Development of Models for the Estimation of Mouth Level Exposure to Aerosol Constituents from a Heat-Not-Burn Tobacco Product Using Mouthpiece Analysis

Open access

Summary

Philip Morris International has developed a heat-not-burn tobacco heating system (THS 2.2) that produces an aerosol without combustion. Adult smokers are anticipated to use the product with differing behaviors, such as puffing volume or puffing frequency, therefore it was important to find an easy way to study how users are exposed to the aerosol constituents. Thus, the intended outcome of this study was to propose and assess a simple approach for the estimation of THS users’ exposure to harmful and potentially harmful constituents (HPHCs).

THS operates using tobacco sticks (HeatSticks) that include a mouthpiece and a tobacco plug which, when heated, generates an aerosol. The analysis of nicotine retained in the mouthpiece of the HeatSticks during use was identified as a potential approach to estimate users’ mouth level exposure (MLE) to HPHCs. Consequently, the following study was conducted with the objectives 1.) to assess the correlation between the quantity of retained nicotine in the mouthpiece (Nicotine MP) of the HeatSticks and the nicotine delivered in the aerosol of machine-smoked products, 2.) to verify the practical range for Nicotine MP based on the analysis of used HeatSticks left by THS users, and 3.) to develop models describing the relationship between Nicotine MP and specific aerosol constituents measured in the aerosol of machine-smoked products.

The regular non-mentholated HeatSticks variant was machine-smoked under various smoking regimens to cover the range of anticipated human puffing behaviors. The suitability of this practical range of machine-smoking conditions was verified by collecting used HeatSticks from two different trials conducted with THS users. The determined Nicotine MP distribution indicated that the machine-smoked regimens encompassed the range observed for users.

Multiple Linear Regression (MLR) combined with a stepwise approach was used for selecting models describing the relationship between Nicotine MP and specific aerosol constituents. The stepwise approach interactively explores which amongst various tested predictors provides a good fit. The developed models showed good adjusted coefficients of determination (i.e., R2 adj. ≥ 0.75) for 28 out of the 43 investigated HPHCs.

Previously published studies showed that actual MLE can be estimated from cigarette filter analysis. This study demonstrated that the analysis of nicotine in THS mouthpiece (filter section) corresponded to an estimation of the upper limits of MLE, in line with maximum possible usage conditions.

1. Ashton, H. and D.W. Watson: Puffing Frequency and Nicotine Intake in Cigarette Smokers; Brit. Med. J. 3 (1970) 679–681.

2. Forbes, W.F., J.C. Robinson, J.A. Hanley, and H.N. Colburn: Studies on the Nicotine Exposure of Individual Smokers. I. Changes in Mouth Level Exposure to Nicotine on Switching to Lower Nicotine Cigarettes; Int. J. Addict. 11 (1976) 933–950.

3. Schulz, W. and F. Seehofer: Smoking Behaviour in Germany – The Analysis of Cigarette Butts (KIPA); in: Smoking Behaviour, edited by R.E. Thornton, Churchill-Livingstone, Edinburgh, United Kingdom, 1978, pp. 259–276.

4. Hyodo, T., K. Minagawa, T. Inoue, J. Fujimoto, N. Minami, R. Bito, and A. Mikita: Estimation of Mouth Level Exposure to Smoke Constituents of Cigarettes with Different “Tar” Levels Using Filter Analysis; Regul. Toxicol. Pharmacol. 67 (2013) 486–498. DOI: 10.1016/j.yrtph.2013.09.009

5. Ding YS, J. Ward, D. Hammond, and C.H. Watson: Mouth-Level Intake of Benzo[a]pyrene from Reduced Nicotine Cigarettes; Int. J. Environ. Res. Public. Health 11 (2014) 11898–11914. DOI: 10.3390/ijerph111111898

6. Pauly, J.L., R.J. O’Connor, G.M. Paszkiewicz, K.M. Cummings, M.V. Djordjevic, and P.G. Shields: Cigarette Filter-Based Assays as Proxies for Toxicant Exposure and Smoking Behavior – A Literature Review; Cancer. Epidemiol. Biomarkers Prev. 18 (2009) 3321–3333. DOI: 10.1158/1055-9965.EPI-09-0925

7. Clayton, P.M., K. Prasad, and A. Sisodiya:The Development and Application of a Method for the Estimation of Mouth Level Exposure (MLE) to Four Tobacco Specific Nitrosamines; CORESTA Congress, Edinburgh, 2010, SS 10. Available at: https://www.coresta.org/abstracts/development-and-application-method-estimation-mouth-level-exposure-mle-four-tobacco (accessed November 2016)

