Occupational health and safety (OHS) management is a cycle of decision-making processes, many of which are in fact multi-criterion processes in nature. Therefore, it is important to look for and develop tools to support decision-makers in their actions aimed at improving work safety levels. The objective of this paper is to propose and verify the fuzzy TOPSIS (Technique for Order Preference by Similarity to Ideal Solution) method applied to compare and assess the ways OHS management systems function in different companies. The fuzzy TOPSIS method has already been used for a number of years in assessments of alternative solutions in many different areas, but the application that uses ordered fuzzy numbers is quite original in nature. It is especially beneficial to use the fuzzy approach in OHS management systems, as it makes it possible for experts to assess different criteria using most frequently used linguistic variables. The adopted approach was verified in the study of OHS management systems in four furniture manufacturing companies. Assessment criteria were requirements of the PN-N 18001: 2004 Standard. Thanks to the ordered fuzzy TOPSIS method, the analysed OHS management systems were streamlined from the point of view of 24 assessment criteria, and the best and the worst functioning system was identified. The approach presented here may constitute a significant tool for improving OHS management systems.
If the inline PDF is not rendering correctly, you can download the PDF file here.
Alteren B. 1999. Implementation and evaluation of the Safety Element Method at four mining sites Safety Science 31(3) 231-264 DOI: 10.1016/S0925-7535(98)00069-1
Cambon J. Guarnieri F. Groeneweg J. 2006. Towards a new tool for measuring safety management system performance [In:] E. Rigaud E. Hollnagel (Eds.) Proceeding of the Second Resilience Engineering Symposium Less Press Paris France 53-62.
Chen C.-F. Chen S.-F. 2012. Scale development of safety management system evaluation for the airline industry Accident Analysis & Prevention 47 177-181 DOI: 10.1016/j.aap.2012.01.012
Chen S. J. Hwang C. L. 1992. Fuzzy Multiple Attribute Decision Making: Methods and Applications Springer Berlin.
EU-OSHA 2011. Occupational Safety and Health Culture Assessment – A Review of Main Approaches and Selected Tools Bilbao Spain.
Fernández-Muñiz B. Montes-Peón J. M. Vázquez-Ordás C. J. 2009. Relation between occupational safety management and firm performance Safety Science 47 980-991 DOI: 10.1016/j.ssci.2008.10.022
Holubová V. 2016. Integrated Safety Management Systems Polish Journal of Management Studies 14(1) DOI: 10.17512/pjms.2016.14.1.10
Hwang C. L. Yoon K. 1981. Multiple Attribute Decision Making. Methods and Applications Springer Berlin Heidelberg.
ILO 2013. Audit Matrix for the ILO Guidelines on Occupational Safety and Health Management Systems (ILO-OSH 2001) ILO Switzerland 2013 115-116.
Kosiński W. Prokopowicz P. Ślęzak D. 2003. Ordered fuzzy numbers Bulletin of the Polish Academy of Sciences Mathematic 52(3) 327-339.
Nja O. Fjelltun S.H. 2010. Managers’ attitudes towards safety measures in the commercial transport sector Safety Science 48 1073-1080 DOI: 10.1016/j.ssci.2010.02.005
Redinger C. F. Levine S. P. 1998. Development and evaluation of the Michigan occupational health and safety management system assessment instrument: a universal OHSMS performance management tool American Industrial Hygiene Association Journal 59(8) 572-581 DOI: 10.1080/15428119891010758
Roy M. Desmarais L. Cadieux J. 2005. Ameliorer la performance en SST: les resultats vs les predicteurs Perspectives interdisciplinaires sur le travail et la sante 7(2) [http://pistes.uqam.ca/v7n2/articles/v7n2a10.htm].
Vinodkumar M.N. Bhasi M. 2010. Safety management practices and safety behaviour: assessing the mediating role of safety knowledge and motivation Accident Analysis & Prevention 42 2082-2093 DOI: 10.1016/j.aap.2010.06.021
Yingming W. 1997. Using the method of maximizing deviation to make decision for multi-indices Journal of Systems Engineering and Electronics 8(7) 21-26.