The Connection between Corporate Social Responsibility and Corporate Respect for Human Rights

Open access


The purpose of this article is to study the connection between corporate respect for human rights and corporate social responsibility. The author argues that business entities have a responsibility to respect human rights and that this responsibility forms part of their corporate social responsibility. The author defends the view that business and human rights issues are distinct from corporate social responsibility issues in their legal nature and content, while the strategic approach in the implementation of these concepts is the same. The author further examines whether voluntary corporate social responsibility initiatives include human rights, and how society understands the connection between the two. The conclusions of the article shed light on the interconnection between these two terms.

If the inline PDF is not rendering correctly, you can download the PDF file here.

  • Addo M. K. (2014). The Reality of the United Nations Guiding Principles on Business and Human Rights. Human Rights Law Review 14(1) 133–147.

  • Arkani S.; Theobald R. (2005). Corporate involvement in human rights: is it any of their business? Business Ethics: A European Review 14(3) 190–205.

  • Arnold D. G. (2010). Transnational Corporations and the Duty to Respect Basic Human Rights. Business Ethics Quarterly 20(3) 371–399.

  • Bilchitz D. (2013). A chasm between ‘is’ and ‘ought’? A critique of the normative foundations of the SRSG’s Framework and the Guiding Principles. In Deva S.; Bilchitz D. (eds.). Human Rights Obligations of Business: Beyond the Corporate Responsibility to Respect? Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

  • Buhmann K. (2006). Corporate social responsibility: what role for law? Some aspects of law and CSR. Corporate Governance: The International Journal of Business in Society 6(2) 188–202.

  • Buhmann K. (2011). Integrating human rights in emerging regulation of Corporate Social Responsibility: the EU case. International Journal of Law in Context 7(2) 139–179.

  • Campbell T. (2006). A human rights approach to developing voluntary codes of conduct for multinational corporations. Business Ethics Quarterly 16(2) 255–269.

  • Carasco E. F.; Singh J. B. (2008) Human Rights in Global Business Ethics Codes. Business & Society Review 113(3) 347–374.

  • Carroll A. B. (1979). A Three-Dimensional Conceptual Model of Corporate Performance. The Academy of Management Review 4(4) 497–505.

  • Carroll A. B. (1991). The Pyramid of Corporate Social Responsibility: Toward the Moral Management of Organizational Stakeholders. Business Horizons 34(4) 39–48.

  • Commission of the European Communities (2001 July 18). Green Paper: Promoting a European framework for corporate social responsibility COM(2001)366.

  • Commission of the European Communities (2006 March 22). Communication from the Commission to the European Parliament the Council and the European Economic and Social Committee – Implementing the partnership for growth and jobs: making Europe a pole of excellence on corporate social responsibility COM(2006)136 final.

  • Corporate Duty of Vigilance Law. (2017). Retrieved May 31 2018 from

  • Čertanec A. (2015). Varstvo človekovih pravic pri delovanju gospodarskih subjektov po Smernicah Združenih narodov. Ljubljana.

  • Economic and Social Council (2006 February 22). Interim Report of the Special Representative of the Secretary-General on the Issue of Human Rights and Transnational Corporations and Other Business Enterprises’ E/CN.4/2006/97.

  • Cragg W. (2012). Ethics Enlightened Self-Interest and the Corporate Responsibility to Respect Human Rights: A Critical Look at the Justificatory Foundations of the UN Framework. Business Ethics Quarterly 22(1) 9–36.

  • De la Vega C.; Mehra A. (2009). International Legal Accountability over Non-State Actors: An Analysis of the Report of the Special Representative of the Secretary General. Zeitschrift für Menschenrechte 3(2) 26–40.

  • Emeseh E.; Songi O. (2014). CSR human rights abuse and sustainability report accountability. International Journal of Law and Management 56(2) 136–151.

  • European Commission (2011 October 25). A Renewed EU Strategy 2011–14 for Corporate Social Responsibility COM(2011)681.

  • European Commission (2012 November 30). My business and human rights: A guide to human rights for small and medium-sized enterprises. Retrieved July 31 2017 from

  • European Parliament and Council (2014). Directive 2014/95/EU of the European Parliament and of the Council of 22 October 2014 amending Directive 2013/34/EU as regards disclosure of non-financial and diversity information by certain large undertakings and groups OJ L 330/1.

