Exploring the Role of Future Perspective in Predicting Turkish University Students’ Beliefs About Global Climate Change

Open access


Recent studies indicate that limited understanding about causes and its potential impacts of climate change and fault beliefs by people across different countries of the world including Turkey is a real challenge. Acceptance of climate change as a real threat, believing its existence, and knowing causes and consequences are very significant for climate change adaptation and mitigation. Therefore, exploring underlying factors shaping or affecting beliefs of people is needed for designing educational interventions for a change in individuals’ attitudes and behaviours. The main purpose of the present study was to explore how and to what extent future time perspective, perceived knowledge about global climate change, and environmental attitudes explain the university students’ beliefs about occurrence, causes and consequences of GCC. A quantitative research was conducted with the participation of one thousand, five hundred and eighty undergraduate students (n=1580) of METU and the data was gathered through Future Perspective Related Beliefs about Global Climate Change Scale. The study findings suggested that ecocentric attitude and perceived knowledge are mainly two influential factors for the undergraduate students’ beliefs about global climate change. Future time perspective’s contribution although low, was found to be significant in beliefs about GCC. The results of this study would shed light to evaluate and improve educational programs and curriculum in higher education, and can be a guide because Turkish literature does not serve any research that seek students’ future time perspective related to global climate change.

If the inline PDF is not rendering correctly, you can download the PDF file here.

  • Arnocky S. Milfont T.L. & Nicol J.R. (2014). Time perspective and sustainable behavior: Evidence for the distinction between consideration of immediate and future consequences. Environment and Behavior 46(5) 556–582. doi: 10.1177/0013916512474987.

  • Bakutytė R. Ušeckienė L. & Iliško Dz. (2016). The development of implementation of learner – centered assessment in pedagogical requalification studies. Social Welfare Interdisciplinary Approach 56–62. doi: 10.21277/sw.v2i6.264.

  • Balliet D. & Ferris D.L. (2013). Ostracism and prosocial behavior: A social dilemma perspective. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes 120(2) 298–308. doi:10.1016/j.obhdp.2012.04.004.

  • Beck L. & Cable T.T. (2011). The gifts of interpretation: Fifteen guiding principles for interpreting nature and culture. Urbana: Sagamore.

  • Beckenkamp M. (2011). The social dilemma of climate change: Socio-economic implications. In W.L. Filho (Ed.) The economic social and political elements of climate change (pp.143-152). Berlin: Springer-Verlag. doi: 10.1007/978-3-642-14776-0_10.

  • Besong F. & Holland C. (2015). The dispositions abilities and behaviours (DAB) framework for profiling learners’ sustainability competencies in higher education. Journal of Teacher Education for Sustainability 17(1) 5–22. doi: 10.1515/jtes-2015-0001.

  • Bord R. J. & O’Connor R. E. (1997). The gender gap in environmental attitudes: The case of perceived vulnerability to risk. Social Science Quarterly 78(4) 830e840.

  • Bord R.J. O’Connor R.E. & Fisher A. (2000). In what sense does the public need to understand global climate change? Public Understanding of Science 9(3) 205–217. doi: 10.1088/0963-6625/9/3/301.

  • Bozdogan A.E. (2009). Bir küresel ısınma tutum ölcegi gelistirilmesi [Developing a scale of attitudes about global warming]. EÜFBED-Fen Bilimleri Enstitüsü Dergisi [Erzincan University Journal of Science and Technology] 2(1) 35–50.

  • Brody S.D. Zahran S. Vedlitz A. & Grover H. (2008). Examining the relationship between physical vulnerability and public perceptions of global climate change in the United States. Environment and Behavior 40(1) 72–95. doi: 10.1177/0013916506298800.

  • Buckler C. & Creech H. (2014). Shaping the future we want: UN decade of education for sustainable development (2005–2014) final report. Paris: UNESCO. Retrieved from http://www.unesco.org/open-access/terms-use-ccbysa-en

  • Carmi N. (2013). Caring about tomorrow: Future orientation environmental attitudes and behaviors. Environmental Education Research 19(4) 430-444. doi: 10.1080/13504622.2012.700697.

