Overcoming Impasses in Conversations: A Creative Business


The ability to communicate complex meanings is a specific human ability which plays a crucial role in social interactions. A habitual example of these interactions is conversation. However, we observe that spontaneous conversation often hits an impasse when none of the interlocutors immediately produces a follow-up utterance. The existence of impasses in conversations, and the way that interlocutors overcome them provide evidence for our argument that conversation is a sequence of creative problem solving. In this work we use techniques from Conversation Analysis (CA) on publicly available databases of naturally-occurring speech and we suggest a framework to understand how impasses are reached and overcome. As a result, we hope to reveal yet another instance of the bond between language and creativity.

If the inline PDF is not rendering correctly, you can download the PDF file here.

  • Amabile, T. M. (1983). The social psychology of creativity: a componential conceptualization. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 45(2), 357-376.

  • Austin, J. L. (1975). How to do things with words. Oxford University Press.

  • Beeftink, F., Van Eerde, W., & Rutte, C. G. (2008). The effect of interruptions and breaks on insight and impasses: do you need a break right now? Creativity Research Journal, 20(4), 358-364.

  • Boden, M. A. (2004). The Creative Mind: Myths and Mechanisms (2nd edition). Routledge.

  • Boersma, P. & Weenink, D. (2010). Praat: doing Phonetics by computer.

  • Bowden, E. M. & Jung-Beeman, M. (2006). Methods for investigating the neural components of insight. Methods, 42, 87-99. doi:doi:10.1016/j.ymeth.2006.11.007

  • Canavan, A., Graff, D., & Zipperlen, G. (1997). Callhome American English speech. Linguistic Data Consortium.

  • Chambliss, C. A. & Feeny, N. (1992). Effects of sex of subject, sex of interrupter, and topic of conversation on the perceptions of interruptions. Perceptual and Motor Skills, 75(3f), 1235-1241.

  • Clark, H. H. (1996). Using language. Cambridge University Press.

  • Cranford, E. A. & Moss, J. (2012). Is insight always the same? a protocol analysis of insight in compound remote associative problems. The Journal of Problem Solving, 4. doi:10.7771/1932-6246.1129

  • Cummins, F., Li, C., & Wang, B. (2013). Coupling among speakers during synchronous speaking in English and Mandarin. Journal of Phonetics, 41(6), 432-441.

  • de Jong, N. H. & Wempe, T. (2009, May). Praat script to detect syllable nuclei and measure speech rate automatically. Behavior Research Methods, 41(2), 385-390. doi:10.3758/BRM.41.2.385

  • Demuth, C. & Glaveanu, V. P. (2016). Creativity - A New Vocabulary. In V. P. Glaveanu, L. Tanggaard, & C. Wegener (Eds.), (Chap. Language, pp. 52-60). Palgrave Macmillan. doi:10.1057/9781137511805

  • Donaldson, S. K. (1979). One kind of speech act: How do we know when we’re conversing? Semiotica, 28(3-4), 259-300.

  • Fischer, G., Giaccardi, E., Eden, H., Sugimoto, M., & Ye, Y. (2005). Beyond binary choices: Integrating individual and social creativity. International Journal of Human Computer Studies, 63, 482-512. doi:10.1016/j.ijhcs.2005.04.014

  • Fleck, J. I. & Weisberg, R. W. (2013). Insight versus analysis: Evidence for diverse methods in problem solving. Journal of Cognitive Psychology, 25, 436-463. doi:10.1080/20445911.2013.779248

  • Gilhooly, K. J., Fioratou, E., Anthony, S. H., & Wynn, V. (2007). Divergent thinking: Strategies and executive involvement in generating novel uses for familiar objects. British Journal of Psychology, 98, 611-625. doi:10.1348/096317907X173421

  • Grice, H. P. (1957). Meaning. The Philosophical Review, 377-388.

  • Grice, H. P. (1975). Syntax and semantics: Speech acts Volume 3. In P. Cole & J. L. Morgan (Eds.), (Chap. Logic and conversation. pp. 41-58). New York: Academic Press.

  • Guilford, J. P. (1967). The Nature of Human Intelligence. McGraw-Hill.

  • Halliday, M. A. K. (1994). An Introduction to Functional Grammar. London: Edward Arnold.

  • Hocevar, D. (1979). Ideational Fluency as a Confounding Factor in the Measurement of Originality. Journal of Educational Psychology, 71(2), 191-196.

  • Howard, T., Culley, S., & Dekoninck, E. (2007). Creativity in the Engineering Design Process. In International conference of engineering design.

  • Jacewicz, E., Fox, R. A., O’Neill, C., & Salmons, J. (2009, July). Articulation rate across dialect, age, and gender. Language Variation and Change, 21(02), 233-256. doi:10.1017/s0954394509990093

  • Jefferson, G. (2004). Conversation analysis: studies from the first generation. In G. H. Lerner (Ed.), (Chap. Glossary of transcript symbols with an introduction, pp. 13-31). John Benjamins Publishing.

