How Cultural Parenting Impacts Children’s Academics and Creativity

Kyung Hee Kim 1  and Yi Hua 2
  • 1
  • 2

Abstract

Parent-child interactions are influenced by cultural expectations, beliefs, and values. Chinese parenting is shaped by Confucian principles. Chinese children tend to be more academically successful but less creative than American children. Yet, little is known about how actual parent-child interactions might contribute to this finding. We conducted three case studies using a social constructivist approach to parenting to explore how parent-child interactions in early childhood education might influence children’s academics and creativity. We studied 11 participants from three families: Chinese, interracial (Chinese mother and American father), and American. Through interviews, observations, and artifacts, we found that parenting decisions are influenced by parents’ cultural climates. Chinese parents trained children to learn for academic achievement; American parents encouraged children to pursue their own interests; and inter-racial parents did some of both.

If the inline PDF is not rendering correctly, you can download the PDF file here.

  • Albert, R. S. (1978). Observations and suggestions regarding giftedness, familial influence, and the achievement of eminence. Gifted Child Quarterly, 22, 201-211.

  • Albert, R. S. (1980a). Exceptionally gifted boys and their parents: Basic educational, cognitive, and creative similarities. Gifted Child Quarterly, 24, 174-179.

  • Albert, R. S. (1980b). Family positions and the attainment of eminence: study of positions and special family experiences. Gifted Child Quarterly, 24, 87-95.

  • Albert, R. S. (1980c). Genius. In. R.H. Woody (Ed.), The encyclopaedia of clinical assessment. San Francisco, CA: Jessey-Bass.

  • Ahn, S. Y., & Baek, H. J. (2013). Academic achievement-oriented society and its relationship to the psychological well-being of Korean adolescents. In C-C. Yi (Ed.), The psychological well-being of East Asian youth, V. 2 of Quality of life in Asia (pp. 265-279). Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Springer.

  • Arnold, D. H., Zeljo, A., Doctoroff, G. L., & Ortiz, C. (2008). Parent involvement in pre- school: Predictors and the relation of involvement to preliteracy development. School Psychology Review, 37, 74-90.

  • Bae, S. H., & Orlinsky, D. E. (2006). Gender, marital status, and age in the professional development of psychotherapists in Korea. Asian Journal of Women’s Studies, 12(1), 36-62.

  • Bang, H., & Montgomery, D. (2013). Wisdom and ego-identity for Korean and American late adolescents. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 44, 807-831.

  • Barkema, H. G., Chen, X. P., George, G., Luo, Y., & Tsui, A. S. (2015). West meets east: New concepts and theories. Academy of Management Journal, 58, 460-479.

  • Barron, F. (1963). Creativity and psychological health: Origins of personal vitality and creative freedom. New York, NY: Van Nostrand.

  • Bartlett, T., & Fischer, K. (2011). The China conundrum. The Chronicle of Higher Education. Retrieved from http://chronicle.com/article/The-China-Conundrum/129628/

  • Bong, M. (2008). Effects of parent-child relationships and classroom goal structures on motivation, help-seeking avoidance, and cheating. Journal of Experimental Education, 76, 191-217.

  • Brewer, P., & Venaik, S. (2011). Individualism-collectivism in Hofstede and GLOBE. Journal of International Business Studies, 42, 436-445.

  • Brockner, J., Ackerman, G., Greenberg, J., Gelfand, M. J., Francesco, A. M., Chen, Z. X., & Kirkman, B. L. (2001). Culture and procedural justice: The influence of power distance on reactions to voice. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology 37, 300-315.

  • Brooks, J. B. (1973). Familial antecedents and adult correlates of artistic interests in childhood. Journal of Personality, 41, 110-120.

  • Burks, B. S., Jensen, D. W., & Terman, L. M. (1930). The promise of youth: Vol. 3: Genetic studies of genius. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.

  • Chan, J., & Chen, Y. (2008). Processes and outcomes of encouraging universities to implement creative studies colleges. In J. Chan. (Ed.), Creative education programs in Taiwan: Development and implementation (pp. 244-257). Taipei, Taiwan: Ministry of Education.

  • Chiang, H. L., & Hadadian, A. (2009). Chinese and Chinese- American families of children with disabilities. International Journal of Special Education, 22(2), 19-23.