  • Carmi N. & Arnon S. (2014). The role of future orientation in environmental behavior: Analyzing the relationship on the individual and cultural levels. Society and Natural Resources: An International Journal 27(12) 1304–1320. doi:10.1080/08941920.2014.928393.

  • Chew-Hung C. (2014). Climate change education: Knowing doing and being. London New York: Taylor and Francis Routledge.

  • Cinan S. & Doğan A. (2013). Working memory mental prospection time orientation and cognitive insight. Journal of Individual Differences 34(3) 159–169. doi: 10.1027/1614-0001/a000111.

  • Corner A. Venables D. Spence A. Poortinga W. Demski C. & Pidgeon N.F. (2011). Nuclear power climate change and energy security: exploring British public attitudes. Energy Policy 39 4823-4833. doi: 10.1016/j.enpol.2011.06.037.

  • Corral-Verdugo V. Fraijo-Sing B. & Pinheiro Q. (2006). Sustainable behavior and time perspective: Present past and future orientations and their relationship with water conservation behavior. InterAmerican Journal of Psychology 40(2) 139–147.

  • Corral-Verdugo V. Bonnes M. Tapia-Fonllem C. Fraijo-Sing B. Frias-Armenta M. & Carrus G. (2009). Correlates of pro-sustainability orientation: The affinity towards diversity. Journal of Environmental Psychology 29 34–43. doi: 10.1016/j.jenvp.2008.09.001.

  • Dietz S. & Stern N. (1998). Science values and biodiversity. BioScience 48(6) 441–444.

  • Eryigit A. (2010). A cross-age study on elementary students’ value orientations environmental optimism and environmental concern (Unpublished Master Thesis). Middle East Technical University Ankara.

  • Eurobarometer (2014). Special report on climate change. Brussels: European Commission Directorate-General for Climate Action. Retrieved from http://ec.europa.eu/public_opinion/archives/ebs/ebs_409_en.pdf

  • Frisk E. & Larson K. (2011). Educating for sustainability: Competencies and practices for transformative action. Journal for Sustainability Education 2. Retrieved from www.journalofsustainabilityeducation.org/wordpress/content/educating-for-sustainability-competencies-practices-for-trans

  • Gailly A.F. (1982). Cross-cultural differences in socialization: A comparison between Turks in Turkey Turkish migrant in Belgium abd Belgian adolescents with special reference to their motivational content and future time perspective. (Unpublished Doctoral dissertation). Catholic University of Louvain Leuven Belgium.

  • Gallup (2013). Gallup Poll social series: Environment and climate change. Retrieved from http://www.gallup.com/poll/161645/americans-concerns-global-warmingrise.aspx

  • Gibson R. (2006). Beyond the pillars: Sustainability assessment as a framework for effective integration of social economic and ecological considerations in significant decision-making. Journal of Environmental Assessment Policy and Management 8(3) 259–280.

  • Gifford R. (2011). The dragons of inaction: Psychological barriers that limit climate change mitigation and adaption. American Psychological Association 66(4) 290–302. doi: 10.1037/a0023566.

  • Gifford R. Kormos C. & McIntyre A. (2011). Behavioral dimensions of climate change: drivers responses barriers and interventions. Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews: Climate Change 2(6) 801–827. doi: 10.1002/wcc.143.

  • Gray R. (2010). Is accounting for sustainability actually accounting for sustainability and how would we know? An exploration of narratives of organizations and the planet. Accounting Organizations and Society 35(1) 47-62. doi: 10.1016/j.aos.2009.04.006.

  • Grotzer T. & Lincoln R. (2007). Educating for intelligent environmental action in an age of global warming. In S.C. Moser & L. Dilling (Eds.). Creating a climate for change communicating climate change and facilitating social change (pp. 266–280). Cambridge: Cambridge University.

  • Heath Y. & Gifford R. (2006). Free-market ideology and environmental degradation: The case of belief in global climate change. Environment and Behavior 38(1) 48–71. doi: 10.1177/0013916505277998.

  • Heimlich J.E. & Ardoin N.M. (2008). Understanding behavior to understand behavior change: a literature review. Environmental Education Research 14(3) 215–237. doi:10.1080/13504620802148881.

