What is the Problem with Model-based Explanation in Economics?

Open access

Abstract

The question of whether the idealized models of theoretical economics are explanatory has been the subject of intense philosophical debate. It is sometimes presupposed that either a model provides the actual explanation or it does not provide an explanation at all. Yet, two sets of issues are relevant to the evaluation of model-based explanation: what conditions should a model satisfy in order to count as explanatory and does the model satisfy those conditions. My aim in this paper is to unpack this distinction and show that separating the first set of issues from the second is crucial to an accurate diagnosis of the distinctive challenges that economic models pose. Along the way I sketch a view of model-based explanation in economics that focuses on the role that non-empirical and empirical strategies play in increasing confidence in the adequacy of a given model-based explanation.

Alexandrova, Anna. 2008. Making models count. Philosophy of Science 75: 383–404.

Alexandrova, Anna; and Northcott, Robert. 2013. It’s just a feeling: why economic models do not explain. Journal of Economic Methodology 20(3): 262–8.

Axelrod, Robert. 1984. The Evolution of Cooperation. Penguin.

Aydinonat, Emrah. 2008. The Invisible Hand in Economics: How Economists Explain Unintended Consequences. London/New York: Routledge.

Backhouse, Roger. 2007. Representation in economics. In Measurement in Economics: A Handbook. Ed. by M. Boumans. Elsevier: 135–52.

Basso, Alessandra; Chiara Lisciandra; and Caterina Marchionni. 2017. Hypothetical models in social science. In Springer Handbook of Model-Based Science, ed. by Magnani and Bertolotti. Springer: 413–33.

Bokulich, Alisa. 2014. How the tiger bush got its stripes: ‘how possibly’ vs. ‘how actually’ model explanations. The Monist 97(3): 321–38.

Bokulich, Alisa. 2009. Explanatory fictions. In Fictions in Science: Philosophical Essays on Modeling and Idealization, ed. by M. Suárez. London: Routledge, 91–109.

Clark, W.A.V. 1991. Residential preferences and neighbourhood racial segregation: a test of the Schelling segregation model. Demography 28 (1): 1–19.

Cartwright, Nancy. 1999. The vanity of rigour in economics: theoretical models and Galileian experiments. In The ‘Experiment’ in the History of Economics, ed. by P. Fontaine and R. Leonard. Routledge, 135–53.

Cartwright, Nancy. 2002. The limits of casual order, from economics to physics. In Fact and Fiction in Economics, ed. by U. Mäki. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 137–51.

Cartwright, Nancy. 2009. If no capacities then no credible worlds. But can models reveal capacities? Erkenntnis 70: 45–58.

Fumagalli, Roberto. 2016. Why we cannot learn from minimal models. Erkenntnis 81 (3): 433–55.

Garfinkel, Alan. 1981. Forms of Explanation. New Haven: Yale University Press.

Grüne-Yanoff, Till. 2009. Learning from minimal economic models. Erkenntnis 70: 81–99.

Grüne-Yanoff, Till. 2013. Appraising models nonrepresentationally. Philosophy of Science 80: 1–12.

Hands, Wade. 2016. Derivational robustness analysis, credible substitute systems and mathematical economic models: the case of stability analysis in Walrasian general equilibrium theory. European Journal for the Philosophy of Science 6(1): 31–53.

Hausman, Dan. 2013. Paradox postponed. Journal of Economic Methodology 20(3): 250–4.

Hempel, Carl G. 1965. Aspects of Scientific Explanation and Other Essays in the Philosophy of Science. New York: Free Press.

Hindriks, Frank. 2006. Tractability assumptions and the Musgrave-Mäki typology. Journal of Economic Methodology 13: 401–23.

Holt, Charles; Johnson, Cathleen; and Schmidtz, David. 2015. Prisoner’s Dilemma experiments. In The Prisoner’s Dilemma, ed. by M. Peterson. Cambridge University Press: 243–64.

Kirkham, Richard L. 1992. Theories of Truth. A Critical Introduction. The MIT Press.

Kuorikoski, Jaakko; Lehtinen, Aki; and Marchionni, Caterina. 2010. Economic modelling as robustness analysis. British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 61: 541–67.

Kuorikoski, Jaakko; Lehtinen, Aki; and Marchionni, Caterina. 2012. Robustness analysis disclaimer: please read the manual before use. Biology and Philosophy 27 (6): 891–902.

Jackson, Frank; and Pettit, Philip. 1990. Program explanation: a general perspective. Analysis 50: 107–17.