  • Chua, R. Y., Roth, Y., & Lemoine, J. F. (2015). The impact of culture on creativity: How cultural tightness and cultural distance affect global innovation crowdsourcing work. Administrative Science Quarterly, 60, 189-227.

  • Comeau, G., Huta, V., & Liu, Y. (2015). Work ethic, motivation, and parental influences in Chinese and North American children learning to play the piano. International Journal of Music Education, 33, 181-194.

  • Costa, P. T, Jr., & McCrae, R. R. (1985). The NEO Personality Inventory manual. Odessa, FL: Psychological Assessment Resources.

  • Cox, C. M. (1926). The early mental traits of 300 geniuses. In Vol. 2 of Genetic studies of genius. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.

  • Creswell, J. W. (1998). Qualitative inquiry and research design: Choosing among five traditions. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.

  • Creswell, J. W. (2002). Educational research: Planning, conducting, and evaluating quantitative and qualitative research. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Merrill Prentice Hall.

  • Creswell, J. W. (2013). Qualitative inquiry & research design: Choosing among five approaches (3rd ed.). Los Angeles, CA: Sage.

  • Cui, N., Xue, J., Connolly, C. A., & Liu, J. (2016). Does the gender of parent or child matter in child maltreatment in China? Child Abuse & Neglect, 54, 1-9.

  • Dewing, K. (1970). Family influence on creativity: A review and discussion. Journal of Special Education, 4, 399-404.

  • Dewing, K., & Taft, R. (1973). Some characteristics of the parents of creative twelve-year-olds. Journal of Personality, 41, 71-85.

  • Dwairy, M., & Achoui, M. (2010). Parental control: A second cross-cultural research on parenting and psychological adjustment of children. Journal of Child and Family Studies, 19, 16-22.

  • El Nokali, N. E., Bachman, H. J., & Votruba-Drzal, E. (2010). Parent involvement and children’s academic and social development in elementary school. Child Development, 81, 988-1005.

  • Elman, B. A. (2009). Civil service examinations (Keju). In Berkshire encyclopedia of China (pp. 405-410). Great Barrington, MA: Berkshire.

  • Epstein, J. L. (2010). School/Family/Community Partnerships: Caring for the children we share. Phi Delta Kappan, 92, 81-96.

  • Fearon, D. D., Copeland, D., & Saxon, T. F. (2013). The relationship between parenting styles and creativity in a sample of Jamaican children. Creativity Research Journal, 25, 119-128.

  • Feist, G. J. (1998). A meta-analysis of personality in scientific and artistic creativity. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 2, 290-309.

  • Fowler, F. C. (2013). Policy studies for educational leaders: An introduction (4 th ed.). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Pearson Education.

  • Gelfand, M. J., Raver, J. L., Nishii, L., Leslie, L. M., Lun, J., Lim, B. C.,. . . Aycan, Z. (2011). Differences between tight and loose cultures: A 33-nation study. Science, 332, 1100-1104.

  • Getzels, J. W., & Jackson, P. W. (1962). Creativity and intelligence. New York, NY: Wiley.

  • Grant, A. M. (2008). Does intrinsic motivation fuel the prosocial fire? Motivational synergy in predicting persistence, performance, and productivity. Journal of Applied Psychology, 93, 48-58.

  • Guest, G., Bunce, A., & Johnson, L. (2006). How many interviews are enough? An experiment with data saturation and variability. Field Methods, 18(1), 59-82.

  • Hayes, K. J. (1962). Genes, drives, and intellect. Psychological Reports, 10, 299-342.

  • Helson, R. (1965). Childhood interest clusters related to creativity in women. Journal of Consulting Psychology, 29, 352-361.

  • Helson, R. (1966). Personality of women with imaginative and artistic interests; The role of masculinity, originality, and other characteristics in their creativity. Journal of Personality, 34, 1-25.

  • Huntsinger, C. S., & Jose, P. E. (2009). Parental involvement in children’s schooling: Different meanings in different cultures. Early Childhood Research Quarterly, 24, 398-410.

  • Hwang, K.-K. (2001). The deep structure of Confucianism: A social psychological approach. Asian Philosophy, 11, 179-204.

