Green Public Procurement: Case Study of Latvian Municipalities

Open access


Green public procurement (GPP) is an instrument for public institutions that have made sustainable consumption and financial aids savings, particularly taking into consideration expenses of the total life cycle of the agreement, not just the procurement price. Municipalities are important to promotion of sustainable consumption through their positive effects on citizens and other stakeholders. The present paper analyses the contribution of municipalities of the Republic of Latvia in developing sustainable consumption through GPP.

The aim of the paper is to explore the development of GPP in municipalities, analysing influencing factors. By analysing data from the Procurement Supervision Agency and the State Regional Development Agency, the proportion of GPP is explored. The paper includes data collected in a survey of municipalities of Latvia aiming to identify the main factors that promote the development of GPP and the ones that are obstacles for implementing the GPP. The conclusions show that GPP is a relatively new activity in Latvia, especially in relation to sustainable consumption. Analytical, graphic, statistical research methods as well as other qualitative and quantitative research methods have been used in the research.

If the inline PDF is not rendering correctly, you can download the PDF file here.

  • Anantharaman M. (2018). Critical sustainable consumption: a research agenda. Journal of Environmental Studies and Sciences8(4) 553–561.

  • Belgica P. B. & Jose B. C. M. (2016). Green public procurement as an initiative for sustainable consumption. An exploratory study of Spanish public universities. Journal of Cleaner Production 133 648–656.

  • Barbier E. (2012). Towards green growth: monitoring progress. Paris: OECD.

  • Brander L. Osthoorn X. Oosterhuis F. Führ V. (2003). Triggering innovation. In: Erdmenger C. (Ed.) Buying into Environment: Experiences Opportunities and Potential for Eco-procurement. Greenleaf Sheffield 94–113.

  • Cabinet of Ministers of the Republic of Latvia. (2002). Strategy for Sustainable Development of Latvia.

  • Cabinet of Ministers of the Republic of Latvia. (2014). Partnership Contract for the 2014-2020 EU Funds Programming Period. Cabinet Order Number 313 accepted: 19.06.2014. Latvijas Vēstnesis 123(5183) 27.06.2014.

  • Cabinet of Ministers of the Republic of Latvia. (2015). Green procurement support plan 2015-2017 Latvijas Vēstnesis 35(5353).

  • Cabinet of Ministers of the Republic of Latvia. (2017). Cabinet of Ministers Regulations No 353 Requirements and Application of the Green Public Procurement Latvijas Vēstnesis 129(5956).

  • Central Finance and Contracting Agency of the Republic of Latvia. (2017). Information on the use of Green Public Procurement in European Structural and Investment Funds projects. Retrieved on 2 February 2018 from

  • Carter C. & Rogers D. (2008). A framework of sustainable supply chain management: Moving toward new theory. International Journal of Physical Distribution and Logistics Management38(5) 360–387.

  • Cheng W. Apolloni A. D’Amato A. Zhu Q. (2018). Green Public Procurement missing concepts and future trends – A critical review Journal of Cleaner Production 176 770–784.

  • Clement S. Plas G. & Erdmenger C. (2003). Local experiences: green purchasing practices in six European cities. In: Erdmenger C. (Ed.) Buying into the Environment: Experiences Opportunities and Potential for Eco-procurement. Greenleaf Sheffield 69–93.

  • Day C. (2005). Buying green: the crucial role of public authorities. Local Environment 10(2) 201–209.

  • D’Amato A. (2007). Environmental issues in public procurement: how much decentralization. In: Piga G. Thai K.V. (Eds.). The Economics of Public Procurement. Palgrave Basingstoke 207–232.

  • European Commission (EC). (2019). What is GPP. Retrieved on 15 September 2019 from

  • European Commission (EC). (2016). Public Procurement Indicators 2015. Retrieved on 15 April 2019 from

  • European Union (EU). (2012). Consolidated versions of the treaty on European Union and the treaty on the functioning of the European Union. Official Journal of the European Union C 326/1.

  • European Environment Agency (EEA). (2015). The European environment — State and outlook 2015: Synthesis report State of the environment report European Environment Agency.

  • Evans L. Nuttall C. Mouat A. Ewing D. (2010). Assessment and comparison of national green and sustainable public procurement criteria and underlying schemes. Final Rep.

