Meeting the Challenges of ESD Competency – Based Curriculum in a Vocational School Setting

Dzintra Iliško 1 , Eridiana Oļehnoviča 1 , Inta Ostrovska 1 , Velga Akmene 1  and Ilga Salīte 1
  • 1 Daugavpils University, , Latvia


Sustainability is becoming an integral part of vocational schools since schools are called to respond to the environmental crises and unsustainability issues in the community as well as to an unsustainable economic development. Vocational schools have to play a significant role is re-orienting students’ frames of reference towards sustainability for a well-being of the Earth.

The aim of the article is to explore teachers’ views on their gains of integrating sustainability and the use of sustainability pedagogies as a result of participation in three years long international project. The article reflects on teachers’ efforts of reorienting the curriculum of a vocational school towards sustainability within the framework of the international Erasmus+ project “Methods for ESD – competencies and curricula” (MetESD), led by Vechta University.

If the inline PDF is not rendering correctly, you can download the PDF file here.

  • Agenda 21 of the Rio Earth Summit (1992). Retrieved from

  • Barth, M., & Rieckmann, M. (2012). Academic staff development as a catalyst for curriculum change towards education for sustainable development: an output perspective. Journal of Cleaner Production, 26, 28–36.

  • Blincoe, K. (2009). Re-educating the person, In A. Stibbe (ed.). The handbook of sustainability literacy. Dartington: Green Books.

  • Bonnett, M. (1999). Sustainability as a frame of mind and how to develop it. The Trumpeter Journal of Ecology, 18(1). Retrieved from

  • Briggs, J. (1992). Fractals the patterns of chaos. Applied Linguistics, 8(2), 141–165.

  • Briggs, J., & Peat, F. (1989). Turbulent mirror: An illustrated guide to chaos theory and the science of wholeness. New Nork: Harper and Row.

  • Cabrian, G., & Junyent, M. (2015). Competencies in education for sustainable development: Exploring the student teacher’s views. Sustainability, 7, 2768–2786.

  • Charteris, J. (2014). Epistemological shudders a productive aporia: A heuristic for transformative teacher learning. International Journal of Qualitative Methods, 104–121.

  • Cramer J., & Loeber, A. (2007). Learning about corporate social responsibility from a sustainable development perspective: A Duch experience. In Wals, A. E. (Ed.). Social learning towards sustainable world. Principles, perspectives and Paxis (pp. 265–275). Wageningen: Wageningen Academic Publishers.

  • Dlouha, J., Barton, A., Janouškova, S., & Dlouhy, J. (2013). Social learning indicators in sustainability-oriented regional learning networks. Journal of Cleaner Production, 49, 64–73.

  • EC (2017). Commission decision on setting up the multi-stakeholder platform on the implementation of the Sustainable Development Goals in the EU. Retrieved from

  • Fien, J., & Tilbury, D. (2002). The global challenge of sustainability. In Tilbury, D., Stevenson, R.B., Fien, J., & Schreuder, D. (Eds.). Education and sustainability: responding to the global challenge (pp. 1–12). Switzerland: Commission on Education and Communication.

  • Frisk, E., & Larson, K. (2011). Educating for sustainability: Competencies & practices for transformative action. Journal of Sustainability Education, 2, March, Retrieved from

  • Hegarty, K. (2008). Shaping the self to sustain the other, mapping impacts of academic identity in education for sustainability. Environmental Education Research, 14, 681–692.

  • Iliško, Dz. (2014). Envisioning the future: Bachelor’s and Master’s degree students’ perspectives. Journal of Teacher Education for Sustainability, 16(2), pp. 88–102. doi: 10.2478/jtes-2014-0013

  • Lansu, A., Boon, J., Sloep, P.B., & van Dam–Mieras, R., (2013). Changing professional demands in sustainable regional development: a curriculum design to meet trans-boundary competence. Journal of Cleaner Production, 49, 123–133.

  • Larsen-Freeman, D., & Cameron, L. (2008b). Complex systems and applied linguistics. Oxford: Oxford University Press

  • Murray, P., Douglas-Dunbar, A., & Murray, S. (2014). Evaluating value-centered pedagogies in education for sustainable development. International Journal of Sustainability in Higher Education, 15(3), 314–329.

  • Pace, P. (2005). Self-evaluation as a tool in developing environmental responsibility. Journal of Teacher Education for Sustainability, 12(1), 5–26.

  • Rieckmann, M. (2012). Future-oriented higher education: Which key competencies should be fostered through university teaching and learning. Futures, 44(2), 127–135.

  • Salīte, I., Drelinga, E., Iliško, Dz., Oļehnoviča, E., & Zariņa, S. (2016). Sustainability from the transdisciplinary perspective: An action research strategy for continuing education program development. Journal of Teacher Education for Sustainability, 18(2), 135–152. doi: 10.1515/jtes-2016-0020

  • Salīte, I. (2015). Searching for sustainability in teacher education and educational research: Experiences from the Baltic and Black Sea Circle Consortium for educational research. Discourse and Communication for Sustainable Education, 6, 21–29. doi: 10.1515/dcse-2015-0002

  • Singh, M. (2015). Global perspectives of recognizing non-formal and informal learning. Why recognition matters. Springer: UNESCO Institute for Lifelong Learning.

  • Somerville, M. (2007). Postmodern emergence International Journal of Qualitative Studies in Education, 20(2), 225–243.

  • The United Nations UNESCO-UNEP International Educational Program (1995). Retrieved from

  • The Talloires Declaration (1990). Retrieved from

  • The 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development. UN: 70/1, Retrieved from

  • UNESCO (2015). United Nations Decade of education for Sustainable Development (2005–2014). Draft International Implementation Scheme, UNESCO: Paris. Retrieved from

  • UNESCO-UNEP International Educational Program (1975). Retrieved from


Journal + Issues