Industry Specifics and Consumers’ Reactions to Business Crises

Open access


Different scientific studies provide many valuable recommendations how to manage crises in order to lessen their negative effect on relations with consumers. But the question whether the same business crises management rules can be applied for different industries, or they must be adapted depending on industries specifics, has not received sufficient scientific attention. Knowledge gaps about industry specific effect on consumer reactions to business crises remain. This study focuses on understanding the differences in consumers’ reactions in business crises situations with regard to controversial evaluation in the society of “the sin industries” (alcohol, tobacco, gambling, etc.) and ordinary industries (not having controversial associations). Experimental research design, including online experiment with tobacco, beer and functional soft drinks consumers (in total 306 respondents), was chosen for competing research hypotheses testing. Empirical evidence was in line with theoretical argumentation about less negative consumers’ reactions during business crises in case of “sin industries” versus ordinary industry. This study shows that consumers attitudes, such as perception of company’s product quality, trust, social responsibility and behavioural intentions, such as intention to buy and recommend company’s products, are less negative during business crises in lower reputation “sin industries” than in ordinary industries.

If the inline PDF is not rendering correctly, you can download the PDF file here.

  • Ahluwalia R. Burnkrant R. E. & Unnava H. R. (2000). Consumer Response to Negative Publicity: The Moderating Role of Commitment. Journal of Marketing Research 37(2) 203-214.

  • Ajzen I. (1991). The theory of planned behavior. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes 50(2) 179-211.

  • Alpaslan C. M. Green S. E. & Mitroff I. I. (2009). Corporate Governance in the Context of Crises: Towards a Stakeholder Theory of Crisis Management. Journal of Contingencies and Crisis Management 17(1) 38-49.

  • Assiouras I. Ozgen O. & Skourtis G. (2013). The impact of corporate social responsibility in food industry in product-harm crises. British Food Journal 115(1) 108-123.

  • Bhattacharya C. B. & Sen S. (2003). Consumer-Company Identification: A Framework for Understanding Consumers’ Relationships with Companies. Journal of Marketing 67(2) 76-88.

  • Bronn S. P. & Berg R. W (2009). Corporate communication: A strategic approach to building reputation. 2nd edition Oslo: Gyndeldal akademisk.

  • Berens G. Riel C. B. M. van & Bruggen G. H. van. (2005). Corporate Associations and Consumer Product Responses: The Moderating Role of Corporate Brand Dominance. Journal of Marketing 69(3) 35-48.

  • Cai Y. Jo H. & Pan C. (2011). Doing Well While Doing Bad? CSR in Controversial Industry Sectors. Journal of Business Ethics 108(4) 467-480.

  • Cleeren K. van Heerde H. J. & Dekimpe M. G. (2013). Rising from the Ashes: How Brands and Categories Can Overcome Product-Harm Crises. Journal of Marketing 77(2) 58-77.

  • Coombs W. T. (2004). Impact of Past Crises on Current Crisis Communication: Insights From Situational Crisis Communication Theory. Journal of Business Communication 41(3) 265-289.

  • Coombs W. T. (2007). Protecting Organization Reputations During a Crisis: The Development and Application of Situational Crisis Communication Theory. Corporate Reputation Review 10(3) 163-176.

  • Coombs W.T. & Holladay S. J. (2006). Unpacking the halo effect: Reputation and crisis management. Journal of Communication Management 10(2) 123-137.

  • Coombs W.T. & Holladay S. J. (2007). The negative communication dynamic: Exploring the impact of stakeholder affect on behavioral intentions. Journal of Communication Management 11(4) 300-312.

  • Currás-Pérez R. Bigné-Alcañiz E. & Alvarado-Herrera A. (2009). The Role of Self-Definitional Principles in Consumer Identification with a Socially Responsible Company. Journal of Business Ethics 89(4) 547-564.

  • Davidson D. K. (2003). Selling Sin: The marketing of socially unacceptable products 2nd edition. Westport CT: Praeger.

  • Dean D. H. (2004). Consumer Reaction to Negative Publicity: Effects of Corporate Reputation Response and Responsibility for a Crisis Event. Journal of Business Communication 41(2) 192-211.

  • Dowling G. (2002). Creating corporate reputations: Identity image and performance. New York: Oxford University Press.

