Yablo’s Paradox and Beginningless Time

Open access


The structure of Yablo’s paradox is analysed and generalised in order to show that beginningless step-by-step determination processes can be used to provoke antinomies, more concretely, to make our logical and our ontological intuitions clash. The flow of time and the flow of causality are usually conceived of as intimately intertwined, so that temporal causation is the very paradigm of a step-by-step determination process. As a consequence, the paradoxical nature of beginningless step-by-step determination processes concerns time and causality as usually conceived.

If the inline PDF is not rendering correctly, you can download the PDF file here.

  • Benardete José A. 1964. Infinity: An Essay in Metaphysics. Oxford: Clarendon Press.

  • Bueno Otávio. and Colyvan Mark. 2003. Yablo’s paradox and referring to infinite objects. Australasian Journal of Philosophy 81: 402-412.

  • Goldstein Laurence. 2006. Fibonacci Yablo and the cassationist approach to paradox. Mind 115: 867-889.

  • Priest Graham. 1997. Yablo’s paradox. Analysis 57: 236-42.

  • Priest Graham. 1999. On a version of one of Zeno’s paradoxes. Analysis 59: 1-2.

  • Shackel Nicholas. 2005. The form of the Benardete dichotomy. Brit. J. Phil. Sci. 56: 397-417.

  • Yablo Stephen. 1993. Paradox without self-reference. Analysis 53: 251-252.

  • Yablo Stephen. 2000. A reply to new Zeno. Analysis 60: 148-151.

Journal information
Impact Factor

CiteScore 2018: 0.25

SCImago Journal Rank (SJR) 2018: 0.154
Source Normalized Impact per Paper (SNIP) 2018: 0.348

Cited By
All Time Past Year Past 30 Days
Abstract Views 0 0 0
Full Text Views 58 45 3
PDF Downloads 40 35 0