  • Ice, C. L., & Hoover-Dempsey, K. V. (2011). Linking parental motivations for involvement and student proximal achievement outcomes in homeschooling and public schooling settings. Education & Urban Society, 43, 339-369.

  • Jerrim, J. (2014). Why do East Asian children perform so well in PISA? An investigation of Western-born children of East Asian descent. London, UK: University of London.

  • Jia, L., Hirt, E. R., & Karpen, S. C. (2009). Lessons from a faraway land: The effect of spatial distance on creative cognition. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 45, 1127-1131.

  • Johnson, B., & Christensen, L. (2012). Educational research: Quantitative, qualitative, and mixed approaches. 4th ed. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.

  • Kim, K. H. (2007). Exploring the interactions between Asian culture (Confucianism) and creativity. Journal of Creative Behavior, 41, 28-54.

  • Kim, K. H. (2009). Cultural influence on creativity: The relationship between Asian culture (Confucianism) and creativity among Korean educators. Journal of Creative Behavior, 43, 73-93.

  • Kim, K. H. (2016). The creativity challenge: How we can recapture American innovation. Amherst, NY: Prometheus Books.

  • Kim, K. H. (2017). The Torrance Tests of Creative Thinking Figural or Verbal: Which one should we use? Creativity: Theories-Research-Applications, 4, 302-321.

  • Kim, K. H. (2018). How can parents and teachers cultivate creative climates for children to become innovators? Childhood Education, 94(2), 10-17. DOI: 10.1515/ctra-2017-0015

  • Kim, K. H. (in press). Creativity crisis update: America follows Asia in pursuing high test scores over learning. Roeper Review.

  • Kim, K.H., Lee, H. E., Chae, K., Anderson, L., & Laurence, C. (2011). Creativity and Confucianism among American and Korean educators. Creativity Research Journal, 23, 357-371.

  • Kim, K.H., & Park S. G. (in press). How do parents’ cultural values affect children’s creativity? Creativity Research Journal.

  • Kim-Rupnow, W. S. (2005). Disability and Korean culture. In J. H. Stone (Ed.), Culture and disability: Providing culturally competent services (pp. 115-138). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.

  • Kurman, J., Liem, G. A., Ivancovsky, T., Morio, H., & Lee, J. (2015). Regulatory focus as an explanatory variable for cross-cultural differences in achievement-related behavior. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 46, 171-190.

  • Lee, H. S., & Kim, J. N. (2005). A study on expectation of parents of children with autism spectrum disorders. Journal of Special Education & Rehabilitation Science, 44, 175-193.

  • Leung, A. N., Wong, S. S., Wong, I. W., & McBride-Chang, C. (2010). Filial piety and psychosocial adjustment in Hong Kong Chinese early adolescents. Journal of Early Adolescence, 30, 651-667.

  • Li, C., & Wu, J. (2011). The structural relationships between optimism and innovative behavior: Understanding potential antecedents and mediating effects. Creativity Research Journal, 23, 119-128.

  • Lincoln, Y. S., & Guba, E. G. (1985). Naturalistic inquiry. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.

  • Mansyur, C. L., Liviatan, I., Trope, Y., & Liberman, N. (2008). Interpersonal similarity as a social distance dimension: A construal level approach to the mental representations and judgments of similar and dissimilar others’ actions. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 44, 1256-1269.

  • Lu, L., Huang, Y., & Chang, H. (2014). Confucian dynamism, the role of money and consumer ethical beliefs: An exploratory study in Taiwan. Ethics and Behavior 24, 34-52.

  • Ma, Z., Doing, W., Wu, J., Liang, D., & Yin, X. (2015). Confucian ideal personality and Chinese business negotiation styles: An indigenous perspective. Group Decision and Negotiation, 24, 383-400.

  • Marginson, S. (2011). Higher education in East Asia and Singapore: Rise of the Confucian model. Higher Education, 61, 587-611.

  • McBride, B. A., Dyer, W. J., Liu, Y., Brown, G. L., & Hong, S. (2009). The differential impact of early father and mother involvement on later student achievement. Journal of educational psychology, 101, 498-508.

  • McCabe, H. (2007). Parent advocacy in the face of adversity: Autism and families in the People’s Republic of China. Focus on Autism and Other Developmental Disabilities, 22, 39-50.

