Development of Corporate Governance Performance Indicators for Czech Manufacturing Companies

Open access


Effective corporate governance is a key element in achieving long-term success for any company. The codes of conduct that corporate governance adopts directly determine the sustainability of business activities. With this in mind, this paper aims to demonstrate the results of research that identifies a set of key indicators of corporate governance performance. The presented research is quantitative. In order to identify key performance indicators, factor analysis was employed. It was found that corporate governance performance is influenced by two factors. For the first factor, the relationship between corporate governance and stakeholders is measured by key indicators: percentage of women within CG, contributions to political parties, politicians and related institutions and number of complaints received from stakeholders. The second factor, strategy & compliance, is generated from the following: percentage of strategic objectives met and total number of sanctions for breaching the law. This research aims to assist both academic and corporate practitioners who want to improve corporate governance performance and, through the use of key performance indicators, support the transparency and sustainability of their business.

If the inline PDF is not rendering correctly, you can download the PDF file here.

  • Ayuso S. Argandona A. (2007). Responsible corporate governance: Towards a stakeholder board of directors? IESE Business School Working Paper No. 701. Retrieved June 8 2014 from

  • Clark V.L. (2004). SAS/STAT 9.1: User’s guide. SAS Institute.

  • Committee on the Financial Aspects of Corporate Governance. (1992). Committee on the Financial Aspects of Corporate Governance Report with Code of Best Practice. (Cadbury Report). London: Gee Publishing.Retrieved September 10 2014 from

  • Cranfield School of Management. (2009). Sustainable Value EABIS Research Project: Corporate Responsibility Market Valuation and Measuring the Financial and Non-Financial Performance of theFirm.Retrieved June 17 2014 from

  • Demb A. Neubauer F. F. (1992). The Corporate Board: Confronting the Paradoxes. New York: Oxford University Press.

  • Donaldson L. Davis J. H. (1991). Stewardship Theory or Agency Theory: CEO Governance and Shareholder Returns. Australian Journal of Management 16(1) 49-64.

  • DVFA. (2007). Key Performance Indicators (KPIs) for Extra-/Non-Financial Reporting. Retrieved June 17 2014 from

  • European Commission. (2011). Green paper: the EU corporate governance framework. Retrieved September 10 2014 from

  • Gompers P. A. Ishii J. L. Metrick A. (2001). Corporate governance and equity prices. National bureau of economic research.Retrieved September 10 2014 from

  • Heracleous L. (2001). What is the impact of corporate governance on organisational performance? Corporate Governance: An International Review 9(3) 165-173.

  • Hrebícek J. Soukopová J. Štencl M. Trenz O. (2011). Integration of economic environmental social and corporate governance performance and reporting in enterprises. Acta Universitatis Agriculturae et Silviculturae Mendelianae Brunensis 59(7) 157-166.

  • Ioannou I. Serafeim G. (2011). The Consequences of Mandatory Corporate Sustainability Reporting. Working paper 11-100. Harvard Business School. Retrieved August 25 2014 from

  • IFAC. (2012). Investor demand for environmental social and governance disclosures: Implications for professional accountants in business. Retrieved June 17 2014 from

  • Jungman C. (2006). The effectiveness of corporate governance in one-tier and two-tier board systems - evidence from the UK and Germany. European Company and Financial Law Review 3(4) 426-474.

  • Kavalír P. (2005). Hodnocení corporate governance v Ceské republice. Working Paper CESVŠEM.Retrieved June 18 2014 from

  • Klírová J. (2001). Corporate governance: správa a rízení obchodních spolecností. Praha: Management Press.

  • Kocmanová A. Docekalová M. (2012). Construction of the economic indicators of performance in relation to environmental social and corporate governance (ESG) factors. Acta Universitatis Agriculturaeet Silviculturae Mendelianae Brunensis 60(4) 141-149.

  • KocmanováA. Docekalová M. Hornungová J. (2011). Corporate Governance andVolutaryReporting in the CzechRepublic Business Companies. In Creating Global Competitive Economies. 1. Milan Italy: International Business Information Management Association (IBIMA) 2011. p. 1557-1571.

  • Kocmanová A. Šimberová I. (2012). Modelling of Corporate Governance Performance Indicators. Engineering Economics 23(5) 485-495.

  • Malý M. Theodor M. Peklo J. (2002). Rízení a správa spolecností: (Corporate governance). Praha: VŠKE.

  • OECD. (2008). Handbook on Constructing Composite Indicators. Methodology and User Guide. Retrieved March 1 2014 from

  • OECD. (2004). Principles of Corporate Governance. Retrieved June 18 2014 from

  • RiskMetrics Group. (2009). Study on Monitoring and Enforcement Practices in Corporate Governance in the Member States. Retrieved November 28 2014 from

  • Rucková P. (2008). Corporate Governance v Ceské republice. Praha: Professional Publishing.

  • Shleifer A. Vishny R. W. (1997). A survey of corporate governance. Journal of Finance 52(2) 737-783.

  • Solomon J. Corporate governance and accountability (2nd ed.). Hoboken: Wiley.

  • Škaloudová A. (2010). Faktorová analýza. Charles University in Prague. Retrieved January 1 2014 from

  • UNCTAD. (2008). Guidance on Corporate Responsibility Indicators in Annual Reports. Retrieved June 17 2014 from

Journal information
Impact Factor

CiteScore 2018: 0.5

SCImago Journal Rank (SJR) 2018: 0.24
Source Normalized Impact per Paper (SNIP) 2018: 0.276

All Time Past Year Past 30 Days
Abstract Views 0 0 0
Full Text Views 1251 814 37
PDF Downloads 572 409 28