Relationships Between Creativity and its Antecedents Before and After Training: The Role of Risk-Taking and Past Creative Experience

Open access


This research examined the effects of past creative experience and attitude toward risk-taking on creativity before and after training. College students enrolled in a creativity course participated in the study. Creativity was assessed by independent experts and self-assessed by the participants. Based on the results, an inverted U-shape relationship was proposed between (a) past creative experience and risk-taking, and (b) risk-taking and self-assessed creativity. Risk-taking was related to self-assessed creativity before and after the training, but not expert-assessed creativity. Past creative experience was not related to creativity, self and expert-assessed, before and after the training.

If the inline PDF is not rendering correctly, you can download the PDF file here.

  • Amabile T. M. (1982). Personality processes and individual differences. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 42(5) 997-1013.

  • Amabile T. M. (1996). Creativity in context. Boulder CO: Westview Press.

  • Amabile T. M. & Gryskiewicz S. S. (1987). Creativity in the R&D laboratory. Greensboro NC: Center for Creative Leadership.

  • Audia P. G. & Goncalo J. A. (2007). Past success and creativity over time: A study of inventors in the hard disk drive industry. Management Science 53(1) 1-15.

  • Bandura A. (1997). Self-Efficacy: The Exercise of Control. New York NY: Freeman and Company.

  • Batey M. (2007). A psychometric investigation of everyday creativity (Unpublished doctoral thesis). London: University College London.

  • Beghetto R. A. Kaufman J. C. & Baxter J. (2011). Answering the unexpected questions: Exploring the relationship between students’ creative self-efficacy and teacher ratings of creativity. Psychology of Aesthetics Creativity and the Arts 5(4) 342-349.

  • Bentler P. M. & Bonnet D. G. (1980). Significance tests and goodness of fit in the analysis of covariance structures. Psychological Bulletin 88 588-606.

  • Carpenter M.A. Pollock T.G. & Leary M.M. (2003). Testing a model of reasoned risktaking: governance the experience of principals and agents and global strategy in high-technology IPO firms. Strategic Management Journal 24 803-820.

  • Chang S. J. Van Witteloostuijn A. & Eden L. (2010). From the editors: Common method variance in international business research. Journal of International Business Studies 41 178-184.

  • Cropley A. J. (2000). Defining and measuring creativity: Are creativity tests worth using? Roeper Review 23(2) 72-79.

  • Das S. R. & Joshi M. P. (2007). Process innovativeness in technology services organizations: Roles of differentiation strategy operational autonomy and risk-taking propensity. Journal of Operations Management 25 643-660.

  • Denrell J. (2007). Adaptive learning and risk taking. Psychological Review 114 177-187.

  • Dewett T. (2006). Exploring the role of risk in employee creativity. The Journal of Creative Behavior 40(1) 27-45.

  • Dewett T. (2007). Linking intrinsic motivation risk taking and employee creativity in an R&D environment. R&D Management 37 197-208.

  • Dragseth D. (2007). Should I stay or should I go? A study of risk-taking propensity creativity and exit intent of North Dakota college seniors in business. Unpublished dissertation UMI No. 3252821.

  • Eisenman R. (1987). Creativity birth order and risk taking. Bulletin of the Psychonomic Society 25(2) 87-88.

  • Epstein R. Schmidt S. M. & Warfel R. (2008). Measuring and Training Creativity Competencies: Validation of a New Test. Creativity Research Journal 20(1) 7-12.

  • Furnham A. Batey M. Anand K. & Manfield J. (2008). Personality hypomania intelligence and creativity. Personality and Individual Differences 44 1060−1069.

  • Garvis S. & Pendergast D. (2013). An investigation of early childhood teacher selfefficacybeliefs in the teaching of arts education. International Journal of Education & The Arts 12(9) 1-15.

  • Glover J. A. & Gray A. L. (1975). Behavior modification: enhancing creativity and other good behaviors. Pacific Grove CA: Boxwood Press.

