Does the Frequency of Using Emoticons in Computer-Mediated Communication Signal Creativity?

Open access


Nowadays many human interactions take place in the virtual environment. To express emotions and attitudes in computer-mediated communication (CMC) individuals use emoticons - graphic representations of emotions and ideas. Contemporary applications serving computer-mediated communication (CMC) are provided with a broad spectrum of emoticons which may be used in communication. Variety of emoticons gives users of CMC an opportunity to create unique messages and express emotions in a creative manner. This study involved 275 online respondents and aimed to verify whether the frequency of emoticons use may be predicted by the three characteristics of creativity (creative abilities, openness, independence). Bayesian regression analysis showed that creativity does not predict frequency of emoticons use in CMC. No correspondence between creativity and frequency of emoticons use may be explained by pragmatic function of emoticons as they are used to communicate efficiently with an emphasis on the sender-recipient shared understanding of the emoticons meaning. What is more, robust popularity of communication applications leads to widespread employment of emoticons by CMC users. Therefore, with growing number of emoticons users’ creative individuals may seek less common means of expressing own creativity.

If the inline PDF is not rendering correctly, you can download the PDF file here.

  • Baas M. De Dreu C. K. & Nijstad B. A. (2008). A meta-analysis of 25 years of mood-creativity research: Hedonic tone activation or regulatory focus?. Psychological Bulletin 134(6) 779-806.

  • Baron N. S. (2004). See you online: Gender issues in college student use of instant messaging. Journal of Language and Social Psychology23(4) 397-423.

  • Boldea O. & Norley N. (2008). Emoticons and their role in computer-mediated communication. Journal of Linguistic Studies1(1) 43-46.

  • Carter K. A. (2003). Type me how you feel: Quasi-nonverbal cues in computer-mediated communication. Journal of Language and Social Psychology 60(1) 29-39.

  • Carter R. (2002). A response to Neal R. Norrick. Connotations 11(2-3) 291–297.

  • Conner T. S. & Silvia P. J. (2015). Creative days: A daily diary study of emotion personality and everyday creativity. Psychology of Aesthetics Creativity and the Arts 9(4) 463-470.

  • Daisley M. (1994). The game of literacy: The meaning of Play in computer-mediated communication. Computers and Composition 11(2) 107–119.

  • Danet B. Ruedenberg L. Gurion B. & Rosenbaum-Tamari Y. (1997). ‘Hmmm Where’s that smoke coming from?’ Writing play and performance on Internet Relay Chat. In F. Sudweeks M. McLaughlin & S. Rafaeli (Eds.) Network and netplay: Virtual groups on the internet. Cambridge. MA: MIT Press

  • del-Teso-Craviotto M. (2006). Language and sexuality in Spanish and English dating chats. Journal of Sociolinguistics 10(4) 460–480.

  • Derks D. Bos A. E. & Von Grumbkow J. (2008a). Emoticons and online message interpretation. Social Science Computer Review26(3) 379-388.

  • Derks D. Bos A. E. & Von Grumbkow J. (2008b). Emoticons in computer-mediated communication: Social motives and social context. CyberPsychology & Behavior 11 (1) 99-101.

  • Dresner E. & Herring S. C. (2010). Functions of the nonverbal in CMC: Emoticons and illocutionary force. Communication Theory20(3) 249-268.

  • Dziedziewicz D. & Karwowski M. (2015). Development of children’s creative visual imagination: A theoretical model and enhancement programmes. Education 3-13 43(4) 382-392.

  • Fabri M. Moore D. J. & Hobbs D. J. (2005 September). Empathy and enjoyment in instant messaging. In Proceedings of 19th British HCI group annual conference (HCI2005) Edinburgh UK (pp. 4-9).

  • Feist G. J. (1998). A meta-analysis of personality in scientific and artistic creativity. Personality and Social Psychology Review 2(4) 290-309.

  • Garrison A. Remley D. Thomas P. & Wierszewski E. (2011). Conventional faces: Emoticons in instant messaging discourse. Computers and Composition 28 112-125.

  • Hogenboom A. Bal D. Frasincar F. Bal M. de Jong F. & Kaymak U. (2013 March). Exploiting emoticons in sentiment analysis. In: Proceedings of the 28th annual ACM symposium on applied computing (pp. 703-710). ACM

  • Hsieh S. H. & Tseng T. H. (2017). Playfulness in mobile instant messaging: Examining the influence of emoticons and text messaging on social interaction. Computers in Human Behavior69 405-414.

  • Huang A. H. Yen D. C. & Zhang X. (2008). Exploring the potential effects of emoticons. Information & Management45(7) 466-473.

  • Jankowska D. M. & Karwowski M. (2015). Measuring creative imagery abilities. Frontiers in Psychology6 1591.

  • Jankowska D. M. Omelańczuk I. Czerwonka M. & Karwowski M. (2019). Exploring links between creative abilities creative personality and subclinical autistic traits. Personality and Individual Differences 142 226–231.

  • Karwowski M. (2017). Subordinated and Rebellious Creativity at School. In R. A. Beghetto & B. Sriraman (Eds.) Creative Contradictions in Education. Cross Disciplinary Paradoxes and Perspectives (pp. 89–115). Springer

  • Karwowski M. & Jankowska D. M. (2016). Four Faces of Creativity at School. In R. A. Beghetto & J. C. Kaufman (Eds.) Nurturing Creativity in the Classroom (pp. 337–354). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

  • Karwowski M. & Lebuda I. (2016). The big five the huge two and creative self-beliefs: A meta-analysis. Psychology of Aesthetics Creativity and the Arts 10(2) 214–232.