  • Hidalgo M.C. & Pisano I. (2010). Determinants of risk perception and willingness to tackle climate change. A pilot study. Psychology 1(1) 105–112.

  • Hulme M. (2009). Why we disagree about climate change. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

  • Iliško Dz. Skrinda A. & Mičule I. (2014). Envisioning the future: Bachelor’s and Masters’ degree students’ perspectives. Journal of Teacher Education for Sustainability 16(2) 88-102.

  • Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change [IPCC]. (2001). Climate change 2001: Synthesis report: Summary for policymakers. Contribution of working group II to the third assessment. Retrieved from http://www.ipcc.ch/pdf/climate-changes-2001/synthesis-spm/synthesis-spm-en.pdf

  • Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change [IPCC]. (2007). Climate change 2007: Impacts adaptation and vulnerability. Summary for policymakers. Contribution of working group II to the fourth assessment. Retrieved from www.ipcc-wg2.org/index.html

  • Ipsos MORI (2014). Global trends report 2014. Retrieved from www.ipsosglobaltrends.com/environment.html

  • Kabasakal H. & Dastmalchian A. (2001). Introduction to the special issue on leadership and culture in the Middle East. Applied Psychology: An International Review 50(4) 479–488.

  • Kagawa F. & Selby D. (Eds) (2010). Education and climate change: Living and learning in interesting times. New York: Routledge.

  • Kahraman S. Yalçı n M. Özkan E. & Aggül F. (2008). Sınıf ogretmenligi ogrencilerinin kuresel isinma konusundaki farkindaliklari ve bilgi duzeyleri [Pre-service elementary school teachers’ awareness and knowledge about global climate change]. Gazi Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi [Gazi University Journal of Gazi Educational Faculty] 28(3) 249–263.

  • Keinonen T. Palmberg I. Kukkonen J. Yli-Panula E. Persson C. & Vilkonis R. (2016). Higher education students’ perceptions of environmental issues and media coverage. Discourse and Communication for Sustainable Education 7(1) 5–22. doi: 10.1515/dcse-2016-0001.

  • Kılınç A. Boyes E. & Stanisstreet M. (2011). Turkish school students and global warming: beliefs and willingness to act. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics Science & Technology Education 7(2) 121–134.

  • Komorita S.S. & Parks C.D. (1994). Social dilemmas. Boulder: Westview Press.

  • Leiserowitz A. (2005). American risk perceptions: Is climate change dangerous? Risk Analysis 25(6) 1433–1442.

  • Leiserowitz A. Maibach E. Roser-Renouf C. & Hmielowski J. (2012) Global warming’s six Americas March 2012 & Nov. 2011. Yale University and George Mason University. New Haven CT: Yale Project on Climate Change Communication. Retrieved from http://environment.yale.edu/climate/files/Six-Americas-March-2012.pdf

  • Liberman N. & Trope Y. (2008). The psychology of transcending the here and now. Science 322 1201–1205.

  • Lorenzoni L. Nicholson-Cole S. & Whitmarsh L. (2007). Barriers perceived to engaging with climate change among the UK public and their policy implications. Global Environmental Change 17(3–4) 445–459. doi: 10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2007.01.004.

  • Maibach E.W. Leiserowitz A. Roser-Renouf C. & Mertz C.K. (2011). Identifying like-minded audiences for global warming public engagement campaigns: An audience segmentation analysis and tool development. PLoS ONE 6(3) e17571. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0017571.

  • Makrakis V. Gkotzos D. & Larios N. (2013). ICT-enabled climate change education and children rights. Journal of Teacher Education for Sustainability 14(2) 89–110. doi: 10.2478/v10099-012-0011-y.

  • Malka A. Krosnick J.A. & Langer G. (2009). The association of knowledge with concern about global warming: Trusted information sources shape public thinking. Risk Analysis 29(5) 633-647. doi: 10.1111/j.1539-6924.2009.01220.x.

  • McCright A. M. (2010). The effects of gender on climate change knowledge and concern in the American public. Population and Environment 32(1) 66e87.

