Assessment of Impact of Corporate Income Tax Suspension on Financial Performance of Businesses

Valentīna Bizņa 1 , Māris Jurušs 1 , Tālis Laizāns 1 , and Roberts Šnikvalds 1
  • 1 Riga Technical University,, Riga, Latvia

Abstract

Though there are a number of data and studies about the impact of tax incentives on investment, research and development, no detailed and systematic analysis has been elaborated on the effectiveness of taxation of profit to the financial performance of businesses in general. Businesses avoid corporate income tax to get more net profit. Evasion leads to economic stagnation. It is time to call for changes of the corporate income tax system and introduce tax suspension - tax only shared profit. The aim of the research is to assess the impact of corporate income tax suspension on retained corporate income. The research extends applicable theoretical foundation and comprehension of elements and factors affecting firms’ behaviour. The results show that the corporate income tax reform would change capital structure of businesses and improve company’s sustainability. The findings also give grounds for the development of an applicable model that would help government authorities choose the most effective way of taxation of corporate income.

If the inline PDF is not rendering correctly, you can download the PDF file here.

  • Amadeus. (2016). A Database Containing Financial Information on Approximately 8 Million Public and Private Companies in 38 European Countries. Retrieved from https://www.bvdinfo.com/en-us/our-products/company-information/international-products/amadeus

  • Badertscher, B., Katz, S. P., & Rego, S. O. (2009). The Impact of Private Equity Ownership on Corporate Tax Avoidance. Harvard Business School Working Papers 10-004. Retrieved from: https://ideas.repec.org/p/hbs/wpaper/10-004.html

  • Devereux, M. P., Griffith, R., & Klemm, A. (2002). Corporate Income Tax Reforms and International Tax Competition. Economic policy, 17(35), 449-495. https://doi.org/10.1111/1468-0327.00094

  • Domnīca Certus. (2016). Competitiveness of Latvia. Report about Taxation. Retrieved from http://certusdomnica.lv/

  • Eurostat. (2016). Foreign Direct Investments in % of GDP. Retrieved from: http://ec.europa.eu/eurostar

  • Gorter, J., & Mooij, R. A. (2001). Capital Income Taxation in Europe: Trends and Trend-offs. Retrieved from:https://www.researchgate.net/profile/Ruud_Mooij/publication/4748914_Capital_Income_Taxation_in_Europe_Trends_and_Trade-offs/links/00b4952323a5b54055000000.pdf

  • Graetz, M. J., & Warren Jr., A. C. (2016). Integration of Corporate and Shareholder Taxes. National Tax Journal, 69(3), 677-700. https://doi.org/10.17310/ntj.2016.3.07

  • Gruevski, I., & Gaber, S. (2015). Classical Corporation Tax System: the Classical Model of Pure “Double” Taxation of Company’s Income. Economic Development, 17(3), 241-254.

  • Guziejewska, B., Grabowski, W., & Bryndziak, S. (2014). Tax Competition Strategies in Corporate Income Tax - the Case of EU Countries. Business & Economic Horizons, 10(4), 253-271. https://doi.org/10.15208/beh.2014.21

  • Hazak, A. (2007). Companies’ Financial Decisions under the Distributed Profit Taxation Regime of Estonia. Working Papers in Economics, TUTWPE No 155, 5-19. Retrieved from: http://deepthought.ttu.ee/majandus/tekstid/TUTWPE_07_155.pdf

  • Hazak, A. (2009). Companies’ Financial Decision under the Distributed Profit Taxation Regime of Estonia. Emerging Markets Finance & Trade, 45(4), 4-12. https://doi.org/10.2753/REE1540-496X450401 .

  • Jurušs, M., Stinka, J., & Kūma, E. (2017, May). Shifting from Taxation of Corporate Income to Distributed Profit: The Concept for Latvia. XVIII Turiba University Conference Communication in the Global Village: Interests and Influence. 88-95.pp. Retrieved from: http://www.turiba.lv/f/Conference_XVIII_Turiba_18.05.2017.FINAL.pdf

  • Masso, J., Meriküll, J., Vahter, P. (2011). Gross Profit Taxation Versus Distributed Profit Taxation and Firm Performance: Effects of Estonia’s Corporate Income Tax Reform. University of Tartu: Faculty of Economics and Business Administration Working Paper Series, No. 81, 1-33. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.1793143

  • Masso, J., Meriküll, J., & Vahter, P. (2013). Shift from Gross Profit Taxation to Distributed Profit Taxation: Are There Effects on Firms? Journal of Comparative Economics, 41, 1092-1105. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jce.2013.01.011

  • Ministry of Economics (2016). Report on the Latvian economy. Retrieved November 7, 2016, from https://www.em.gov.lv/files/tautsaimniecibas_attistiba/2016_jun.pdf.

  • Nasyrov, N., & Shtyrlyaeva, V. (2015). The Need to Cancel the Double Taxation of Dividends. Finance & Credit, 21(17), 46-52.

  • Prohorovs, A., Fainglozs, L., & Jonina, V. (2016). Introduction of the Deferral of corporate Income Tax before the Distribution of Company Profits as an Essential Factor for the Development of the Latvian Economy. RISEBA Working Paper 16/9. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2939173

OPEN ACCESS

Journal + Issues

Search