Social Explanation: Structures, Stories, and Ontology. A Reply to Díaz León, Saul, and Sterken

Open access


In response to commentaries by Esa Díaz León, Jennifer Saul, and Ra- chel Sterken, I develop more fully my views on the role of structure in social and metaphysical explanation. Although I believe that social agency, quite generally, occurs within practices and structures, the relevance of structure depends on the sort of questions we are asking and what interventions we are considering. The emphasis on questions is also relevant in considering metaphysical and meta-metaphysical is- sues about realism with respect to gender and race. I aim to demon- strate that tools we develop in the context of critical social theory can change the questions we ask, what forms of explanation are called for, and how we do philosophy.

If the inline PDF is not rendering correctly, you can download the PDF file here.

  • Anderson Elizabeth S. 1995. Knowledge human interests and objectivity in feminist epistemology. Philosophical Topics 23(2): 27–58.

  • Cudd Ann. 2006. Analyzing Oppression. Oxford University Press.

  • Barnes Elizabeth. 2014. Going beyond the fundamental: feminism in contemporary metaphysics. Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society 104(3): 335–51.

  • Barnes Elizabeth. 2017. Realism and social structure. Philosophical Studies 174(10): 2417–33. DOI: 10.1007/s11098-016-0743-y

  • Burge Tyler. 1979. Individualism and the mental. Midwest Studies in Philosophy 4 (1): 73–122.

  • Epstein Brian. 2009. Ontological individualism reconsidered. Synthese 166(1): 187–213.

  • Epstein Brian. 2015. The Ant Trap. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

  • Garfinkel Alan. 1981. Forms of Explanation: Rethinking the Questions in Social Theory. New Haven: Yale University Press.

  • Glasgow Joshua. 2009. A Theory of Race. New York: Routledge.

  • Haslanger Sally. 2000 Gender race: (what) are they? (What) do we want them to be? Noûs 34(1): 31–55.

  • Haslanger Sally. 2006. What good are our intuitions: philosophical analysis and social kinds. Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society Supplementary Volume 80(1): 89–118.

  • Haslanger Sally. 2010. Language politics and ‘the folk’: looking for the Meaning of ‘Race’. The Monist 93(2): 169–87.

  • Haslanger Sally. 2016. What is a (social) structural explanation? Philosophical Studies 173: 113–30.

  • Haslanger Sally. Forthcoming. Going on not in the same way. In Conceptual Ethics and Conceptual Engineering ed. by Herman Cappelen and David Plunkett. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

  • Haslanger Sally. 2017. Racism ideology and social movements. Res Philosophica 94(1): 1–22.

  • Jackson Frank; and Philip Pettit. 1992. Structural explanation in social theory. In Reduction Explanation and Realism ed. by David Charles and Kathleen Lennon. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

  • Kripke Saul. 1980. Naming and Necessity. Cambridge MA: Harvard University Press.

  • Mallon Ron. 2006. ‘Race’: normative not metaphysical or semantic. Ethics 116(3): 525–51.

  • Okin Susan. 1989. Justice Gender and the Family. NY: Basic Books.

  • Pérez Carballo Alejandro. 2016. Structuring logical space. Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 92(2): 460–91.

  • Quine W. V. O. 1960. Word and Object. Cambridge MA: Harvard University Press.

  • Putnam Hilary. 1975. The meaning of ‘meaning’. In Mind Language and Reality. Vol. 2 of Philosophical Papers. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

  • Risjord Mark W. 2000. Woodcutters and Witchcraft. Albany: SUNY Press.

  • Schroeter Laura; and Francois Schroeter. 2015. Rationalizing self-interpretation. In The Palgrave Handbook of Philosophical Methods ed. by Chris Daly. Basingstoke: Palgrave-Macmillan pp. 419–47.

  • Stalnaker Robert. 1998. What might nonconceptual content be? Philosophical Issues 9: 339–52.

  • Sewell William. 1992. A theory of structure: duality agency and transformation. American Journal of Sociology 98(1): 1–29.

  • Skow Bradford. 2018. Causation Explanation and the Metaphysics of Aspect. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

  • Thomasson A. 2015. Ontology Made Easy. Oxford University Press.

  • Tilly Charles. 2002. The trouble with stories. In Stories Identities and Political Change. Lanham MD: Rowman and Littlefield pp. 25–42.

  • Witt Charlotte. 2011. The Metaphysics of Gender. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

  • Yalcin Seth. 2016. Belief as question sensitive. Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 97(1): 23–47.

  • Zheng Robin. 2018. Bias structure and injustice: a reply to Haslanger. Feminist Philosophy Quarterly 4(1): Article 4. doi:10.5206/fpq/2018.1.4.

Journal information
Impact Factor

CiteScore 2018: 0.25

SCImago Journal Rank (SJR) 2018: 0.154
Source Normalized Impact per Paper (SNIP) 2018: 0.348

All Time Past Year Past 30 Days
Abstract Views 0 0 0
Full Text Views 183 183 27
PDF Downloads 157 157 23