  • McCright A.M. Dunlap R.E. & Xiao C. (2013). Perceived scientific agreement and support for government action on climate change in the USA. Climatic Change 119 511–518.

  • Meier T. & Christen O. (2012). Gender as a factor in an environmental assessment of the consumption of animal and plant-based foods in Germany. The International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment 17(5) 550e564.

  • Messick D. M. & McClelland C. L. (1983). Social traps and temporal traps. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin 9(1) 105–110. doi:10.1177/0146167283091015.

  • Milfont T.L. (2010). The psychological meaning of preservation and utilization attitudes: A study using the natural semantic network technique. Psycology 1 123–136.

  • Milfont T.L. (2012). The interplay between knowledge perceived efficacy and concern about global warming and climate change: A one-year longitudinal study. Risk Analysis 32 1003–1020.

  • Milfont T.L. & Demarque C. (2015). Understanding environmental issues with temporal lenses: Issues of temporality and individual differences. In M. Stolarski N. Fieulaine & W. van Beek (Eds.) Time perspective theory; review research & application: Essays in honor of Philip G. Zimbardo (pp. 371–383). New York: Springer. doi: 10.1007/978-3-319-07368-2_24.

  • Milfont T.L. & Duckitt J. (2010). The environmental attitudes inventory: A valid and reliable measure to assess the structure of environmental attitudes. Journal of Environmental Psychology 30 80–94.

  • Milfont T.L. Abrahamse W. & McCarthy N. (2011). Spatial and temporal biases in assessments of environmental conditions in New Zealand. New Zealand Journal of Psychology 40 56–67.

  • Milfont T.L. & Gouveia V. V. (2006). Time perspective and values: An exploratory study of their relations to environmental attitudes. Journal of Environmental Psychology 26(1) 72–82. doi: 10.1016/j.jenvp.2006.03.001.

  • Milfont T.L. Wilson J. & Diniz P. (2012). Time perspective and environmental engagement: A meta-analysis. International Journal of Psychology 47(5) 325–334. doi: 10.1080/00207594.2011.647029.

  • Ministry of Environment and Urbanization (2012). İklim değişikliğinin farkında mıyız? [Are we aware of climate change?]. Ankara: Ministry of Environment and Urbanization.

  • Nilsson A. von Borgstede C & Biel A. (2004). Willingness to accept climate change strategies: the effect of values and norms. Journal of Environmental Psychology 24 267–277.

  • Nolet V. (2009). Preparing sustainability-literate teachers. Teachers College Record 111(2) 409–442.

  • O’Connor R.E. Bord R.J. & Fisher A. (1999). Risk perceptions general environmental beliefs and willingness to address climate change. Risk Analysis 79 461–471.

  • Ozdem Y. Dal B. Ozturk N. Sonmez D. & Alper U. (2014). What is that thing called climate change? An investigation into the understanding of climate change by seventh-grade students. International Research in Geographical and Environmental Education 23(4) 294–313. doi: 10.1080/10382046.2014.946323.

  • Park H.S. & Vedlitz A. (2013). Climate hazards and risk status: Explaining climate risk assessment behavior and policy support. Sociological Spectrum 33(3) 219e239.

  • Petrocelli J.V. (2003). Factor validation of the consideration of future consequences scale: Evidence for a short version. The Journal of Social Psychology 143(4) 405–413.

  • Pike C. Doppelt B. & Herr M. (2010). Climate communications and behavior change: A guide for practitioners. Oregon: The Climate Leadership Initiative. Retrieved from www.climateaccess.org/sites/default/files/Climate%20Communications%20and%20Behavior%20Change.pdf

  • Pipere A. Veisson M. & Salīte I. (2015). Developing research in teacher education for sustainability: UN DESD via the Journal of Teacher Education for Sustainability. Journal of Teacher Education for Sustainability 17(2) 5–43 doi: 10.1515/jtes-2015-0009.

  • Poortinga W. Spence A. Whitmarsh L. Capstick S. & Pidgeon N. (2011). Uncertain climate: an investigation into public scepticism about anthropogenic climate change. Global Environmental Change 21 1015–1024. doi: 10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2011.03.001.