Lehtinen, Aki. 2016. Allocating confirmation with derivational robustness. Philosophical Studies 173 (9): 2487–509.

Ledyard, John. 1995. Public goods: a survey of experimental research. In The Handbook of Experimental Economics, ed. by J. Kagel and A. Roth.Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 111–94.

Levins, Richard. 1966. The strategy of model building in population biology. In Conceptual Issues in Evolutionary Biology (1st ed.), ed. by E. Sober. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press: 18–27.

Lloyd, E. 2010. Confirmation and robustness of climate models. Philosophy of Science 77(5): 971–84.

Mäki, Uskali. 2009. MISSing the world. Models as isolations and credible surrogate systems. Erkenntnis 70: 29–43.

Mäki, Uskali. 2013. On a paradox of truth, or how not to obscure the issue of whether explanatory models can be true. Journal of Economic Methodology 20(3): 268–79.

Marchionni, Caterina. 2008. Explanatory pluralism and complementarity: from autonomy to integration. Philosophy of the Social Sciences 38: 314–33.

Marchionni, Caterina. 2013. Playing with networks: How economists explain. European Journal for Philosophy of Science 3(3): 331–52.

Northcott, Robert. 2013. Degree of explanation. Synthese 190 (15): 3087–105.

Northcott, Robert; and Alexandrova, Anna. 2015. Prisoner’s Dilemma doesn’t explain much. In The Prisoner’s Dilemma, ed. by M. Peterson. Cambridge University Press, 64–84.

Norton, J. 2011. Analogy. Unpublished draft, University of Pittsburg. http://www.pitt.edu/~jdnorton/papers/Analogy.pdf.

Odenbaugh, Jay; and Alexandrova, Anna. 2011. Buyer beware: robustness analyses in economics and biology. Biology and Philosophy 26: 757–71.

Reiss, Julian. 2012. The explanation paradox. Journal of Economic Methodology 19 (1): 43–62.

Rohwer Yasha. and Rice Collin. 2016. How are models and explanations related? Erkenntnis 81 (5): 1127–48.

Rice, Collin. 2015. Moving beyond causes: optimality models and scientific explanation. Noûs 49(3): 589–615.

Rodrik, Dani. 2015. Economics Rules. Why Economics Works, When It Fails, and How To Tell The Difference. Oxford University Press.

Reutlinger, Alexander; Hangleiter, Dominik; and Hartmann, Stephan. 2017. Understanding with (toy) models. British Journal for the Philosophy of Science.https://doi.org/10.1093/bjps/axx005

Schelling, Thomas. 1978. Micromotives and Macrobehavior. London: W.W. Norton.

Steel, Daniel. 2013. Mechanisms and extrapolation in the abortion-crime controversy. In Mechanisms and Causality in Biology and Economics, ed. by H-K Chao, S-T Chen and R. Millstein. Springer, New York: 185–206.

Sugden, Robert. 2000. Credible worlds: the status of theoretical models in economics. Journal of Economic Methodology 7: 1–31.

Tsvetkova, Milena; Nilsson, Olof; Öhman, Camilla; Sumpter, Lovisa; and Sumpter, David. 2016. An experimental study of segregation mechanisms. EPJ Data Science 5: 4 DOI: 10.1140/epjds/s13688-016-0065-5.

Weisberg, Michael. 2006. Forty years of “The Strategy”: Levins on model building and idealization. Biology and Philosophy 21(5): 623–45.

Weisberg, Michael. 2013. Simulation and Similarity. Oxford University Press.

Wimsatt, William. 1981. Robustness, reliability, and overdetermination. In Scientific Inquiry and the Social Sciences, ed. by M. Brewer and B. Collins. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass: 124–63.

Woodward, James. 2003. Making Things Happen: A Theory of Causal Explanation. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Woodward, James. 2006. Some varieties of robustness. Journal of Economic Methodology 13: 219–40.

Ylikoski, Petri; and Aydinonat, Emrah. 2014. Understanding with theoretical models. Journal of Economic Methodology 21(1): 19–36.

Ylikoski, Petri; and Kuorikoski, Jaakko. 2010. Dissecting explanatory power. Philosophical Studies 148 (2): 201–219.

Disputatio

International Journal of Philosophy

Journal Information

Metrics

All Time Past Year Past 30 Days
Abstract Views 0 0 0
Full Text Views 65 65 65
PDF Downloads 67 67 67