Application of the Institute of Income Redistribution in the Form of Social Transfers in EU Countries

Open access


The reduction in the number of households living at risk of poverty is a common objective of EU countries but the social policy of each member state is different. This paper provides an overview of components of social transfers and their share in total household incomes in EU countries. The aim of the paper is to assess the effectiveness of the social systems of each on the basis of the number of households at risk of poverty determined before and after the payment of social benefits. Four segments of EU countries were identified in cluster analysis according to their approach to social transfer settings using primary data from EU-SILC survey. The combination of high share of social benefits and low share of old age pensions proves to be better in the fight against poverty. The relationship between an economic performance and a functioning social policy system appears in EU countries.

If the inline PDF is not rendering correctly, you can download the PDF file here.

  • Aisa R. Larramona G. Pueyo F. (2019). Poverty in Europe by gender: The role of education and labour status. Economic Analysis and Policy 63 24–34.

  • Anderson K. M. (2015). Social policy in the European Union. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.

  • Álvarez-Gálvez J. Jaime-Castillo A. M. (2018). The impact of social expenditure on health inequalities in Europe. Social Science & Medicine 200 9–18.

  • Beckerman W. (1979). Poverty and the impact of income maintenance programmes in four developed countries: case studies of Australia Belgium Norway and Great Britain. Geneva: International Labour Office.

  • Chakravarty S. R. (2010). Inequality polarization and poverty. New York: Springer.

  • Clair A. Loopstra R. Reeves A. McKee M. Dorling D. Stuckler D. (2016). The impact of housing payment problems on health status during economic recession: A comparative analysis of longitudinal EU SILC data of 27 European states 2008–2010. SSM – Population Health 2 306–316.

  • Eurostat. (2017). EU statistics on income and living conditions (EU-SILC) methodology available at:

  • Eurostat1. (2018). Glossary: At-risk-of-poverty rate available at:

  • Eurostat2. (2018). Household characteristics by activity and employment status of the reference person available at:

  • Eurostat3. (2018). Duration of working life – annual data available at:

  • Eurostat. (2019). Real GDP per capita available at:

  • Fahey T. (2005). The Case for an EU-wide Measure of poverty. European Sociological Review 23(1) 35–47.

  • Fialová H. (2004). Malý ekonomický výkladový slovník. Praha: A plus.

  • Halleröd B. Larsson D. (2008). Poverty welfare problems and social exclusion. International Journal of Social Welfare 17(1) 15–25.

  • IBM Knowledge Center. (2019). K-Means Cluster Analysis available at:

  • Keeley B. (2015). Income Inequality: The Gap between Rich and Poor. OECD Publishing. Paris.

  • Kluge A. F. Goldstein R. T. Vogt C. (2019). Transfers in an aging European Union. The Journal of the Economics of Ageing 13 45–54.

  • Krell K. Frick J. R. (2017). Measuring the Consistency of Cross-sectional and Longitudinal Income Information in EU-SILC. The Review of Income and Wealth 63(1) 30–52.

  • Kujala P. Kallio J. Niemelä M. (2019). Income Inequality Poverty and Fear of Crime in Europe. Cross-Cultural Research 52(2) 163–185.

  • Meloun M. Militký J. (2012). Kompendium statistického zpracování dat. Praha: Karolinum.

  • Mitchell D. (1991). Income Transfers in Ten Welfare States. Brookfield USA: Avebury.

  • Nicola P. C. (2013). Efficiency and Equity in Welfare Economics. New York: Springer.

  • Nolan B. Whelan C. T. (2010). Using Non-Monetary Deprivation Indicators to Analyze Poverty and Social Exclusion: Lessons from Europe? Journal of Policy Analysis and Management. 29(2) 305–325.

  • Perkins D. H. Radelet S. Lindauer D. L. Block S. A. (2012). Economics of Development. New York and London: W. W. Norton.

  • Slaný A. (2003). Makroekonomická analýza a hospodářská politika. Praha: C. H. Beck.

  • Stangor Ch. (2011). Research methods for the behavioral sciences. Belmont CA: Wadsworth Cengage Learning.

  • Stiglitz J. E. Sen A. Fitoussi J. (2009). Report by the Commission on the Measurement of Economic Performance and Social Progress available at:

  • Zerbe R. O. (2001). Economic efficiency in law and economics. Northampton MA: Edward Elgar.

Journal information
Impact Factor

CiteScore 2018: 0.5

SCImago Journal Rank (SJR) 2018: 0.24
Source Normalized Impact per Paper (SNIP) 2018: 0.276

All Time Past Year Past 30 Days
Abstract Views 0 0 0
Full Text Views 51 51 6
PDF Downloads 16 16 3