  • Graham J. R. (1999). Herding among Investment Newsletters: Theory and Evidence. The Journal of Finance 54 237-268.

  • Guadagno R. (2010). Writing up your results - Guidelines based on APA style. Retrieved from

  • Guilford J. P. (1959). Traits of creativity. In H. H. Anderson & M. S. Anderson (Eds.) Creativity and its cultivation addresses presented at the interdisciplinary symposia on creativity. (pp. 142-161). New York: Harper.

  • Hocevar D. (1981). Measurement of creativity: Review and critique. Journal of Personality Assessment 45 450-464.

  • Hong H. Kubik J.D. Solomon A. (2000). Security analysts’ career concerns and herding of earnings forecasts. RAND Journal of Economics 31 121-144.

  • Karwowski M. (2015). Notes on creative potential and its measurement. Creativity. Theory-Research-Applications 2(1) 4-16.

  • Kim K. H. Cramond B. & Bandalos D. L. (2006). The latent structure and measurement invariance of scores on the Torrance Tests of Creative Thinking-Figural. Educational and Psychological Measurement 66(3) 459-477.

  • March J. G. (1996). Learning to be risk averse. Psychological Review 103(2) 309-319.

  • Michalko M. (2006). Thinkertoys: A Handbook of Creative-Thinking Techniques. Berkley CA: Ten Speed Press.

  • Moran S. & John-Steiner V. (2003). Creativity in the making: Vygotsky’s contemporary contribution to the dialectic of development and creativity. In R. K. Sawyer V. John-Steiner S. Moran R. J. Sternberg D. H. Feldman J. Nakamura & M. Csikszentmihalyi (Eds.). Creativity and development. (pp. 61-90). New York: Oxford University Press.

  • Mumford M.D. & Gustafson S.B. (1988). Creativity syndrome: integration application and innovation. Psychological Bulletin 103(1) 27-43.

  • Pauole K. Madole K. Garhammer J. Lacourse M. & Rozenek R. (2000). Reliability and validity of the T-test as a measure of agility leg power and leg speed in collegeaged men and women. Journal of Strength and Conditioning Research 14 443-450.

  • Reiter-Palmon R. Robinso-Morral E.J. Kaufman J. C. & Santo J. B. (2012). Evaluation of self-perceptions of creativity: is it a useful criterion? Creativity Research Journal 24(2-3) 107-114.

  • Russ S. W. (1993). Affect and creativity: The role of affect and play in the creative process. Hillsdale NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.

  • Saeki N. Fan X. & Dusen L. (2001). A comparative study of creative thinking of American and Japanese college students. The Journal of Creative Behavior 35(1) 24-36.

  • Sitkin S. B. & Pablo A. L. (1992). Reconceptualizing the determinants of risk behavior. Academy of Management Review 17(1) 9-38.

  • Sternberg R. J. & Lubart T. I. (1992). Buy low and sell high: An investment approach to creativity. Current Directions in Psychological Science 1(1) 1-5.

  • Sternberg R. O'Hara L. A. & Lubart T. (1997). Creativity as investment. California Management Review 40(1) 8-21.

  • Suh T. Bae M. Zhao H. Kim S. H. & Arnold M. J. (2010). A multi-level investigation of international marketing projects: The roles of experiential knowledge and creativity on performance. Industrial Marketing Management 39 211-220.

  • Taylor A. & Greve H. R. (2006). Superman or the fantastic four? Knowledge combination and experience in innovation teams. The Academy of Management Journal 9 723-740.

  • Tierney P. & Farmer S. M. (2002). Creative Self-Efficacy: Its potential antecedents and relationship to creative performance. The Academy of Management Journal 45 1137-1148.

  • Torrance E.P. (2008). Torrance Tests of Creative Thinking: Norms-technical manual verbal forms A and B. Bensenville IL: Scholastic Testing Service.

  • Vygotsky L.S. (1978). Mind and Society. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.

Journal information
All Time Past Year Past 30 Days
Abstract Views 0 0 0
Full Text Views 359 88 3
PDF Downloads 148 53 4