The Significance of Context: Moral Education and Religious Education Facing the Challenge of Sustainability

Abstract

Education for sustainable development as presented by UNESCO involves a value dimension which is both pivotal and problematic. Pivotal, because values concern what matters to beings, problematic because the values brought forward are formulated as universal values, with the risk of suppressing the plurality of context.

The first part of the article develops a theoretical approach for a research project on environmental ethical values in moral education which accommodates for both universality and context. While the scope is mainly theoretical, some empirical material is brought in to illustrate and exemplify. The school subject involved includes religious education, and the empirical material shows that religion is a part of the context. However, this aspect is not accentuated in the theoretical approach presented.

The second part is a mediation between this theoretical approach on moral education and the interpretive approach addressing religious education. The aim is to explore common ground, uncover factual tension and reflect on how both moral education and religious education may contribute to environmental and sustainability education.

If the inline PDF is not rendering correctly, you can download the PDF file here.

  • Benhabib, S. (1986). Critique, norm and utopia. A study of the foundations of critical theory. New York: Columbia University Press.

  • Benhabib, S. (1996). The Reluctant modernism of Hannah Arendt. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.

  • Benhabib, S. (1992). Situating the self. Cambridge: Polity Press.

  • Benhabib, S. (2006). Another cosmopolitanism. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

  • Benhabib, S. (2011). Dignity in adversity: Human rights in troubled times. Oxford: Polity Press.

  • Conroy, J.C. (2014). Religious education at schools in Scotland. In M. Rothgangel, R. Jackson, & M. Jäggle (Eds.), Religious education at schools in Europe. Part 2: Western Europe (pp. 233–260). Göttingen: Vienna University Press.

  • Dillon, R.S. (2016). Respect. The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy (Winter 2016 Edition), Zalta, E. N.(ed.). Retrieved from https://plato.stanford.edu/archives/win2016/entries/respect/

  • Englund, T. (2011). The potential of education for creating mutual trust: Schools as sites for deliberation. Educational philosophy and theory, 43, (3), 236–248.

  • Gilligan, C. (1982). In a different voice: psychological theory and women’s development. London: Harvard University Press.

  • Gunnarsson, G.J. (2014). Religious education at schools in Iceland. In M. Rothgangel, G. Skeie & M. Jäggle (Eds.), Religious education at schools in Europe. Part 3: Northern Europe (pp. 127–150). Göttingen: Vienna University Press.

  • Huckle, J. (2008). Sustainable development. In J. Arthur, I. Davies & C. Hahn (Eds.), The Sage handbook of education for citizenship and democracy (pp. 342–354). London: Sage Publications.

  • Jackson, R. (1997). Religious education. An interpretive approach. London: Hodder & Stoughton.

  • Jackson, R. (2004). Rethinking religious education and plurality: issues in diversity a pedagogy. London: Routledge.

  • Jackson, R. (2016). A retrospective introduction to “Religious Education: an Interpretive Approach,Discourse and Communication for Sustainable Education, 7, (1), 149–160, doi: 10.1515/dcse-2016-0011

  • Jickling, B., & Wals, A. E. J. (2008). Globalization and environmental education: looking beyond sustainable development. Journal of Curriculum Studies, 40 (1), 1–21.

  • Kopnina, H. (2014). Revisiting education for sustainable development (ESD): Examining anthropocentric bias through the transition of environmental education to ESD. Sustainable Development, 22, 73–83.

  • Kronlid, D., & Öhman, J. (2013). An environmental ethical conceptual framework for research on sustainability and environmental education. Environmental Education Research, 19(1), 20–44.

  • Kvamme, O.A. (2017). Environmental ethical values in moral education. Paper presented at European Conference on Educational Research, Network 30, Session 08A, Copenhagen, Denmark, 22–25 August 2017.