  • Kato S. Kato Y. & Scott D. (2009). Relationships between emotional states and emoticons in mobile phone email communication in Japan. International Journal on E-learning8(3) 385-401.

  • Li D. Chau P. Y. K. & Lou H. (2005). Understanding individual adoption of instant messaging: An empirical investigation. Journal of the Association for Information Systems 6(4) 102–129.

  • Lo S. K. (2008). The nonverbal communication functions of emoticons in computer-mediated communication. CyberPsychology & Behavior11(5) 595-597.

  • Luor T. T. Wu L. L. Lu H. P. & Tao Y. H. (2010). The effect of emoticons in simplex and complex task-oriented communication: An empirical study of instant messaging. Computers in Human Behavior 26(5) 889-895.

  • North S. (2007). ‘The voices the voices’: Creativity in online conversation. Applied linguistics28(4) 538-555.

  • Novak P. K. Smailović J. Sluban B. & Mozetič I. (2015). Sentiment of emojis. PloS one 10(12).

  • Oleszkiewicz A. Frackowiak T. Sorokowska A. & Sorokowski P. (2017a). Children can accurately recognize facial emotions from emoticons. Computers in Human Behavior76 372-377.

  • Oleszkiewicz A. Karwowski M. Pisanski K. Sorokowski P. Sobrado B. & Sorokowska A. (2017b). Who uses emoticons? Data from 86 702 Facebook users. Personality and Individual Differences119 289-295.

  • Oum S. & Han D. (2011). An empirical study of the determinants of the intention to participate in user-created contents (UCC) services. Expert Systems with Applications 38(12) 15110-15121.

  • Pavalanathan U. & Eisenstein J. (2016). More emojis less:) The competition for para-linguistic function in microblog writing. First Monday21(11). Pavalanathan

  • Pool C. & Nissim M. (2016). Distant supervision for emotion detection using Facebook reactions. arXiv preprint arXiv:1611.02988.

  • Prada M. Rodrigues D. L. Garrido M. V. Lopes D. Cavalheiro B. & Gaspar R. (2018). Motives frequency and attitudes toward emoji and emoticon use. Telematics and Informatics35(7) 1925-1934.

  • Preece J. & Ghozati K. (2001). Experiencing empathy online. The Internet and health communication: Experiences and expectations 147-166.

  • Rezabeck L. L. & Cochenour J. J. (1995). Emoticons: Visual cues for computer-mediated communication. In: Imagery and visual literacy: Selected readings from the Annual Conference of the International Visual Literacy Association (26th Tempe Arizona October 12–16).

  • Rosen L. D. Chang J. Erwin L. Carrier L. M. & Cheever N. A. (2010). The relationship between “textisms” and formal and informal writing among young adults. Communication Research37(3) 420-440.

  • Settanni M. & Marengo D. (2015). Sharing feelings online: studying emotional well-being via automated text analysis of Facebook posts. Frontiers in Psychology6 1045.

  • Silvia P. J. Beaty R. E. Nusbaum E. C. Eddington K. M. Levin-Aspenson H. & Kwapil T. R. (2014). Everyday creativity in daily life: An experience-sampling study of “little c” creativity. Psychology of Aesthetics Creativity and the Arts 8(2) 183-188.

  • Spinuzzi C. (1992). Emoticons and non-verbal communication on the USENET. Unpublished study provided on an internet posting.

  • Taiwo R. (2010). The thumb tribe: Creativity and social change through SMS in Nigeria. California Linguistic Notes 35(1) 1-17.

  • Thompson D. & Filik R. (2016). Sarcasm in written communication: Emoticons are efficient markers of intention. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication21(2) 105-120.

  • Tossell C. C. Kortum P. Shepard C. Barg-Walkow L. H. Rahmati A. & Zhong L. (2012). A longitudinal study of emoticon use in text messaging from smartphones. Computers in Human Behavior 28(2) 659-663.

  • Urban K. K. (2005). Assessing creativity: The Test for Creative Thinking-Drawing Production (TCT-DP). International Education Journal6(2) 272–280.

  • Voss J. F. & Means M. L. (1989). Toward a model of creativity based upon problem solving in the social sciences. In J. A. Glover R. R. Ronning & C. R. Ronning (Eds.) Handbook of creativity (pp. 399–410). New York: Plenum Press.

  • Vygotsky L. S. (2004). Imagination and creativity in childhood. Journal of Russian & East European Psychology 42(1) 7-97.

  • Walther J. B. & D’Addario K. P. (2001). The impacts of emoticons on message interpretation in computer-mediated communication. Social Science Computer Review19 (3) 324-347.

  • Weisfeld G. E. (2006). Humor appreciation as an adaptive esthetic emotion. Humor 19 (1) 1–26.

  • Wolf A. (2000). Emotional expression online: Gender differences in emoticon use. CyberPsychology & Behavior3(5) 827-833.

  • Zaman M. Anandarajan M. & Dai Q. (2010). Experiencing flow with instant messaging and its facilitating role on creative behaviors. Computers in Human Behavior 26(5) 1009–1018.

Journal information
All Time Past Year Past 30 Days
Abstract Views 0 0 0
Full Text Views 130 130 8
PDF Downloads 105 105 2