Meeting the Challenges of ESD Competency – Based Curriculum in a Vocational School Setting

Open access


Sustainability is becoming an integral part of vocational schools since schools are called to respond to the environmental crises and unsustainability issues in the community as well as to an unsustainable economic development. Vocational schools have to play a significant role is re-orienting students’ frames of reference towards sustainability for a well-being of the Earth.

The aim of the article is to explore teachers’ views on their gains of integrating sustainability and the use of sustainability pedagogies as a result of participation in three years long international project. The article reflects on teachers’ efforts of reorienting the curriculum of a vocational school towards sustainability within the framework of the international Erasmus+ project “Methods for ESD – competencies and curricula” (MetESD), led by Vechta University.

If the inline PDF is not rendering correctly, you can download the PDF file here.

  • Agenda 21 of the Rio Earth Summit (1992). Retrieved from

  • Barth M. & Rieckmann M. (2012). Academic staff development as a catalyst for curriculum change towards education for sustainable development: an output perspective. Journal of Cleaner Production26 28–36.

  • Blincoe K. (2009). Re-educating the person In A. Stibbe (ed.). The handbook of sustainability literacy. Dartington: Green Books.

  • Bonnett M. (1999). Sustainability as a frame of mind and how to develop it. The Trumpeter Journal of Ecology18(1). Retrieved from

  • Briggs J. (1992). Fractals the patterns of chaos. Applied Linguistics 8(2) 141–165.

  • Briggs J. & Peat F. (1989). Turbulent mirror: An illustrated guide to chaos theory and the science of wholeness. New Nork: Harper and Row.

  • Cabrian G. & Junyent M. (2015). Competencies in education for sustainable development: Exploring the student teacher’s views. Sustainability 7 2768–2786.

  • Charteris J. (2014). Epistemological shudders a productive aporia: A heuristic for transformative teacher learning. International Journal of Qualitative Methods 104–121.

  • Cramer J. & Loeber A. (2007). Learning about corporate social responsibility from a sustainable development perspective: A Duch experience. In Wals A. E. (Ed.). Social learning towards sustainable world. Principles perspectives and Paxis (pp. 265–275). Wageningen: Wageningen Academic Publishers.

  • Dlouha J. Barton A. Janouškova S. & Dlouhy J. (2013). Social learning indicators in sustainability-oriented regional learning networks. Journal of Cleaner Production49 64–73.

  • EC (2017). Commission decision on setting up the multi-stakeholder platform on the implementation of the Sustainable Development Goals in the EU. Retrieved from

  • Fien J. & Tilbury D. (2002). The global challenge of sustainability. In Tilbury D. Stevenson R.B. Fien J. & Schreuder D. (Eds.). Education and sustainability: responding to the global challenge (pp. 1–12). Switzerland: Commission on Education and Communication.

  • Frisk E. & Larson K. (2011). Educating for sustainability: Competencies & practices for transformative action. Journal of Sustainability Education 2 March Retrieved from

  • Hegarty K. (2008). Shaping the self to sustain the other mapping impacts of academic identity in education for sustainability. Environmental Education Research14 681–692.

  • Iliško Dz. (2014). Envisioning the future: Bachelor’s and Master’s degree students’ perspectives. Journal of Teacher Education for Sustainability16(2) pp. 88–102. doi: 10.2478/jtes-2014-0013

  • Lansu A. Boon J. Sloep P.B. & van Dam–Mieras R. (2013). Changing professional demands in sustainable regional development: a curriculum design to meet trans-boundary competence. Journal of Cleaner Production49 123–133.

  • Larsen-Freeman D. & Cameron L. (2008b). Complex systems and applied linguistics. Oxford: Oxford University Press

  • Murray P. Douglas-Dunbar A. & Murray S. (2014). Evaluating value-centered pedagogies in education for sustainable development. International Journal of Sustainability in Higher Education15(3) 314–329.

  • Pace P. (2005). Self-evaluation as a tool in developing environmental responsibility. Journal of Teacher Education for Sustainability12(1) 5–26.

  • Rieckmann M. (2012). Future-oriented higher education: Which key competencies should be fostered through university teaching and learning. Futures44(2) 127–135.

  • Salīte I. Drelinga E. Iliško Dz. Oļehnoviča E. & Zariņa S. (2016). Sustainability from the transdisciplinary perspective: An action research strategy for continuing education program development. Journal of Teacher Education for Sustainability18(2) 135–152. doi: 10.1515/jtes-2016-0020

  • Salīte I. (2015). Searching for sustainability in teacher education and educational research: Experiences from the Baltic and Black Sea Circle Consortium for educational research. Discourse and Communication for Sustainable Education6 21–29. doi: 10.1515/dcse-2015-0002

  • Singh M. (2015). Global perspectives of recognizing non-formal and informal learning. Why recognition matters. Springer: UNESCO Institute for Lifelong Learning.

  • Somerville M. (2007). Postmodern emergence International Journal of Qualitative Studies in Education 20(2) 225–243.

  • The United Nations UNESCO-UNEP International Educational Program (1995). Retrieved from

  • The Talloires Declaration (1990). Retrieved from

  • The 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development. UN: 70/1 Retrieved from

  • UNESCO (2015). United Nations Decade of education for Sustainable Development (2005–2014). Draft International Implementation Scheme UNESCO: Paris. Retrieved from

  • UNESCO-UNEP International Educational Program (1975). Retrieved from

Journal information
Cited By
All Time Past Year Past 30 Days
Abstract Views 0 0 0
Full Text Views 473 115 5
PDF Downloads 236 83 2