Mahatma Gandhi’s spiritual message in the cause of India’s independence, whose thoughts authors engaged in contemporary ethical problems believe to be impractical and useless today. Existentialism as a philosophical stream earned broad public acceptance and played a significant role in the history of modern philosophical thinking in India in the second half of the 20th century.

If the inline PDF is not rendering correctly, you can download the PDF file here.

  • ATKINS L. (2006): Feministická sociální teorie [Feministic social theory]. In: A. Harrington (ed.): Moderní sociální teorie. Základní témata a myšlenkové proudy [Modern social theories: Basic topics and ideological trends]. Prague: Portál pp. 313-335.

  • BETEILLE A. (2002): Sociology: Essays on Approach and Method. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

  • BHATTACHARYA J. N. (1896): Hindu Castes and Sects: An Exposition of the Origin of the Hindu Caste System and the Bearing of the Sects toward Each Other and toward Other Religious Systems. Calcutta: Thacker & Spink.

  • CHARI C. T. K. (1973): Critical review of Stevenson’s Twenty Cases. New Delhi: Sterling.

  • CHAUDHURY H. (1962): Existentialism and Vedanta. In: Philosophy East and West 12(1) pp. 89-99.

  • DAS C. (1978): Gandhi and Gopabandhu. Bhubaneswar: Pathika Prakashan.

  • DAS R. (2004): Gandhi and Mao in Quest of Analogy. New Delhi: Sarup and Sons.

  • DATTA D. M. (1953): The Philosophy of Mahatma Gandhi. Wisconsin: University of Wisconsin Press.

  • GHURYE G. S. (1962): Cities and Civilization. New Delhi: Popular Prakashan.

  • GHURYE G. S. (1963): Anatomy of Rur-urban Comunity. New Delhi: Popular Prakashan.

  • GHURYE G. S. (2008): Caste and Race in India. New Delhi: Popular Prakashan.

  • GOEL S. K. (2002): Gandhian Perspectives on Industrial Relations. Delhi: Shipra Publications.

  • HAJKO D. (2004): Sarvepalli Rádhakrišnan a „náboženstvo ducha“ [Sarvepalli Rádhakrišnan and the religion of spirit] In: Filozofia 59(1) pp. 8-19.

  • JOLLY S. K.(2007): Gandhi A Study. New Delhi: Concept Publishing Company.

  • KNOTKOVÁ-ČAPKOVÁ B. MARKOVÁ D. & POSPÍŠILOVÁ D. (2012): Hinduismus [Hinduism]. In: B. Knotková-Čapková (ed.): Obraz ženy v náboženských kultúrach [Image of woman in religious cultures]. Prague: Paseka pp. 142-199.

  • KOSAMBI M. (1994): Urbanization and Urban Development in India. New Delhi: Indian Council of Social Science Research.

  • KRISHNA D. (1955): The Nature of Philosophy. Calcutta: Praki Prakashan.

  • KUMARASAMY A. (2006): Gandhi on Personal Leadership. Mumbai: Jaico.

  • MARKOVÁ D. (1986): Obraz města v současné hindské próze [Image of city in contemporarz hindu prose]. In: Nový Orient 4 p. 103.

  • MOHANAN B. ed. (1999): Gandhi’s Legacy and New Human Civilisation. New Delhi: Gyan.

  • MOHANTY C. T. RUSSO A. & TORRES L. eds. (1991): Third World Women and the Politics of Feminism. Bloomington & Indianapolis: Indiana University Press.

  • MUKERJI A. C. (1963): Existentialism and Indian Philosophy. In: The Philosophical Quarterly 35(4) pp. 260-261.

  • NEHRU J.: Jawaharlal Nehru’s Speeches 1948-1953. New Delhi: Government of India.

  • PANDEY U. (2007): Post-modernism and Gandhi. Jaipur: Rawat Publications.

  • PATEL S. (2003): Urban Studies: Readers in Sociology and Social Anthropology. Delhi: Oxford University Press..

  • PATEL S. (2006): Bombay and Mumbai: The City in Transition. Delhi: Oxford University Press.

  • RADHAKRISHNAN P. (2007): Religion Caste and State. Jaipur: Rawa Publications.

  • RAJADHYAKSHA R. (2015): Social Structure & Stratification. New Delhi: Dominant Books.

  • RAJU P. T. (1962): Introduction to Comparative Philosophy. Lincoln: University of Nebraska Press.

  • REGE S. (2006): Writing Caste Writing Gender: Reading Dalit women’s Testimonios. New Delhi: Zubaan.

  • SHAH G. (1986): Gandhi for the New Generation. Ahmedabad: Navajivan.

  • SHARMA S. P. (1992): Gandhian Holistic Economics. New Delhi: Concept.

  • SINARI R. A. (1970): Structure of Indian Thought. Springfield: Charles C. Thomas.

  • SINARI R. A. (2007): Paradox of Being Human. New Delhi: Indian Council of Philosophical Research.

  • SINGH H. (2006): Gandhian Though and Philosophy. Jodhpur: Rajasthani Granthagar.

  • SINGH R. (1986): Gandhi Darshan Mimamsa (A Handbook of Gandhian Philosophy). Patna: Bihar Hindi Granth Academy.

  • SINGH Y. (1997): Social Stratification and Change in India. New Delhi: Manohar.

  • SINGH Y. (2000): Culture Change in India: Identity and Globalization. New Delhi: Rawat.

  • TANDON V. (2007): Studies in Gandhian Thought and Marxism. New Delhi: Radha.

  • ZELINOVÁ Š. (2009): Amartya Kumar Sen - ekonom rozvoje a blahobytu filozof svobody i bídy a hladu [Amartya Kumar Sen - economist of development and welfare philosopher of freedom poverty and famine]. In: Ekonomický časopis 57(6) pp. 587-599.

Search
Journal information
Impact Factor


CiteScore 2018: 0.35

SCImago Journal Rank (SJR) 2018: 0.161

Metrics
All Time Past Year Past 30 Days
Abstract Views 0 0 0
Full Text Views 548 394 5
PDF Downloads 298 201 6