Higher Education Students’ Perceptions of Environmental Issues and Media Coverage

Open access


This study aims to find higher education students’ perceptions about environmental issues and how the perceptions are related to perceptions of media coverage. This study investigates higher education students’ perceptions of the seriousness of environmental issues and their relation to perceptions of media coverage. Higher education students perceived a global problem, lack of clean water, as most serious environmental problem. Media has had an effect on students’ perceptions on environmental issues: when students perceived the problem as serious they also perceived the information in media concerning it appropriate. Students perceived that the media underestimate and obscure some environmental problems such as biological diversity and global warming. It was concluded that higher education educators need more knowledge of students’, future decision makers’ concerns and perceptions about environmental issues to develop more effective teaching practices in higher education. Through education environmental issues literacy, which is a precursor for engaged protection of the environment, can be fostered. This study offers some insights into higher education students’ perceptions of the media’s role in environmental issues.

If the inline PDF is not rendering correctly, you can download the PDF file here.

  • Andersson B. & Wallin A. (2000). Students’ understanding of the greenhouse effect the societal consequences of reducing CO2 emissions and the problem of ozone layer depletion. Journal of Research in Science Teaching 37(10) 1096–1111.

  • Antilla L. (2005). Climate of scepticism: US newspaper coverage of the science of climate change. Global Environmental Change 15 338–352.

  • Bogner F.X. & Wilhelm M.G. (1996). Environmental perspectives of pupils: The development of an attitude and behaviour scale. The Environmentalist 16 95–110.

  • Bogner F.X. & Wiseman M. (2002). Environmental perception: Factor profiles of extreme groups. European Psychologist 7 225–237.

  • Boykoff M. T. (2009). We speak for the trees: Media reporting on the environment. Annual Review of Environment and Resources 34 431–57.

  • Boykoff M. T. & Boykoff J. M. (2007). Climate change and journalistic norms: A case study of US mass-media coverage. Geoforum 38 1190–1204.

  • Campbell Bradley J. Waliczek T.M. & Zajicek J.M. (1999). Relationship between environmental knowledge and environmental attitude of High school students. The Journal of Environmental Education 30(3) 17–21.

  • Dispensa J. M. & Brulle R. J. (2003). Media’s social construction of environmental issues: Focus on global warming—a comparative study. International Journal of Sociology and Social Policy 23(10) 74–105.

  • Dunlap R.E. & Van Liere K.D. (1978). The “new environmental paradigm”: A proposed measuring instrument and preliminary results. Journal of Environmental Education 9 10–19.

  • Esa N. (2009). Environmental knowledge attitude and practices of student teachers. International Research in Geographical and Environmental Education 19(1) 39–50.

  • Feldman L. Nisbet M. Leiserowitz & Mailbach E. (2010). The climate generation? Survey analysis of the perceptions and beliefs of young Americans. Yale Project on Climate Change and Center for Climate Change Communication. Yale University and George Mason University.

  • Frank A. K. (2014). Writing about sustainability science for the media: How to be both true-to-fact and tell a good story. Applied Environmental Education & Communication 13(3) 203–211.

  • Freedman E. (2011). Environmental journalism in Kyrgyzstan and Kazakhstan: Reporting scarce amid environmental and media problems. Applied Environmental Education & Communication 10(2) 126–134.

  • Gavin N. T. (2011). Addressing climate change: a media perspective. Environmental Politics 18(5) 765–780.

  • Gooch G. D. (1995). The Baltic press and the environment: A study of the coverage of environmental problems in Estonian and Latvian newspapers 1992–1993. Geoforum 26(4) 429–443.

  • Holbert R. L. Kwak N. & Shah D.V. (2003). Environmental concern patterns of television viewing and pro-environmental behaviors: Integrating models of media consumption and effects. Journal of Broadcasting & Electronic Media 47(2) 177–196.

  • Iliško D. Skrinda A. & Mičule I. (2014). Envisioning the future: Bachelor’s and Master’s degree students’ perspectives. Journal of Teacher Education for Sustainability16(2) 88–102.

  • Johnson B. & Manoli C.C. (2011). The 2-MEV Scale in the United States: A Measure of Children’s Environmental Attitudes Based on the Theory of Ecological Attitude. The Journal of Environmental Education 42(2) 84–97.

  • Keinonen T. Yli-Panula E. Svens M. Vilkonis R. Persson C. & Palmberg I. (2014). Environmental issues in media—students’ perceptions in three Nordic-Baltic countries. Journal of Teacher Education for Sustainability 16(1) 32–53.

  • Kellstedt P. M. Zahran S. & Vedlitz A. (2008). Personal efficacy the information environment and attitudes toward global warming and climate change in the United States. Risk Analysis 28(1) 113–126.

  • Kukkonen J. Kärkkäinen S. & Keinonen T. (2012). University students’ information sources of education for sustainable development issues and their perceptions of environmental problems. Problems of Education in the 21st Century 39 94–105.

  • Lyytimäki J. (2011). Mainstreaming climate policy: The role of media coverage in Finland. Mitigation and Adaptation Strategies for Global Change 16(6) 649–661.

  • Lyytimäki J. & Tapio P. (2009). Climate change as reported in the press of Finland: From screaming headlines to penetrating background noise. International Journal of Environmental Studies 66(6) 723–735.

  • Petersen L. K. (2007). Changing public discourse on the environment: Danish media coverage of the Rio and Johannesburg UN summits. Environmental Politics 16(2) 206–230.

  • Riffe D. & Hrach T. (2009). Study explores audience’s views on environmental news. Newspaper Research Journal 30(3) 8–25.

  • Riffe D. Lacy S. & Reimold D. (2007). Papers lead TV in covering complex environmental issues. Newspaper Research Journal 28 77–87.

  • Salīte I. & Klepere R. (2003). Biotism as a ground for the education of refection in teacher education. Journal of Teacher Education and Training 3 44–58.

  • Sarrina Li S. C. (2014). Fear appeals and college students’ attitudes and behavioral intentions toward global warming. The Journal of Environmental Education45(4) 243–257.

  • Schultz P. W. (2000). Empathizing with nature: The effects of perspective taking on concern for environmental issues. Journal of Social Issues 56(3) 391–406.

  • Shanahan J. Morgan M. & Stenbjerre M. (1997). Green or brown? Television and the cultivation of environmental concern. Journal of Broadcasting & Electronic Media 41(3) 305–323.

  • Skamp K. Boyes E. & Stanisstreet M. (2004). Students’ ideas and attitudes about air quality. Research in Science Education 34(3) 313–342.

  • Smith N. & Joffe H. (2012). How the public engages with global warming: A social representations approach. Public Understanding of Science 22(1) 16–32.

  • Speck D.L. (2010). A hot topic? Climate change mitigation policies politics and the media in Australia. Human Ecology Review 17(2) 125–133.

  • TNS Opinion & Social. (2011). Special Eurobarometer 365. Attitudes of European citizens towards the environment. Retrieved March 3 2013 from http://ec.europa.eu/public_opinion/index_en.htm

  • Young N. & Dugas E. (2011). Representations of climate change in Canadian national print media: The banalization of global warming. Canadian Review of Sociology 48(1) 1–22.

  • Wachholz S. Artz N. & Chene D. (2012). Warming to the idea: University students’ knowledge and attitudes about climate change. International Journal of Sustainability in Higher Education 15(2) 128–141.

Journal information
Cited By
All Time Past Year Past 30 Days
Abstract Views 0 0 0
Full Text Views 1744 1250 58
PDF Downloads 1629 1041 118