Towards critical aspects of Confucianism

Ľubomír Dunaj


This paper consists of two parts. The first deals with the issue of whether it is possible to coherently employ the term ‘critical Confucian’ in general, i.e. whether it is a paradox or oxymoron. It will be argued that Confucianism should not be identified with any particular ideology and, therefore, can be critical. This critical potential, in turn, can be developed by bringing it into dialogue with Critical Theory. As such, the second part indicates, in an introductory way, some possible overlaps between Confucianism and Critical Theory by comparing Heiner Roetz’s and Axel Honneth’s respective interpretations of these traditions.

Falls das inline PDF nicht korrekt dargestellt ist, können Sie das PDF hier herunterladen.

  • ANGLE, S. A. (2012a): Contemporary Confucian Political Philosophy: Toward Progressive Confucianism. Cambridge (UK) & Malden (USA): Polity.

  • ANGLE, S. A. (2012b): Contemporary Confucian Perspectives on Social Justice. In: M. Palmer (ed.): Companion to Religion and Social Justice. New York, Blackwell, pp. 93–109.

  • APP, U. (2010): The Birth of Orientalism. Philadelphia & Oxford: University of Pennsylvania Press.

  • ARNASON, J. P., EISENSTADT, S. N. & WITTROCK, B. (eds.) (2005): Axial Civilizations and World History. Leiden: Brill.

  • BEHR, W. (2015): Der gegenwärtige Forschungstand zur Etymologie von rén 仁 im Überblick. In: Bochumer Jahrbuch zur Ostasienforschung, 38, pp. 199–224.

  • BELLAH, R. N. & JOAS, H. (2012): The Axial Age and Its Consequences. Cambridge, MA & London: The Belknap Press.

  • ČARNOGURSKÁ, M. (2009): Lao c’ a proces vzniku Tao Te ťingu, 1. diel [Laozi and the Process of the Genesis of Dao De jing, vol. 1]. Bratislava: Veda.

  • ČARNOGURSKÁ, M. (2012): Lao c’ a proces vzniku Tao Te ťingu, 2. diel [Laozi and the Process of the Genesis of Dao De jing, vol. 2]. Bratislava: Veda.

  • ČARNOGURSKÁ-FERANCOVÁ, M. (2015): Modern World Needs Laozi’s Wisdom about the Substance of Being and Living in Harmony with Nature. In: Sociology and Anthropology, 3(4), pp. 207–217.

  • ČARNOGURSKÁ-FERANCOVÁ, M. (2016): Modern Natural Sciences Could Inspire from Classical Chinese Metaphysics to Better Understand the Nature of Being. In: Universal Journal of Physics and Application, 10(5), pp. 157–169.

  • CCHAO SÜEČCHIN (2001–2006): Sen o Červenom pavilóne I.–IV. [A Dream of Red Mansions], trans. M. Čarnogurská. Bratislava: Petrus.

  • CHAN-FEJ-C´ (2011): Vol. 1, trans. L. Zádrapa. Praha: Academia.

  • CHAN-FEJ-C´ (2013): Vol. 2, trans. L. Zádrapa. Praha: Academia.

  • CHAN, J. (1999): A Confucian Perspective on Human Rights for Contemporary China. In: J. Bauer & D. A. Bell (eds.): The East Asian Challenge for Human Rights. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 212–237.

  • DERANTY, J.-P. (2009): Beyond Communication: A Critical Study of Axel Honneth’s Social Philosophy. Leiden & Boston: Brill.

  • FORST, R. (2014): The Right to Justification: Elements of a Constructivist Theory of Justice. New York: Columbia University Press.

  • GARFIELD, J. L. & VAN NORDEN, B. W. (2016): If Philosophy Won’t Diversify, Let’s Call It What It Really Is. In: The New York Times. [Online] [Retrieved September 30, 2016] Available at:

  • HEUBEL, F. (2009): Transkulturelle Kritik und die chinesische Moderne. Zwischen Frankfurter Schule und Neokonfuzianismus. In: I. Amelung & A. Dippner (eds.): Kritische Verhältnisse. Die Rezeption der Frankfurter Schule in China. Frankfurt/New York: Campus Verlag, pp. 43–65.

  • HONNETH, A. (1996): Sociální filosofie a postmoderní etika. Praha: Filosofia.

  • HONNETH, A. (2007): Disrespect: The Normative Foundations of Critical Theory. Cambridge (UK) & Malden (USA): Polity Press.

  • HONNETH, A. (2009): Pathologies of Reason: On the Legacy of Critical Theory. New York: Columbia University Press.

  • HONNETH, A. (2011): Patologie rozumu. Dějiny a současnost kritické teorie. Praha: Filosofia.

  • HONNETH, A. (2014): Freedom’s Right: The Social Foundation of Democratic Life. Cambridge: Polity Press.

