This paper shows that the following common assumption is false: that in modal-logical representations of higher-order vagueness, for there to be borderline cases to borderline cases ad infinitum, the number of possible distinct modalities in a modal system must be infinite.
If the inline PDF is not rendering correctly, you can download the PDF file here.
Åkerman, Jonas and Greenough, Patrick. 2010. Hold the Context Fixed: Vagueness Still Remains. In Cuts and Clouds: Vagueness, its Nature, and its Logic. Edited by Dietz, Richard and Moruzzi, Sebastian. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 275-88.
Bobzien, Susanne. 2012. If it’s Clear, then it’s Clear that it’s Clear, or is it?
Bobzien, Susanne Higher-order Vagueness and the S4 Axiom. In Episteme, etc. Edited by Katerina Ierodiakonou and Benjamin Morison. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 189-212.
Bobzien, Susanne. 2013. Higher-order Vagueness and Borderline Nestings — a Persistent Confusion. Analytic Philosophy 54: 1-43.
Carnielli, Walter and Pizzi, Claudio. 2009. Modalities and Multimodalities. New York: Springer.
Chellas, Brian F. 1980. Modal Logic: An Introduction. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Fara, Delia Graff. 2003. Gap principles, penumbral consequence and infinitely higher-order vagueness. In Liars and Heaps: New Essays on Paradox. Edited by J. C. Beall.Oxford: Oxford University Press, 195-222. Originally published under the name ‘Delia Graff’.
Greenough, Patrick. 2005. Contextualism about Vagueness and Higher-Order
Vagueness. Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society (suppl) 105: 167-90.
Sainsbury, Mark. 1991. Is There Higher-Order Vagueness? Philosophical Quarterly 41: 167-82.
Shapiro, Stewart. 2005. Context, Conversation, and so-called ‘Higher-Order Vagueness’. Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society (suppl) 105: 147-65.