  • Kvamme, O.A. (Forthcoming). Blurring the image of the other? The recontextualization of environmental ethical values in Norwegian education policy documents. In J. Ristiniemi, G. Skeie & K. Sporre (Eds.), ‘Life Questions’, existential issues, and worldviews in education. Münster: Waxmann.

  • MacIntyre, A. (1981). After virtue. A study in moral theory. London: Duckworth.

  • Miedema, S. (2017). Pedagogy is coming back! Some hopeful signs for sustainable general education and worldview education. Discourse and Communication for Sustainable Education, 8(1), 121–128, doi: 10.1515/dcse-2017-0009

  • Norwegian Directorate for Education and Training (2016). Curriculum for knowledge of Christianity, religion, philosophies of life and ethics. Retrieved from https://www.udir.no/kl06/RLE1-02?lplang=http://data.udir.no/kl06/eng

  • Öhman, J. (2006). Den etiska tendensen i utbildning för hållbar utveckling. Meningsskapande i ett genomlevandeperspektiv. [The ethical tendency in education for sustainable development. A practical understanding of meaning-making]. Örebro Studies in Education, 13, 1–143.

  • O’Grady, K., Miller, J., & McKenna, U. (2013). Robert Jackson and Warwick research. Religion & Education, 40 (1), 1–4.

  • Osbeck, C., & Skeie, G. (2014). Religious education at schools in Sweden. In M. Rothgangel, G. Skeie & M. Jäggle (Eds.), Religious education at schools in Europe. Part 3: Northern Europe (pp. 237–266). Göttingen: Vienna University Press.

  • Pigozzi, M.J. (2006). A UNESCO view of global citizenship education. Educational Review, 58 (1), 1–4.

  • Ricoeur, P. (2009). Hermeneutics and the human sciences. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

  • Sauvé, L. (1996). Environmental education and sustainable development: A further appraisal. Canadian Journal of Environmental Education, 1, 7–34.

  • Sayer, A. (2011). Why things matter to people: Social science, values and ethical life. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

  • Scott, W., & Oulton, C. (1998). Environmental values education: An exploration of its role in the school curriculum. Journal of Moral Education, 27(2), 209–224.

  • Sporre, K. (2015). In search of human dignity: essays in theology, ethics and education. Münster: Waxmann.

  • Sund, L., & Öhman, J. (2014). On the need to repoliticise environmental and sustainability education: Rethinking the postpolitical consensus. Environmental Education Research, 20(5), 639–659.

  • Taylor, C. (1989). Sources of the self: The making of modern identity. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

  • UNESCO (2004). The UNDESD international implementation scheme. Retrieved from http://unesdoc.unesco.org/images/0013/001399/139937e.pdf

  • UNESCO (2006). Framework for the DESD draft implementation scheme. Retrieved from http://unesdoc.unesco.org/images/0014/001486/148650E.pdf

  • UNESCO (2014). UNESCO Roadmap for Implementing the Global Action Programme on Education for Sustainable Development. Retrieved from https://sustainabledevelopment.un.org/content/documents/1674unescoroadmap.pdf

  • United Nations General Assembly (2002). Resolution 57/254: United Nations Decade of Education for Sustainable Development. Retrieved from http://www.un-documents.net/a57r254.htm

  • Vestøl, J.M. (2011). Moral education and the role of cultural tools. Journal of Moral Education, 40 (1), 37–50.

  • Våge, H.C., & Holte, S. (2016). Skyldig, jeg? [“Am I guilty?”]. P3 Documentary on carbon footprint. Broadcasted by Norwegian Broadcasting Corporation, 3 October 2016. Retrieved from https://p3.no/dokumentar/skyldig-jeg/

  • Wahlström, N. (2009). Understanding the universal right to education as jurisgenerative politics and democratic iterations. European Educational Research Journal, 8 (4), 520–533.

  • Young, I.M. (1990). Justice and the politics of difference. Princeton, N.J: Princeton University Press.

OPEN ACCESS

Journal + Issues

Search