8. Moldoveanu, S., W. Coleman III, and J. Wilkins: Determination of Carbonyl Compounds in Exhaled Cigarette Smoke; Beitr. Tabakforsch. Int. 22 (2007) 346–357. DOI: 10.2478/cttr-2013-0841

9. Moldoveanu, S., W. Coleman III, and J. Wilkins: Determination of Hydroxybenzenes in Exhaled Cigarette Smoke; Beitr. Tabakforsch. Int. 23 (2008) 97–105. DOI: 10.2478/cttr-2013-0852

10. Moldoveanu, S., W. Coleman III, and J. Wilkins: Determination of Polycyclic Aromatic Hydrocarbons in Exhaled Cigarette Smoke; Beitr. Tabakforsch. Int. 23 (2008) 85–97. DOI: 10.2478/cttr-2013-0851

11. Moldoveanu, S., W. Coleman III, and J. Wilkins: Determination of Benzene and Toluene in Exhaled Cigarette Smoke; Beitr. Tabakforsch. Int. 23 (2008) 107–114. DOI: 10.2478/cttr-2013-0853

12. Urban, H.J., A.R. Tricker, D.E. Leyden, N. Forte, V. Zenzen, A. Feuersenger, M. Assink, G. Kallischnigg, and M.K. Schorp: Reduced Exposure Evaluation of an Electrically Heated Cigarette Smoking System – Part 8: Nicotine Bridging - Estimating Smoke Constituent Exposure by their Relationships to Both Nicotine Levels in Mainstream Cigarette Smoke and in Smokers; Regul. Toxicol. Pharmacol. 64 Suppl. (2012) S85–S97. DOI:10.1016/j.yrtph.2012.08.005

13. Zenzen, V., J. Diekmann, B. Gerstenberg, S. Weber, S. Wittke, and M.K. Schorp: Reduced Exposure Evaluation of an Electrically Heated Cigarette Smoking System – Part 2: Smoke Chemistry and In Vitro Toxicological Evaluation Using Smoking Regimens Reflecting Human Puffing Behavior; Regul. Toxicol. Pharmacol. 64 Suppl. 2 (2012) S11–S34. DOI: 10.1016/j.yrtph.2012.08.004

14. De La Bourdonnaye, G., T. Bachmann, C. Haziza, P. Picavet, G. Baker, D. Skiada, K. Jarus-Dziedzic, and F. Lüdicke: Investigation on Puffing Topography Parameters and Product Evaluation Recorded During Five Days of Use of the Tobacco Heating System 2.2. A Comparison With Continued Combustible Cigarette Use. Available at: https://www.pmiscience.com/library/investigation-puffing-topography-parameters-and-product-evaluation-recorded-during-five-days (accessed November, 2016)

15. International Organization of Standardization (ISO): ISO 3402:1999 Tobacco and Tobacco Products – Atmosphere for Conditioning and Testing; ISO, Geneva, Switzerland, 1999. Available at: http://www.iso.org/iso/home/store/catalogue_tc/catalogue_detail.htm?csnumber=28324 (accessed November, 2016)

16. International Organization of Standardization (ISO): ISO 4387: 2000 Cigarettes – Determination of Total and Nicotine Free Dry Particulate Matter Using a Routine Analytical Smoking Machine; ISO, Geneva, Switzerland, 2000. Available at: http://www.iso.org/iso/iso_catalogue/catalogue_tc/catalogue_detail.htm?csnumber=28323 (accessed November, 2016)

17. Health Canada: Official Method T-115 – Determination of “Tar”, Nicotine and Carbon Monoxide in Mainstream Tobacco; 1999.

