This research aims to improve the learning activity and achievement of a 10th grade class made up of 30 students in a vocational high school located in the city of Surakarta, Indonesia, by applying the Numbered Heads Together (NHT) approach. The experiment was divided into two stages of four activities each: planning, implementation, observation, and reflection. The comparative descriptive procedure was then used to analyze the data. Prior to the researach implementation, the learning activity was relatively low in the pre-stage of the experiment. However, after the NHT approach, the percentage of active students increased in stage 1 and stage 2. The result of the test also suggested a similar trend in student achievement. From this it can be concluded that the application of the NHT learning model improves engagement within the learning activity as well as the level of achievement.
If the inline PDF is not rendering correctly, you can download the PDF file here.
Aziz, A. A., Yusof, K. M., Udin, A., & Yatim, J. M. (2013). Development of students’ knowledge-behavioural changes in relation to sustainability through a case study. Procedia – Social and Behavioral Sciences102, 568–576. doi: 10.1016/j.sbspro.2013.10.773
Buhr, G. T., Heflin, M. T., White, H. K., & Pinheiro, S. O. (2014). Using the jigsaw cooperative learning method to teach medical students about long-term and postacute care. Journal of the American Medical Directors Association15(6), 429–434. doi: 10.1016/j.jamda.2014.01.015
Cakula, S. (2011). Technological support and problem-based learning as a means of formation of student’s creative experience. Discourse and Communication for Sustainable Education2(1), 46–55. doi: 10.2478/v10230-011-0003-5
Clinton, B. D., & Kohlmeyer, J. M. (2005). The effects of group quizzes on performance and motivation to learn: Two experiments in cooperative learning. Journal of Accounting Education23(2), 96–116. doi: 10.1016/j.jaccedu.2005.06.001
Çoklar, A. N., & Yurdakul, I. K. (2017). Technology integration experiences of teachers. Discourse and Communication for Sustainable Education8(1), 19–31.
Cottell, P. G., & Millis, B. J. (1992). Cooperative learning in accounting. Journal of Accounting Education10(1), 95–111. doi: 10.1016/0748-5751(92)90019-2
de Leng, B. A., Dolmans, D. H. J. M., Jöbsis, R., Muijtjens, A. M. M., & van der Vleuten, C. P. M. (2009). Exploration of an e-learning model to foster critical thinking on basic science concepts during work placements. Computers & Education53(1), 1–13. doi: 10.1016/j.compedu.2008.12.012
Etter, E. R., Burmeister, S. L., & Elder, R. J. (2001). Improving student performance and retention via supplemental instruction. Journal of Accounting Education18(4), 355–368. doi: 10.1016/S0748-5751(01)00006-9
Gillies, R. M., Nichols, K., Burgh, G., & Haynes, M. (2014). Primary students’ scientific reasoning and discourse during cooperative inquiry-based science activities. International Journal of Educational Research63, 127–140. doi: 10.1016/j.ijer.2013.01.001
Iliško, Dz. (2016). Inquiry-based educational course in higher education towards sustainable communities: A case study. In Leal Filho W., & Pace P. (Eds.). Teaching education for sustainable development at university level, (pp. 125–145). doi: 10.1007/978-3-319-32928-4_9
Leasa, M., & Corebima, A. D. (2017). The effect of numbered heads together (NHT) cooperative learning model on the cognitive achievement of students with different academic ability. Journal of Physics: Conference Series795(1), 012071. doi: 10.1088/1742-6596/795/1/012071
McMillen, C., Mallette, B., Cynthia, S., Rey, J., Jabot, M., Michielli-Pendl, J., & Maheady, L. (2016). Effects of numbered heads together on the science quiz performance of the 9th grade students. Journal of Evidence-Based Practices for Schools15(1), 65–80.
Michael Nussbaum, E. (2008). Collaborative discourse, argumentation, and learning: Preface and literature review. Contemporary Educational Psychology33(3), 345–359. doi: 10.1016/j.cedpsych.2008.06.001
O’Neal, P. V., McClellan, L. C., & Jarosinski, J. M. (2016). A new model in teaching undergraduate research: A collaborative approach and learning cooperatives. Nurse Education in Practice18, 80–84. doi: 10.1016/j.nepr.2016.03.008
Pawattana, A., Prasarnpanich, S., & Attanawong, R. (2014). Enhancing primary school students’ social skills using cooperative learning in mathematics. Procedia – Social and Behavioral Sciences112, 656–661. doi: 10.1016/j.sbspro.2014.01.1214
Ravenscroft, S. P., Buckless, F. A., & Zuckerman, G. J. (1997). Student team learning – replication and extension. Rochester, NY: Social Science Research Network. Retrieved from https://papers.ssrn.com/abstract=46571
Ruengtam, P. (2013). Modeling of cooperative/collaborative learning technique: A case study of interior architectural program. Procedia – Social and Behavioral Sciences105, 360–369. doi: 10.1016/j.sbspro.2013.11.038
Salīte, I. G. Gedžūne, I., & Gedžūne, I. (2009). Educational action research for sustainability: Seeking wisdom of insight in teacher education. Journal of Teacher Education for Sustainability, 11(2): 14–30. doi: 10.2478/v10099-009-0037-y
Şengül, S., & Katranci, Y. (2014a). Effects of jigsaw technique on mathematics self-efficacy perceptions of seventh grade primary school students. Procedia – Social and Behavioral Sciences116, 333–338. doi: 10.1016/j.sbspro.2014.01.217
Şengül, S., & Katranci, Y. (2014b). Effects of jigsaw technique on seventh grade primary school students’ attitude towards mathematics. Procedia – Social and Behavioral Sciences116, 339–344. doi: 10.1016/j.sbspro.2014.01.218
Siegel, C. (2005). An ethnographic inquiry of cooperative learning implementation. Veronika Marta Wora, et al. Journal of School Psychology43(3), 219–239. doi: 10.1016/j.jsp.2005.04.005
Slavin, R. E., Hurley, E. A., & Chamberlain, A. M. (2001). Cooperative learning in schools. In N. J. Smelser & P. B. Baltes (Eds.), International Encyclopedia of the Social & Behavioral Sciences (pp. 2756–2761). Oxford: Pergamon. doi: 10.1016/B0-08-043076-7/02415-3
Zimele-Steina, I. (2013). Latvian piano teachers’ views on an ideal teaching aid for pupils – young pianists. Discourse and Communication for Sustainable Education4, 43–49.