Space Emergence in Contemporary Physics: Why We Do Not Need Fundamentality, Layers of Reality and Emergence

Baptiste Le Bihan 1
  • 1 University of Geneva,


‘Space does not exist fundamentally: it emerges from a more fundamental non-spatial structure.’ This intriguing claim appears in various research programs in contemporary physics. Philosophers of physics tend to believe that this claim entails either that spacetime does not exist, or that it is derivatively real. In this article, I introduce and defend a third metaphysical interpretation of the claim: reductionism about space. I argue that, as a result, there is no need to subscribe to fundamentality, layers of reality and emergence in order to analyse the constitution of space by non-spatial entities. It follows that space constitution, if borne out, does not provide empirical evidence in favour of a stratified, Aristotelian in spirit, metaphysics. The view will be described in relation to two particular research programs in contemporary physics: wave function realism and loop quantum gravity.

If the inline PDF is not rendering correctly, you can download the PDF file here.

  • Albert, David Z. 2015. After Physics. Harvard University Press.

  • Bennett, Karen. 2017. Making Things Up. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

  • Benovsky, Jiri. 2010. Relational and substantival ontologies, and the nature and the role of primitives in ontological theories. Erkenntnis 73(1): 101–121.

  • Benovsky, Jiri. 2015. From experience to metaphysics: on experience-based intuitions and their role in metaphysics. Noûs 49(4): 684–97.

  • Benovsky, Jiri. 2016. Eliminativism and gunk. Teorema: International Journal of Philosophy 35(1): 59–66.

  • Butterfield, Jeremy. 2011. Emergence, reduction and supervenience: a varied landscape. Foundations of Physics 41(6): 920–59.

  • Chalmers, David J. 1995. Facing up to the problem of consciousness. Journal of Consciousness Studies 2(3): 200–19.

  • Chalmers, David J. Forthcoming. The meta-problem of consciousness, manuscript,

  • Correia, Fabrice; and Schnieder, Benjamin 2012. Grounding: An Opinionated Introduction. In Metaphysical Grounding: Understanding the Structure of Reality, edited by F. Correia and B. Schnieder. Cambridge University Press.

  • Crowther, Karen J. 2016. Effective Spacetime: Understanding Emergence in Effective Field Theory and Quantum Gravity. New York, NY: Springer.

  • Crowther, Karen J. 2018. Inter-theory relations in quantum gravity: correspondence, reduction, and emergence. Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part B: Studies in History and Philosophy of Modern Physics 63: 74–85.

  • Fine, Kit. 2001. The question of realism. Philosophers’ Imprint 1(1): 1–30.

  • Heil, John. 2003a. From an Ontological Point of View. Oxford University Press.

  • Heil, John. 2003b. Levels of reality. Ratio 16(3): 205–21.

  • Huggett, Nick. 2017. Target space ≠ space. Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part B: Studies in History and Philosophy of Modern Physics. doi:10.1016/j. shpsb.2015.08.007.

  • Huggett, Nick; and Wüthrich, Christian. 2013. Emergent spacetime and empirical (in)coherence. Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part B: Studies in History and Philosophy of Modern Physics 44(3): 276–85.

  • Humphreys, Paul. 2016. Emergence. New York: Oxford University Press.

  • Lam, Vincent; and Wüthrich, Christian. Forthcoming. Spacetime is as spacetime does. Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part B: Studies in History and Philosophy of Modern Physics 64: 39–51.

  • Le Bihan, Baptiste. 2013. Why a gunk world is compatible with nihilism about objects. Studia Philosophica Estonica 6(1): 1–14.

  • Le Bihan, Baptiste. 2015. The unrealities of time. Dialogue 54(1): 25–44.

  • Le Bihan, Baptiste. 2016. Super-relationism: combining eliminativism about objects and relationism about spacetime. Philosophical Studies 173(8): 2151–72.

  • Le Bihan, Baptiste. 2018. Priority monism beyond spacetime. Metaphysica, 19(1): 95–111.

  • Le Bihan, Baptiste; and Linnemann, Niels. Forthcoming. Have we lost spacetime on the way? Narrowing the gap between general relativity and quantum gravity. Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part B: Studies in History and Philosophy of Modern Physics.

  • Le Bihan, Baptiste; and Read, James. Forthcoming. Duality and ontology. Philosophy Compass.

  • Lewis, Peter J. 2004. Life in configuration Space. British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 55(4): 713–29.

  • McLaughlin, Brian P. 1992. The rise and fall of British emergentism. In Emergence or Reduction? Prospects for Nonreductive Physicalism, edited by A. Beckermann, H. Flohr and J. Kim. Berlin: De Gruyter.

  • McTaggart, John. 1908. The unreality of time. Mind 17(68): 457–74.

  • Mellor, D. H. 1998. Real Time II. New York: Routledge.

  • Miller, Kristie; and James Norton. 2017. Grounding, it’s (probably) all in the head. Philosophical Studies 174(12): 3059–81.

  • Monton, Bradley. 2002. Wave function ontology. Synthese 130(2): 265–77.

  • Monton, Bradley. 2006. Quantum mechanics and 3N dimensional space. Philosophy of Science 73(5): 778–89.

  • Ney, Alyssa. 2012. The status of our ordinary three dimensions in a quantum universe. Noûs 46(3): 525–60.

  • Ney, Alyssa. 2015. Fundamental physical ontologies and the constraint of empirical coherence: a defense of wave function realism. Synthese 192(10): 3105–24.

  • Oaklander, L. Nathan. 1987. Temporal relations and temporal becoming: a defense of a Russellian theory of time. Noûs 21(1): 75–7.

  • Paul, L. A. 2002. Logical parts. Noûs 36(4): 578–96.

  • Paul, L. A. 2010. Temporal experience. Journal of Philosophy 107(7): 333–59.

  • Paul, L. A. 2012. Building the world from its fundamental constituents. Philosophical Studies 158(2): 221–56.

  • Rovelli, Carlo. 2004. Quantum Gravity. Cambridge, Cambridge University Press.

  • Rovelli, Carlo; and Vidotto, Francesca. 2014. Covariant Loop Quantum Gravity. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

  • Schaffer, Jonathan. 2003. Is there a fundamental level? Noûs 37(3): 498–517.

  • Schaffer, Jonathan. 2010. Monism: the priority of the whole. Philosophical Review 119(1): 31–76.

  • Sider, Theodore. 1993. Van Inwagen and the possibility of gunk. Analysis 53(4): 285–9.

  • Simons, Peter M. 1987. Parts: A Study in Ontology. Oxford University Press.

  • Van Inwagen, Peter. 1990. Material Beings. Ithaca: Cornell University Press.

  • Wilson, Alastair. 2017. Metaphysical causation. Noûs 50(4): 723–51.

  • Wüthrich, Christian. 2017. Raiders of the lost spacetime. In Towards a Theory of Spacetime Theories, edited by D. Lehmkuhl, G. Schiemann and E. Scholz. New York: Springer.

  • Yates, David. Forthcoming. Thinking about spacetime. In Philosophy Beyond Spacetime, edited by C. Wüthrich, B. Le Bihan and N. Huggett. Oxford: Oxford University Press.


Journal + Issues