  • Gilg A. Barr S. & Ford N. (2005). Green consumption or sustainable lifestyles? Identifying the sustainable consumer. Futures 37(6) 481–504.

  • Giulio A. D. Fischer D. Schäfer M. Blättel-Mink B. (2014). Conceptualizing sustainable consumption: toward an integrative framework. Sustainability Science Practice and Policy 10(1) 45–61.

  • Igarashi M. de Boer L. & Michelsen O. (2015). Investigating the anatomy of supplier selection in Green Public Procurement. Journal of Cleaner Production 108(part A) 442–450.

  • Lorek S. & Spangenberg J. H. (2014). Sustainable consumption within a sustainable economy – beyond green growth and green economies. Journal of Cleaner Production 63 33–44.

  • Lundberg S. Marklund P. O. Strömbäck E. Sundstrom D. (2015). Using public procurement to implement environmental policy: an empirical analysis. Environmental Economics and Policy Studies17(4) 487–520.

  • Nissinen A. Parrikka-Alhola K. & Rita H. (2009). Environmental criteria in the public purchases above the EU threshold values by three Nordic countries: 2003 and 2005. Ecological Economics 68(6) 1838–1849.

  • McCrudden C. (2004). Using public procurement to achieve social outcomes. Natural resources forum 28(4) 257–267.

  • Mellissen F. & Reinders H. (2012). A reflection on the Dutch sustainable public procurement programme. Journal of Integrative Environmental Sciences 9(1) 27–36.

  • Michelsen O. & de Boer L. (2009). Green procurement in Norway; a survey of practices at the municipal and county level. Journal of Environmental Management 91(1) 160–167.

  • Ministry of Environmental Protection and Regional Development (MoEPRD). (2017). Informative Report “On the Green Procurement Support Plan 2015–2017” p.14.

  • Ministry of Finance of the Republic of Latvia. (2015). EU funds 2014-2020. Retrieved on 14 July 2019 from http:/

  • OECD. (2015). Size of public procurement in Government at a Glance 2015 Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development p. 214.

  • Oosterhuis F. Rubik F. & Scholl G. (1996). Product policy in Europe: New environmental perspectives. International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment 1(3) 179–179.

  • Osis L. (2010). What is a green procurement how to understand it and take it. Retrieved on 15 February 2019 from

  • O’Rourke D. & Lollo N. (2015). Transforming consumption: from decoupling to behaviour change to system changes for sustainable consumption. Annual Review of Environment and Resources 40(1) 233–259.

  • Parikka-Alhola K. (2008). Promoting environmentally sound furniture by green public procurement. Ecological Economics 68(1-2) 472–485.

  • Preuss L. (2009). Addressing sustainable development through public procurement: the case of local government. Supply Chain Management 14(3) 213–223.

  • Rainville A. (2017). Standards in green public procurement – A framework to enhance innovation. Journal of Cleaner Production 167 1029–1037.

  • Reichel A. De Schoenmaker M. Gillabel J. (2016). Circular economy in Europe. EEA Report/No 2/2016. Luxembourg: Publications Office of the European Union.

  • Saeima of the Republic of Latvia. (2010). Sustainable Development Strategy of Latvia until 2030.

  • Saeima of the Republic of Latvia. (2011). Spatial Development Planning Law Latvijas Vēstnesis 173(4571).

  • Testa F. Iraldo F. & Frey M. (2011). The effect of environmental regulation on firms’ competitive performance: the case of the building and construction sector in some EU regions. Journal of Environmental Management 92(9) 2136–2144.

  • Testa F. Iraldo F. Frey M. & Daddi T. (2016). What factors influence he update of GPP practices? New evidence from an Italian survey. Journal of Cleaner Production 112(Part 3) 1893–1900.

  • Vergragt P. J. Dendler L. de Jong M. Matus K. (2016). Transitions to sustainable consumption and production in cities. Journal of Cleaner Production 134 (Part A) 1–12.

  • UN DESA. (2015). World Population Prospects: The 2015 Revision Key Findings and Advance Tables Working Paper No ESA/P/WP.241 United Nations Department of Economic and Social Affairs Population Division New York.

  • United Nations. (1992). United Nations Conference on Environment and Development Rio de Janerio Brazil 3–14 June 1992. Retrieved on 14 July 2019 from

Journal information
All Time Past Year Past 30 Days
Abstract Views 0 0 0
Full Text Views 43 43 19
PDF Downloads 47 47 21