Legal Rules on the Protection of Animals in Hungary

Open access


For centuries, man, as an important part of nature, has caused irreparable damage to its equilibrium. After the Second World War, it became clear that this process had led to the extinction of several species of animals. In spite of the importance of biodiversity, it only became an international, political concept after the Earth Summit in 1992. This was held in Rio de Janeiro, where the Agreement on Biodiversity was signed by many countries. Since then, biodiversity as a term has been widely used by politicians, the media, social organisations and others.

The European Union intends to validate strict requirements and provisions concerning animal protection. Most of these provisions have been legally validated in Hungary, but the country still lags behind in some respects. Further problems accrue as legal regulations concerning protected animals have been very hard to enforce in practice.

Overall, we can conclude that, in order to successfully protect animals, society should improve its way of looking at animals as a living part of nature. Without such an attitude, even the most perfect statutes cannot effectively ensure the protection of animals.

If the inline PDF is not rendering correctly, you can download the PDF file here.

  • Bándi Gy. (1991). Right to environment. In Katonáné Soltész M. (ed.). Human rights in today’s Hungary. Budapest: Mezon Kiadó.

  • Bánki M. (1988). The place of legislation on the protection of the environment within the Hungarian legal system. In Tamás A.; Lodner D. (eds.). Environmental control and policy: Proceedings of the Hungarian - Polish Seminar on the theoretical problems of environmental control and policy. Pécs: Centre for Regional Studies.

  • Benkőné Lodner D. (1988). The legal regulation of nature conservation in the Hungarian People’s Republic with special regard to the conservation areas. In Tamás A.; Lodner D. (eds.). Environmental control and policy: Proceedings of the Hungarian - Polish Seminar on the theoretical problems of environmental control and policy. Pécs: Centre for Regional Studies.

  • Bochniarz Z. Bolan R. Kerekes S. Kindler J. (2003). Designing institutions for sustainable development in Hungary: Agenda for the future. Minneapolis - Budapest: Center for Environmental Studies.

  • Gall A. et al. (2001). Ablak a természetre. Évszázadok állatkertje Budapesten. (“Window to Nature. A Century of the Budapest Zoo”). Budapest: Fovárosi Állat és Növénykert.

  • Gubányi A. Creemers R. (1994). Population structure of water frogs in a foodplain of the river Dunabe in Hungary. Zoologica Poloniae. Vol. 39 (3-4) 441-445.

  • Hinrichsen D. Enyedi Gy. (1990). State of the Hungarian environment. Budapest: Statistical Publishing House.

  • Kenyeres L. ifj. Tildy Z. (1996). Védett természeti ritkaságaink. (“Protected Natural Resorts in Hungary”). Budapest: Mezogazdasági Kiadó.

  • Láng I. (1999). The environmental aspects of Hungary’s EU accession. European Mirror 4 (Special Issue) 46-57.

  • Nováky E. Hideg É. (1991). Developing environmental strategies: Through futures research. Budapest: Aqua Kiadó.

  • Prugberger T. (2001). A globalizáció és a környezetvédelem neuralgikus kérdései a jogalkotás a jogkövetés és a jogalkalmazás síkján. (“Problems in the law-making and application of law in environmental protection and globalisation”). Magyar Közigazgatás 51 (10) 619-625.

  • Rakonczay Z. (1998). Természetvédelem. (“Protection of Nature”). Budapest: Mezogazdasági Szaktudás Kiadó.

  • Waliczky Z. (1992). Európai jelentoségu madárélohelyek Magyarországon. (“Bird Habitat of European Importance in Hungary”). Budapest: Magyar Madártani és Természetvédelmi Egyesület.

  • Zoltán Ö. (1992). Az állatvédelem jogi szabályozásáról. (“The legal regulation of animal protection”). Magyar Jog 39 (7) 401-405.

  • Zoltán Ö. (1997). Az állatvédelmi törvény elé. (“Law on animal protection: Looking forward”). Magyar Jog 44 (7) 407-415.

  • Zoltán Ö. (1999). Az állatvédelmi törvény után. (“Law on animal protection: looking back”). Magyar Jog 46 (4) 215-222.

  • Zoltán Ö. (2000). Az állatvédelem jogi rendje. (“The legal regime of animal protection”). Budapest: Közgazdasági és Jogi Könyvkiadó.

  • Act XXVIII. of 1998 on the Protection of the Environment (General Rules) Hungary.

  • Act LIII. of 1996 on Nature Conservation Hungary. 19/1997 (04. 07.)KTM order on confiscated animals and plants under protection Hungary.

Journal information
Impact Factor

CiteScore 2018: 0.5

SCImago Journal Rank (SJR) 2018: 0.24
Source Normalized Impact per Paper (SNIP) 2018: 0.276

All Time Past Year Past 30 Days
Abstract Views 0 0 0
Full Text Views 166 36 6
PDF Downloads 90 35 4