18. International Organization of Standardization (ISO): ISO 8454:2007 Cigarettes – Determination of Carbon Monoxide in the Vapour Phase of Cigarette Smoke – NDIR Method; ISO, Geneva, Switzerland, 2007. Available at: http://www.iso.org/iso/home/store/catalogue_tc/catalogue_detail.htm?csnumber=41168 (accessed November, 2016)

19. International Organization of Standardization (ISO): ISO 10315:2013 Cigarettes – Determination of Nicotine in Smoke Condensates – Gas-Chromatographic Method; ISO, Geneva, Switzerland, 2013. Available at: http://www.iso.org/iso/home/store/catalogue_tc/catalogue_detail.htm?csnumber=56744 (accessed November, 2016)

20. Cooperation Centre for Scientific Research Relative to Tobacco (CORESTA): CORESTA Recommended Method CRM No 70 – Determination of Selected Volatile Organic Compounds in Mainstream Cigarette Smoke by GC-MS; CORESTA, Paris, France, 2014. Available at https://www.coresta.org/sites/default/files/technical_documents/main/CRM_70-update%28July14%29.pdf (accessed November, 2016)

21. Health Canada: Official Method T-112 – Determination of Pyridine, Quinoline and Styrene in Mainstream Tobacco Smoke; 1999.

22. Cooperation Centre for Scientific Research Relative to Tobacco (CORESTA): CORESTA Recommended Method CRM No 74 – Determination of Selected Carbonyls in Mainstream Cigarette Smoke by HPLC; CORESTA, Paris, France, 2014. Available at https://www.coresta.org/sites/default/files/technical_documents/main/CRM_74-update%28July14%29.pdf (accessed November, 2016)

23. Health Canada: Official Method T-102 – Determination of 1- and 2-Aminonapthalene and 3- and 4-Aminobiphenyl in Mainstream Tobacco Smoke, 1999.

24. Health Canada: Official Method T-110 – Determination of Oxides of Nitrogen in Mainstream Tobacco Smoke, 1999.

25. Cooperation Centre for Scientific Research Relative to Tobacco (CORESTA): CORESTA Recommended Method CRM 79 – Determination of Ammonia in Tobacco by Ion Chromatographic Analysis; CORESTA, Paris, France, 2015. Available at: https://www.coresta.org/sites/default/files/technical_documents/main/CRM_79.pdf (accessed November 2016)

26. Cooperation Centre for Scientific Research Relative to Tobacco (CORESTA): CORESTA Recommended Method CRM No 75 – Determination of Tobacco Specific Nitrosamines in Mainstream Cigarette Smoke by LC-MS/MS; CORESTA, Paris, France, 2014. Available at: https://www.coresta.org/sites/default/files/technical_documents/main/CRM_75-updateJuly14.pdf (accessed November, 2016)

27. International Organization of Standardization (ISO): ISO 22634:2008 Determination of Benzo[a]pyrene in Cigarette Mainstream Smoke – Method Using Gas Chromatography/Mass Spectrometry; ISO, Geneva, Switzerland, 2000. Available at: http://www.iso.org/iso/home/store/catalogue_tc/catalogue_detail.htm?csnumber=41040 (accessed November, 2016)

28. Cooperation Centre for Scientific Research Relative to Tobacco (CORESTA): CORESTA Recommended Method CRM No 9 – Determination of Nicotine in Cigarette Filters by Gas Chromatographic Analysis; CORESTA, Paris, France, 2009. Available at https://www.coresta.org/sites/default/files/technical_documents/main/CRM_09-update2.pdf (accessed November, 2016)

29. Overton, J.R.: Filtration of Cigarette Smoke: Relative Contributions of Inertial Impaction, Diffusional Deposition, and Direct Impaction; Beitr. Tabakforsch. 7 (1973) 117–120. DOI: 10.2478/cttr-2013-0319

30. Dwyer, R.W. and S.G. Abel: The Efficiencies of Cellulose Acetate Filters; Beitr. Tabakforsch. Int. 13 (1986) 243–253. DOI: 10.2478/cttr-2013-0574

31. Norman, V., A.M. Ihrig, R.A. Shoffner, and M.S. Ireland: The Effect of Tip Dilution on the Filtration Efficiency of Upstream and Downstream Segments of Cigarette Filters; Beitr. Tabforsch. Int. 12 (1984) 178–185. DOI: 10.2478/cttr-2013-0539

32. Shepperd, C.J., F.K. St. Charles, M. Lien, and M. Dixon: Validation of Methods for Determining Consumer Smoked Cigarette Yields from Cigarette Filter Analysis; Beitr. Tabforsch. Int. 22 (2006) 176–184. DOI: 10.2478/cttr-2013-0826

Journal Information


CiteScore 2017: 0.63

SCImago Journal Rank (SJR) 2017: 0.309
Source Normalized Impact per Paper (SNIP) 2017: 0.403

Metrics

All Time Past Year Past 30 Days
Abstract Views 0 0 0
Full Text Views 441 441 38
PDF Downloads 183 183 16