  • GRI (2008). Reporting on Human Rights. Amsterdam: GRI.

  • GRI (2017). GRI Standards. Retrieved July 31 2017 from

  • GRI (2019). GRI 412: Human Rights Assessment. Retrieved March 1 2019 from

  • Hsieh N. (2015). Should Business Have Human Rights Obligations? Journal of Human Rights 14(2) 218–236.

  • Human Rights Council (2011 March 21). Guiding Principles on Business and Human Rights: Implementing the United Nations “Protect Respect and Remedy” Framework A/HRC/17/31.

  • Institute for Human Rights and Business (2011). The ‘State of Play’ of Human Rights Due Diligence: Anticipating the Next Five Years. London: Institute for Human Rights and Business.

  • International Organization for Standardization (2010 November 1). ISO 26000 – Guidance on social responsibility. Retrieved July 31 2017 from

  • Fasterling B.; Demuijnck G. (2013). Human Rights in the Void? Due Diligence in the UN Guiding Principles on Business and Human Rights. Journal of Business Ethics 116 799–814.

  • Jenkins R. (2001 April). Corporate Codes of Conduct Self-Regulation in a Global Economy. United Nations Research Institute for Social Development Technology Business and Society Programme Paper Number 2. Retrieved July 31 2015 from$file/jenkins.pdf.

  • Kamminga M. T. (2016). Company Responses to Human Rights Reports: An Empirical Analysis. Business and Human Rights Journal 1(1) 95–110.

  • Kinley D.; Tadaki J. (2003–2004). From Talk to Walk: The Emergence of Human Rights Responsibilities for Corporations at International Law. Virginia Journal of International Law 44(4) 931–1023.

  • Korže B. (1993). Ustavni temelji podjetništva. Podjetje in Delo 19 (5/6) 461–468.

  • Korže B. (2006). Do takeovers downgrade the contents of human rights and freedoms in EU? The IPSI BgD Transactions on Advanced Research 2(1) 51–60.

  • Korže B. (2014). Obligations of the social market state and business entities according to the EU guiding principles. International Journal of Business and Public Administration 11(2) 1–22.

  • Letnar Černič J. (2003). Mednarodnopravna odgovornost multinacionalnih družb za kršenje temeljnih človekovih pravic. Pamfil 25–28.

  • Letnar Černič J. (2009). Družbena odgovornost gospodarskih družb. Pravna praksa 28(27) 9–11.

  • Letnar Černič J. (2011). Corporate Human Rights Obligations: Towards Binding International Legal Obligations? Dignitas 49/50 55–104.

  • Lund-Thomsen P. (2008). The Global Sourcing and Codes of Conduct Debate: Five Myths and Five Recommendations. Development and Change 39 (6) 1005–1018.

  • Matten D.; Moon J. (2008). “Implicit” and “Explicit” CSR: A Conceptual Framework for a Comparative Understanding of Corporate Social Responsibility. Academy of Management Review 33(2) 404–424.

  • McBeth A. (2010). International Economic Actors and Human Rights. London New York: Routledge.

  • McBeth A.; Joseph S. (2005). Same Words Different Language: Corporate Perceptions of Human Rights Responsibilities. Australian Journal of Human Rights 11(2) 95–127.

  • McCorquodale R. (2009). Corporate Social Responsibility and International Human Rights Law. Journal of Business Ethics 87 385–400.

  • McCorquodale R.; Smit L.; Neely S.; Brooks R. (2017). Human Rights Due Diligence in Law and Practice: Good Practices and Challenges for Business Enterprises. Business and Human Rights Journal 2(2) 195–224.

  • Ministry of Foreign Affairs of the Netherlands (2014). National Action Plan on Business and Human Rights. Hague: Ministry of Foreign Affairs.

  • Monshipouri M. et al (2003). Multinational Corporations and the Ethics of Global Responsibility: Problems and Possibilities. Human Rights Quarterly 25 (4) 965–989.

  • Muchlinski P. (2001). Human rights and multinationals: is there a problem? International Affairs 77 (1) 31–47.

  • Obara Louise J. (2017). “What Does This Mean”?: How UK Companies Make Sense of Human Right. Business and Human Rights Journals 2(2) 249–273.