  • McCrae, R. M. (1987). Creativity, divergent thinking, and openness to experience. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 52, 1258-1265.

  • McKinley, J. (2015). Critical argument and writer identity: Social constructivism as a theoretical framework for EFL academic writing. Critical in Language Studies, 12, 184-207.

  • MacKinnon, D. W. (1962). The nature and nurture of creative talent. American Psychologist, 17, 484-495.

  • MacKinnon, D. W. (1964). Creativity and images of the self. In R. W. White (Ed.), The study of lives. New York, NY: Atherton Press.

  • MacKinnon, D. W. (1967). Assessing creative persons. Journal of Creative Behavior, 1, 291-304.

  • MacKinnon, D. W. (1975). IPAR’s contribution to the conceptualization and study of creativity. In Taylor, I. & Getzels, J. (Eds.) Perspectives in Creativity. Chicago, IL: Aldine.

  • McNeely, C. A., & Barber, B. K. (2010). How do parents make adolescents feel loved? Perspectives on supportive parenting from adolescents in 12 cultures. Journal of Adolescent Research, 25, 601-631.

  • Mehrinejad, S. A., Rajabimoghadam, S., & Tarsafi, M. (2015). The relationship between parenting styles and creativity and the predictability of creativity by parenting styles. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 205, 56-60.

  • Miller, A. L., Lambert, A. D., & Speirs Neumeister, K. L. (2012). Parenting style, perfectionism, and creativity in high-ability and high-achieving young adults. Journal for the Education of the Gifted, 35, 344-365.

  • Miron-Spektor, E., Paletz, S. B., & Lin, C. C. (2015). To create without losing face: The effects of face cultural logic and social-image affirmation on creativity. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 36, 919-943.

  • Morrison, E. W., & Milliken, F. J. (2000). Organizational silence: A barrier to change and development in a pluralistic world. Academy of Management Review, 25, 706-725.

  • Morrow, W. R., & Wilson, R. C. (1961). Family relations of bright high-achieving and under-achieving high school boys. Child Development, 32, 501-510.

  • Mozafari, S. (2014). Prediction of creativity and academic achievement based on child rearing styles. International Journal of Psychology and Behavioral Research, 3, 166-176.

  • Nouri, R., Erez, M., Lee, C., Liang, J., Bannister, B. D., & Chiu, W. (2015). Social context: Key to understanding culture’s effects on creativity. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 36, 899-918.

  • Palawat, M., & May, M. E. (2012). The impact of cultural diversity on special education provision in the United States. Journal of the International Association of Special Education, 13(1), 58-63.

  • Park, M., & Chesla, C. (2007). Revisiting Confucianism as a conceptual framework for Asian family study. Journal of Family Nursing 13, 293-311.

  • Polman, E., & Emich, K. J. (2011). Decisions for others are more creative than decisions for the self. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 37, 492-501.

  • Pellegrini, E. K., & Scandura, T. A. (2008). Paternalistic leadership: A review and agenda for future research. Journal of Management 34, 566-593.

  • Pronin, E., & Ross, L. (2006). Temporal differences in trait self ascription: When the self is seen as another. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 90, 197-209.

  • Rinne, T., Steel, G. D., & Fairweather, J. (2012) Hofstede and Shane revisited the role of power distance and individualism in national-level innovation success. Cross-Cultural Research, 46, 91-108.

  • Rinne, T., Steel, G. D., & Fairweather, J. (2013). The role of Hofstede’s individualism in national-level creativity. Creativity Research Journal, 25, 129-136.

  • Roberts, D. (2014, May). China exam system drives student suicides. Bloomberg. Retrieved from http://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2014-05-15/china-exam-system-drives-student-suicides.

  • Roe, A. (1952). The making of a scientist. New York, NY: Dodd, Mead.

  • Russ, S. W. (1993). Affect and creativity: The role of affect and play in the creative process. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum & Associates.

  • Schneider, B., & Lee, Y. (1990). A model for academic success: The school and home environment of East Asian students. Anthropology & Education Quarterly, 21, 358-377.