  • Powell R.B. & Ham S.H. (2008). Can ecotourism interpretation really lead to proconservation knowledge attitudes and behavior? Evidence from the Galapagos Islands. Journal of Sustainable Tourism 16 467–89.

  • Pruneau D. Kerry J. Freiman V. Langis J. & Bizid M. (2016). Perceived affordances tensions and complementarities in the physical and digital environments frequented by future teachers. Discourse and Communication for Sustainable Education 7(1) 68–81. doi: 10.1515/dcse-2016-0005.

  • Rabinovich A. Morton T. & Postmes T. (2010). Time perspective and attitude-behavior consistency in future-oriented behaviors. British Journal of Social Psychology 49(1) 69–89. doi: 10.1348/014466608X401875.

  • Reser J.P. Bradley G.L. Glendon A. I. Ellul M.C. & Callaghan R. (2012). Public risk perceptions understandings and responses to climate change and natural disasters in Australia and Great Britain Gold Coast: National Climate Change Adaptation Research Facility.

  • Sahin E. (2013). Predictors of Turkish elementary teacher candidates’ energy conservation behaviors: An approach on value-belief-norm theory. International Journal of Environmental and Science Education 8(2) 269–283. doi: 10.12973/ijese.2013.204a.

  • Sahin E. Ertepinar H. & Teksoz G. (2012). University students’ behaviors pertaining to sustainability: A structural equation model with sustainability-related attributes. International Journal of Environmental and Science Education 7(3) 459–478.

  • Salīte I. (2015). Searching for sustainability in teacher education and educational research: Experiences from the Baltic and Black Sea Circle Consortium for educational research. Discourse and Communication for Sustainable Education 6 21–29.

  • Scannell L. & Gifford R. (2013). Personally relevant climate change: The role of place attachment and local versus global message framing in engagement. Environment and Behavior 45(1) 60–85.

  • Schultz P.W. Shriver C. Tabanico J.J. & Khazian A.M. (2004). Implicit connections with nature. Journal of Environmental Psychology 24(1) 31–42. doi: 10.1016/S0272-4944(03)00022-7.

  • Semenza J.C. Hall D.E. Wilson D.J. Bontempo B.D. Sailor D.J. & George L.A. (2008). Public perception of climate change: Voluntary mitigation and barriers to behavior change. American Journal of Preventive Medicine 35(5) 479–487. doi: 10.1016/j.amepre.2008.08.020.

  • Senel H. & Gungor B. (2009). Universite ögrencilerinin küresel isinma hakkindaki bilgilerinin ve kavram yanilgilarinin tespiti [Exploring university students’ misconceptions and knowledge about global warming]. E-Journal of New World Sciences Academy 4(4) 1207–1225. Retrieved from: http://dergipark.ulakbim.gov.tr/nwsaedu/article/download/5000063529/pdf_140.

  • Sever D. (2013). Türkiye ve İngiltere’deki fen bilimleri alanında ögrenim gören ögretmen adaylarinin küresel isinmaya yönelik düsünceleri [Views of prospective science teachers in Turkey and UK about global warming]. Ilköğretim Online [Elementary Education Online] 12(4) 1212-1221.

  • Shao W. (2012). Understanding public perceptions of global warming. Unpublished Doctoral Thesis. Louisiana State University.

  • Sircova A. van de Vijver F. J. R. Osin E. Milfont T. L. Fieulaine N. Kislali-Erginbilgic A. & Zimbardo P. G. (2015). Time perspective profiles of cultures. In M. Stolarski N. Fieulaine & W. van Beek (Eds.) Time perspective theory; review research and application: Essays in honor of Philip G. Zimbardo (pp. 169–187). New York: Springer. doi: 10.1007/978-3-319-07368-2.

  • Spence A. Poortinga W. & Pidgeon N. (2012). The psychological distance of climate change. Risk Analysis 32(6) 957–972. doi: 10.1111/j.1539-6924.2011.01695.x.

  • Sterling S. (2004). Sustainable education: Re-visioning learning and change. Bristol: Schumacher Briefing Green Books.

  • Strathman A. Gleicher F. Boninger D.S. & Edwards C.S. (1994). The Consideration of future consequences: Weighing immediate and distant outcomes of behavior. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 66(4) 742–752.