  • Obara L. J.; Peattie K. (2017). Bridging the Great Divide? Making Sense of the Human Rights-CSR Relationship in UK Multinational Companies. Journal of World Business 53(6) 781–793.

  • OECD (2011). OECD Guidelines for Multinational Enterprises. Retrieved July 31 2017 from

  • Pedersen E. R.; Andersen M. (2006). Safeguarding corporate social responsibility (CSR) in global supply chains: how codes of conduct are managed in buyer-supplier relationships. Journal of Public Affairs (3/4) 228–240.

  • Porter M. E.; Kramer M. R. (2006). Strategy and Society: The Link Between Competitive Advantage and Corporate Social Responsibility. Harvard Business Review 84(12) 78–92.

  • Preuss L.; Brown D. (2012). Business Policies on Human Rights: An Analysis of Their Content and Prevalence Among FTSE 100 Firms. Journal of Business Ethics 109(3) 289–299.

  • Rabet D. (2009). Human Rights and Globalization: The Myth of Corporate Social Responsibility? Journal of Alternative Perspectives in the Social Sciences 1(2) 463–475.

  • Ramasastry A. (2015). Corporate Social Responsibility Versus Business and Human Rights: Bridging the Gap Between Responsibility and Accountability. Journal of Human Rights 14(2) 237–259.

  • Ruggie J. G. (2013). Just Business: Multinational Corporations and Human Rights (1st ed.). New York and London: Norton.

  • Schwartz M. S.; Carroll A. B. (2003). Corporate Social Responsibility: A Three-Domain Approach. Business Ethics Quarterly 13(4) 503–530.

  • Soh C. (2013). Extending Corporate Liability to Human Rights Violations in Asia. Journal of International and Area Studies 20(1) 23–38.

  • Steiner J. F.; Steiner G. A. (2003). Business Government And Society: A Managerial Perspective (10th ed). Boston: McGraw-Hill/Irvin.

  • Taylor M. B. (2011). The Ruggie Framework: Polycentric regulation and the implications for corporate social responsibility. Nordic Journal of Applied Ethics / Etikk i praksis 5(1) 9–30.

  • The Companies Act. (2013). Retrieved July 31 2017 from

  • United Nations (1983 May 21). UN Draft Code of Conduct on Transnational Corporations E/1983/17/Rev. 1.

  • UN Global Compact (2017a). The Ten Principles of the UN Global Compact. Retrieved July 31 2017 from

  • UN Global Compact (2017b). Principle One: Human Rights. Retrieved July 31 2017 from

  • UN Global Compact and Office of the High Commissioner for Human Rights (2017). The UN Guiding Principles on Business and Human Rights: Relationship to UN Global Compact Commitments. Retrieved July 31 2017 from

  • United Nations: Office of the High Commissioner for Human Rights (2012 June). The Corporate Responsibility to Respect Human Rights: An Interpretive Guide HR/PUB/12/02.

  • Van Huijstee M. et al (2012 November). How to Use the UN Guiding Principles on Business and Human Rights in Company Research and Advocacy – A Guide for Civil Society Organisations. Retrieved March 1 2016 from

  • Weissbrodt D. (2005). Business and Human Rights. University of Cincinnati Law Review 74 55–73.

  • Wettstein F. (2009). Beyond Voluntariness Beyond CSR: Making a Case for Human. Rights and Justice. Business and Society Review 114(1) 125–152.

  • Wettstein F. (2012). CSR and the Debate on Business and Human Rights: Bridging the Great Divide. Business Ethics Quarterly 22(4) 739–770.

  • Wheeler S. (2015). Global production CSR and human rights: the courts of public opinion and the social licence to operate. The International Journal of Human Rights 19(6) 757–778.

  • World Conference on Human Rights (1993 June 25). Vienna Declaration and Programme of Action A/CONF.15/23.

  • Wright M.; Lehr A. (2006 December 12). Business Recognition of Human Rights: Global Patterns Regional and Sectoral Variations. Corporate Social Responsibility Initiative. Retrieved July 31 2017 from

Journal information
Impact Factor

CiteScore 2018: 0.5

SCImago Journal Rank (SJR) 2018: 0.24
Source Normalized Impact per Paper (SNIP) 2018: 0.276

All Time Past Year Past 30 Days
Abstract Views 0 0 0
Full Text Views 137 137 58
PDF Downloads 78 78 30