  • Jordan, M. E., Lanham, H. J., Crabtree, B. F., Nutting, P. A., Miller, W. L., Stange, K. C., & McDaniel, R. R. (2009). The role of conversation in health care interventions: Enabling sensemaking and learning. Implement Sci, 4(15), 1-13.

  • Kaplan, M. A. (1997). Learning to converse in a foreign language: The reception game. Simulation & Gaming, 28(2), 149-163.

  • Kaufman, J. C. & Beghetto, R. A. (2013). Do people recognize the four Cs? Examining layperson conceptions of creativity. Psychology of Aesthetics, Creativity, and the Arts, 7(3), 229-236. doi:10.1037/a0033295

  • Lerner, G. H. (2004). Conversation analysis: Studies from the first generation. John Benjamins Publishing.

  • MacWhinney, B. (2007). The Talkbank Project. In Creating and Digitizing Language Corpora (pp. 163-180). Springer.

  • McCarthy, M. (2001). The Cambridge Guide to Teaching English to Speakers of Other Languages. In D. Nunan & R. Carter (Eds.), (Chap. Discourse, pp. 48-55). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

  • Moss, J., Kotovsky, K., & Cagan, J. (2011). The effect of incidental hints when problems are suspended before, during, or after an impasse. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory and Cognition, 37(1), 140-148. doi:10.1037/a0021206

  • Newell, A. & Simon, H. A. (1972). Human Problem Solving. Prentice-Hall International, Inc.

  • Ohlsson, S. (2011). Deep Learning: How the Mind Overrides Experience. Cambridge University Press.

  • Öllinger, M., Jones, G., & Knoblich, G. (2014). The dynamics of search, impasse, and representational change provide a coherent explanation of difficulty in the ninedot problem. Psychological Research, 78(2), 266-275.

  • Park, I. (2010). Marking an impasse: The use of anyway as a sequence-closing device. Journal of Pragmatics, 42. doi:10.1016/j.pragma.2010.06.002

  • Reed, S. K. (2015). The Structure of Ill-Structured (and Well-Structured) Problems Revisited. Educational Psychology Review, 1-26. doi:10.1007/s10648-0159343-1

  • Runco, M. A. & Jaeger, G. J. (2012). The Standard Definition of Creativity. Creativity Research Journal, 24(1), 92-96. doi:10.1080/10400419.2012.650092

  • Sacks, H. (1992). Lectures on Conversation, Volumes I and II (G. Jefferson, Ed.). Oxford: Basil Blackwell.

  • Sacks, H., Schegloff, E. A., & Jefferson, G. (1974). A simplest systematics for the organization of turntaking for conversation. Language, 696-735.

  • Salvi, C., Bricolo, E., Kounios, J., Bowden, E., & Beeman, M. (2016). Insight solutions are correct more often than analytic solutions. Thinking & Reasoning. doi:10.1080/13546783.2016.1141798

  • Schegloff, E. A. (2007). Sequence organization in interaction: Volume 1: A primer in conversation analysis. Cambridge University Press.

  • Searle, J. R. (1969). Speech acts: An essay in the philosophy of language. Cambridge University Press.

  • Selting, M. (1996). On the interplay of syntax and prosody in the constitution of turn-constructional units and turns in conversation. Pragmatics, 6, 371-388.

  • Silvia, P. J., Winterstein, B. P., Willse, J. T., Barona, C. M., Cram, J. T., Hess, K. I., ... Richard, C. A. (2008). Assessing creativity with divergent thinking tasks: Exploring the reliability and validity of new subjective scoring methods. Psychology of Aesthetics, Creativity, and the Arts, 2(2), 68-85. doi:doi:10.1037/1931-3896.2.2.68

  • Simon, H. A. (1973). The Structure of Ill Structured Problems. Artificial Intelligence, 4, 181-201.

  • Stein, M. I. (1953). Creativity and Culture. The Journal of Psychology: Interdisciplinary and Applied, 36(2), 311-322. doi:10.1080/00223980.1953.9712897

  • Stivers, T., Enfield, N. J., Brown, P., Englert, C., Hayashi, M., Heinemann, T., ... Yoon, K.-E., et al. (2009). Universals and cultural variation in turn-taking in conversation. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 106(26), 10587-10592.

  • Wallach, M. A. & Kogan, N. (1965). Modes of Thinking in Young Children. A Study of the Creativity-Intelligence distinction. Holt, Rinehart, and Winston, Inc.

  • Wallas, G. (1926). The Art of Thought. Jonathan Cape London.

  • Warren, M. (2006). Features of Naturalness in Conversation. Pragmatics & Beyond New Series. John Benjamins Publishing. doi:10.1075/pbns.152

  • Weisberg, R. W. (2015). Toward an integrated theory of insight in problem solving. Thinking & Reasoning, 21(1), 5-39. doi:10.1080/13546783.2014.886625


Journal + Issues