  • Sundblad E.L. Biel A. & Gärling T. (2008). Knowledge and confidence in knowledge about climate change among experts journalists politicians and laypersons. Environment and Behavior 41(2) 281–302. doi: 10.1177/0013916508314998.

  • Swim J. Clayton S. Doherty T. Gifford R. Howard G. Reser J. Stern P. & Weber E. (2009). Psychology and global climate change: Addressing a multi-faceted phenomenon and set of challenges. A report by the American Psychological Association’s task force on the interface between psychology and global climate change. Retrieved from: www.apa.org/science/about/publications/climate-change.aspx

  • Thompson S. C. & Barton M.A. (1994). Ecocentric and anthropocentric attitudes toward the environment. Journal of Environmental Psychology 14(2) 149–157. doi: 10.1016/S0272-4944(05)80168-9.

  • Trope Y.L. Liberman N. & Wakslak C. (2007). Construal levels and psychological distance: Effects on representation prediction evaluation and behavior. Journal of Consumer Psychology 17(2) 83-95. doi:10.1016/S1057-7408(07)70013-X.

  • Trope Y. L. & Liberman N. (2010). Construal-level theory of psychological distance. Psychological Review 117(2) 440-463. doi:10.1037/a0018963.

  • Tuncer (2008). University students’ perception on sustainable development: A case study from Turkey. International Research in Geographical and Environmental Education 17(3) 212-226. doi: 10.1080/10382040802168297.

  • Tuncer G. Ertepinar H. Tekkaya C. & Sungur S. (2005). Environmental attitudes of young people in Turkey: effects of school type and gender. Environmental Education Research 11(2) 215-233.doi: 10.1080/1350462042000338379.

  • UNESCO (2014). Roadmap for implementing the global action programme on education for sustainable development. Paris France: UNESCO. Retrieved from http://unesdoc.unesco.org/images/0023/002305/230514e.pdf

  • van der Linden S. (2014). On the relationship between personal experience affect and risk perception: The case of climate change. European Journal of Social Psychology44 430–440. doi: 10.1002/ejsp.2008.

  • Wade-Benzoni K.A. Hernandez M. Medvec V. & Messick D. (2008). In fairness to future generations: The role of egocentrism uncertainty power and stewardship in judgments of intergenerational allocations. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology 44 233–245.

  • Whitmarsh L. (2009a). Behavioural responses to climate change: Asymmetry of intentions and impacts. Journal of Environmental Psychology 29(1) 13–23. doi:10.1016/j.jenvp.2008.05.003.

  • Whitmarsh L. (2009b). What’s in a name? Commonalities and differences in public understanding of “global warming” and “climate change”. Public Understanding of Science 18 401–420. doi: 10.1177/0963662506073088.

  • Whitmarsh L. (2011). Scepticism and uncertainty about climate change: dimensions determinants and change over time. Global Environmental Change 21 690–700.

  • Wiek A. Withycombe L. & Redman C.L. (2011). Key competencies in sustainability: A reference framework for academic program development. Sustainability Science 6 203–218.

  • Yılmaz O. Boone W. J. & Anderson H. O. (2004). Views of elementary and middle school Turkish students toward environmental issues. International Journal of Science Education 26(12) 1527–1546.

  • Zelezny L.C. & Chua P.P. & Aldrich C. (2000). Elaborating on gender differences in environmentalism. Journal of Social Issues 56 443–457.

  • Zimbardo P.G. & Boyd J.N. (1999). Putting time in perspective: A valid reliable individual-differences metric. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 77 1271–1288.

  • Zimbardo P.G. Keough K.A. & Boyd J.N. (1997). Present time perspective as a predictor of risky driving. Personality and Individual Differences 23(6) 1007–1023. doi: 10.1016/S0191-8869(97)00113-X.

  • Zimmerman M.R.K. (2011). The consensus on the consensus: An opinion survey of earth scientists on global climate change. Chicago: The Hearthland Institute.

Journal information
All Time Past Year Past 30 Days
Abstract Views 0 0 0
Full Text Views 357 115 8
PDF Downloads 170 73 1