  • Schroth, R. A. (2012, May). The plagiarism plague. America: The national catholic weekly. Retrieved from http://www.americamagazine.org/content/article.cfm?article_id=13413

  • Steinberg, L., Dornbusch, S., & Brown, B. B. (1992). Ethnic differences in adolescent achievement: An ecological perspective. American Psychologist, 47, 723-729.

  • Sternberg, R. J., & Kaufman, J. C. (2010). Constraints on creativity. In J. C. Kaufman & R. J. Sternberg (Eds.), The Cambridge handbook of creativity (pp. 467-482). New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.

  • Suen, H. K., & Yu, L. (2006). Chronic consequences of high-stakes testing? Lessons from the Chinese civil service exam. Comparative Education Review, 50(1), 46-65.

  • Tan, P., Morgan, S., & Zagheni, E. (2016). A case for “reversed one-child” policies in Japan and South Korea? Examining the link between education costs and lowest-low fertility. Population Research and Policy Review, 35, 327-350.

  • Taylor, M. Z., & Wilson, S. (2012). Does culture still matter? The effects of individualism on national innovation rates. Journal of Business Venturing, 27, 234-247.

  • Tellis, G. J., Prabhu, J. C., & Chandy, R. K. (2009). Radical innovation across nations: The preeminence of corporate culture. Journal of Marketing, 73(1), 3-23.

  • Terman, L. M. (1954). The discovery and encouragement of exceptional talent. American Psychologist, 9, 221-230.

  • Thrash, T. M., Maruskin, L. A., Cassidy, S. E., Fryer, J. W., & Ryan, R. M. (2010). Mediating between the muse and the masses: Inspiration and the actualization of creative ideas. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 98, 469-487.

  • Torrance, E. P., & Safter, H. T. (1999). Making the creative leap beyond. Buffalo, NY: Creative Education Foundation Press.

  • Vagle, M. D. (2014). Crafting phenomenological research. Walnut Creek, CA: Left Coast Press.

  • Varsakelis, N. C. (2001). The impact of patent protection, economy openness and national culture on R&D investment: A cross-country empirical investigation. Research Policy, 30, 1059-1068.

  • Valdez, C., Shewakramani, V., Goldberg, S., & Padilla, B. (2013). Parenting influences on Latino children’s social competence in the first grade: Parental depression and parent involvement at home and school. Child Psychiatry & Human Development, 44, 646-657.

  • Wakslak, C. J., Trope, Y., Liberman, N., & Alony, R. (2006). Seeing the forest when entry is unlikely: Probability and the mental representation of events. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 135, 641-653.

  • Walsh, C. (2013). Jobs, Einstein, and Franklin: Isaacson deconstructs their genius and dedication to larger goals. Harvard Gazette. Retrieved from http://news.harvard.edu/gazette/stroy/2013/04/jobs-einstein-and-franklin/

  • Wang, L. C. (2015). The effect of high-stakes testing on suicidal ideation of teenagers with reference-dependent preferences. Journal of Population Economics, 29, 345-364.

  • Williams, P., Barclay, L., & Schmied, V. (2004). Defining social support in context: A necessary step in improving research, intervention, and practice. Qualitative Health Research, 14, 942-960.

  • Weisberg, P.S., & Springer, K. J. (1961). Environmental factors in creative functions: A study of gifted children. Archives of General Psychiatry, 5, 64-74.

  • Xu, M., Benson, S. N. K., Mudrey-Camino, R., & Steiner, R. P. (2010). The relationship between parental involvement, self-regulated learning, and reading achievement of fifth graders: A path analysis using the ECLS-K database. Social Psychology of Education, 13, 237-269.

  • Yan, M-C., Kim, S., Kang, H-J., & Wilkerson, K. L. (2017). Perceptions of disability and special education among East Asian parents. Journal of International Special Needs Education, 20(1), 41-55.

  • Yang, S., & Shin, C. S. (2008). Parental attitudes towards education: What matters for children’s well-being? Children and Youth Services Review, 30, 1328-1335.

  • Yonngong (2015). Suicide No. 1 cause of death for S. Korean teens, youths. Yonhap News Agency. Retrieved from http://english.yonhapnews.co.kr/national/2015/04/28/11/0302000000AEN20150428004700320F.html

OPEN ACCESS

Journal + Issues

Search