  • HONNETH, A. (2015): Die Idee des Sozialismus: Versuch einer Aktualisierung. Berlin: Suhrkamp.

  • HRUBEC, M. (2010): Preconditions of an Intercultural Dialogue on Human Rights. In: Veritas, 55(1), pp. 183–205.

  • HSU CHO-YUN (2005): Rethinking the Axial Age–The Case of Chinese Culture. In: J. P. Arnason, S. N. Eisenstadt & B. Wittrock (eds.): Axial Civilizations and World History. Leiden: Brill, pp. 451–467.

  • KONFUCIUS (2002): Rozhovory a výroky (Lun Jü) [Analects of Confucius]. Bratislava: Slovenský Tatran.

  • KWONG-LOI SHUN & WONG, D. B. (eds.) (2004): Confucian Ethics: A Comparative Study of Self, Autonomy, and Community. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

  • KÖGLER, H.-H. (2005): Constructing a Cosmopolitan Public Sphere: Hermeneutic Capabilities and Universal Values. In: European Journal of Social Theory, 8(3), pp. 297–320.

  • LAI, K. (2008): An Introduction to Chinese Philosophy. New York: Cambridge University Press.

  • METZGER, T. A. (2005): A Cloud across the Pacific: Essays on the Clash between Chinese and Western Political Theories Today. Hong Kong: The Chinese University Press.

  • New Testament. Today’s New International Version. Grand Rapids: Zondervan.

  • ROETZ, H. (1992): Die chinesische Ethik der Achsenzeit. Eine Rekonstruktion unter dem Aspekt des Durchbruchs zu postkonventionellem Denken. Frankfurt am Main: Suhrkamp.

  • ROETZ, H. (2006): Konfuzius. München: C.H. Beck.

  • ROETZ, H. (2008a): Confucianism and Familism: A Comment on the Debate between Liu and Guo. In: Dao: A Journal of Comparative Philosophy, 7(1), pp. 41–44.

  • ROETZ, H. (2008b): Confucianism between Tradition and Modernity, Religion, and Secularization: Questions to Tu Weiming. In: Dao: A Journal of Comparative Philosophy, 7(4), pp. 367–380.

  • ROETZ, H. (2011): Die Chinawissenschaften und die chinesischen Dissidenten. Wer betreibt die „Komplizenschaft mit der Macht“? In: Bochumer Jahrbuch zur Ostasienforschung, 35, pp. 47–79.

  • ROETZ, H. (2012): The Axial Age Theory: A Challenge to Historism or an Explanatory Device of Civilization Analysis? With a Look at the Normative Discourse in Axial Age China. In: R. N. Bellah & H. Joas (eds): The Axial Age and Its Consequences. Cambridge, MA & London: The Belknap Press, pp. 248–273.

  • ROETZ, H. (2013a): The Influence of Foreign Knowledge on Eighteenth Century European Secularism. In: M. Eggert & L. Hölscher (eds.): Religion and Secularity: Transformations and Transfers of Religious Discourses in Europe and Asia. Leiden & Boston: Brill, pp. 9–33.

  • ROETZ, H. (2013b): A comment on Pragmatism in Chinese Studies. In: Confucianism in Inter-cultural Perspectives: Modern Developments. Paper from the Fourth International Conference on Sinology. Taipei: Academica Sinica, pp. 279–299.

  • SŤAHEL, R. (2016): Environmental Limits of Personal Freedom. In: Philosophica Critica 2(1), pp. 3–21.

  • VOCHALA, J. (2009): Konfucius v zrcadle sebraných výroků [Confucius in the Mirror of the Collected Sayings]. Praha: Academia.

  • WILLIAMS, M. S. & WARREN, M. E. (2014): A Democratic Case for Comparative Political Theory. In: Political Theory, 42(1), pp. 26–57.

  • XI JINPING (2014): The Governance of China. Beijing: Foreign Languages Press.

  • YU, K. P., TAO, J. & IVANHOE, P. J. (eds.) (2010): Taking Confucian Ethics Seriously. Albany: State University of New York Press.

  • ZÁDRAPA, L.: Předmluva [Introduction]. In: Chan-Fej-c´, vol. 1, trans. L. Zádrapa. Praha: Academia, pp. 9–20.

  • ZEMPLINER, A. (1966): Čínská filosofie v novověké evropské filosofii [Chinese Philosophy in Modern European Philosophy]. Praha: Academia.

  • ZHANG, D. (2005): Key Concepts in Chinese Philosophy. Beijing, New Haven & London: Foreign Languages Press and Yale University Press.

  • ZHANG, Q. (2010): Humanity or Benevolence? The Interpretation of Confucian Ren and its Modern Implications. In: K. P. Yu, J. Tao & P. J. Ivanhoe (eds.): Taking Confucian Ethics Seriously. Albany: State University of New York Press, pp. 53–72.


Zeitschrift + Hefte