  • Erdem T. & Keane M. P. (1996). Decision-Making Under Uncertainty: Capturing Dynamic Brand Choice Processes in Turbulent Consumer Goods Markets. Marketing Science 15(1) 1-20.

  • French S. L. & Holden T. Q. (2012). Positive Organizational Behavior. Business Communication Quarterly 75(2) 208-220.

  • Grabauskas V. Klumbienė J. Petkevičienė J. Šakytė E. Kriaučionienė V. and Veryga A. (2013). Suaugusių Lietuvos žmonių gyvensenos tyrimas 2012. Kaunas: Lietuvos sveikatos mokslų universitetas Medicinos akademija. Retrieved from

  • Grappi S. & Romani S. (2015). Company Post-Crisis Communication Strategies and the Psychological Mechanism Underlying Consumer Reactions. Journal of Public Relations Research 27(1) 22-45.

  • Haas-Kotzegger U. & Schlegelmilch B. B. (2013). Conceptualising consumers experiences of product-harm crises. Journal of Consumer Marketing 30(2) 112-120.

  • Hong H. & Kacperczyk M. (2009). The price of sin: The effects of social norms on markets. Journal of Financial Economics 93(1) 15-36.

  • Hwang P. & Lichtenthal J. D. (2000). Anatomy of Organizational Crises. Journal of Contingencies and Crisis Management 8(3) 129-140.

  • Johnson D. & Grayson K. (2005). Cognitive and affective trust in service relationships. Journal of Business Research 58(4) 500-507.

  • Keane T. P. (2006). Exploring stakeholder emotional intelligence. Management Research News 29(3) 128-138.

  • Kim I. & Venkatachalam M. (2011). Are Sin Stocks Paying the Price for Accounting Sins? Journal of Accounting Auditing & Finance 26(2) 415-442.

  • Klein J. & Dawar N. (2004). Corporate social responsibility and consumers' attributions and brand evaluations in a product-harm crisis International Journal of Research in Marketing 21(3) 203-217.

  • Lerbinger O. (2012). The Crisis Manager: Facing Disasters Conflicts and Failures. New York: Routledge.

  • Lin C.-P. Chen S.-C. Chiu C.-K. & Lee W.-Y. (2011). Understanding Purchase Intention During Product-Harm Crises: Moderating Effects of Perceived Corporate Ability and Corporate Social Responsibility. Journal of Business Ethics 102(3) 455-471.

  • Lindorff M. Prior Jonson E. & McGuire L. (2012). Strategic Corporate Social Responsibility in Controversial Industry Sectors: The Social Value of Harm Minimisation. Journal of Business Ethics 110(4) 457-467.

  • Madden T. J. Roth M. S. & Dillon W. R. (2012). Global Product Quality and Corporate Social Responsibility Perceptions: A Cross-National Study of Halo Effects. Journal of International Marketing 20(1) 42-57.

  • Miklós-Thal J. & Zhang J. (2013). (De)marketing to Manage Consumer Quality Inferences. Journal of Marketing Research 50(1) 55-69.

  • Mohr L. A. & Webb D. J. (2005). The effects of corporate social responsibility and price on consumer responses. Journal of Consumer Affairs 39(1) 121-147.

  • Petroshius S. M. & Monroe K. B. (1987). Effect of Product-Line Pricing Characteristics on Product Evaluations. Journal of Consumer Research 13(4) 511-519.

  • Sirdeshmukh D. Singh J. & Sabol B. (2002). Consumer Trust Value and Loyalty in Relational Exchanges. Journal of Marketing 66(1) 15-37.

  • Sprott D. E. & Shimp T. A. (2004). Using product sampling to augment the perceived quality of store brands. Journal of Retailing 80(4) 305-315.

  • Uhlmann E. Tannenbaum D. Heinze J. Srinivasan M. Brescoll V.L. Newman G. Galinsky A. & Diermeier D. (2010). The role of trust in reputation management. Retrieved 10/05/20140 from

  • Zhao Y. Zhao Y. & Helsen K. (2011). Consumer Learning in a Turbulent Market Environment: Modeling Consumer Choice Dynamics After a Product-Harm Crisis. Journal of Marketing Research 48(2) 255-267.

Journal information
All Time Past Year Past 30 Days
Abstract Views 0 0 0
Full Text Views 1180 943 65
PDF Downloads 297 145 3