Space understood as physical environment is the object of research in many fields, including social sciences. Previous studies point to the importance it may have for creative activity. School is one of the spaces where creative activity takes place. School is also supposed to support the development of students’ creativity. The article presents research on school as a physical environment facilitating creativity. The main aim of the presented study was to identify the characteristics of schools that students evaluated as favourable and unfavourable to their creative activity. The following research questions were addressed: What features of school space are evaluated by students as favourable to their creative activity? What features of school space are evaluated by students as unfavourable to their creative activity? The research made it possible to identify the elements of school that students see as support for, or hindrance to, their creative activity.
If the inline PDF is not rendering correctly, you can download the PDF file here.
Addison N. Burgess L. Steers J. &Trowell J. (2010). Understanding art education: Engaging reflexively with practice. London: Routledge.
Amabile T. M. (1989). Growing up creative. Nurturing a lifetime of creativity. Buffalo-New York: C.E.F. Press.
Bancroft S. Fawcett M. & Hay P. (2008). Researching children researching the world: 5×5×5 = creativity. Trentham: Stoke-on-Trent.
Brown J. Cooper-Kuhn Ch. M. Kempermann G. Van Praag H. Winkler J. Gage F. H. & Kuhn H. G. (2003). Enriched environment and physical activity stimulate hippocampal but not olfactory bulb neurogenesis. European Journal of Neuroscience 17 2042-2046.
Center for Civic Education (CEO) (2016). EDUSPACES21. Retrieved March 21 2016 from www.eduspaces.eu/p/about.html.
Davies D. Jindal-Snape D. Collier C. Digby R. Hay P.& Howe A. (2013). Creative learning environments in education:A systematic literature review. Thinking Skills and Creativity 8 80-91.
Dewey J. (2010). School and society: Being three lectures. Eastford: Martino Fine Books.
Dul J. Ceylan C. & Jaspers F. (2011). Knowledge workers’ creativity and the role of the physical work environment. Human Resource Management 50(6) 715. Retrieved.
Gandini L. Hill L. Cadwell L. & Schwall C. (Eds.). (2005). In the spirit of the studio: Learning from the atelier of Reggio Emilia. New York: Teachers’ College Press.
Gibbs G. (2007). Analyzing qualitative data.London Los Angeles New Delhi Singapore Washington D.C.: SAGE.
Glaveanu V. P. (2013). Rewriting the language of creativity: The five A’s framework. Review of General Psychology 1769-81.
Jeffrey B. (2006). Creative teaching and learning: Towards a common discourse and practice. Cambridge Journal of Education 36(3) 399-414.
Loi D. & Dillon P. (2006). Adaptive educational environments as creative spaces. Cambridge Journal of Education 36(3) 363-381.
McCoy J. M. & Evans G. W. (2002). The potential role of the physical environment in fostering creativity. Creativity Research Journal 14(3&4) 409-426.
McCoy M. (2005). Linking the physical work environment to creative context. Journal of Creative Behavior 39(3) 169-191.
Mendel M. (Ed.) (2006). Pedagogika miejsca [The pedagogy of place]. Wrocław: DSWE TWP.
Nalaskowski A. (2002). Przestrzenie i miejsca szkoły [Spaces and places of school]. Kraków: Impuls.
Nowotniak J. (2006). Kulturowy wymiar przestrzeni edukacyjnej: studium dwóch szkół. [Cultural aspects of educational space. A case study of two schools]. Szczecin: Print Group Daniel Krzanowski.
Paris C. Edwards N. Sheffield E. Mutinsky M. Olexa T. Reilly S. & Baer J. (2006). How early school experiences impact creativity. An ecological perspective. In J. C. Kaufman & J. Baer (Eds.) Creativity and reason in cognitive development. Cambridge New York Melbourne Madrid Cape Town Singapore Sao Paulo: Cambridge University Press.
Steidle A. & Werth L. (2013). Freedom from constraints: Darkness and dim illumination promote creativity. Journal of Environmental Psychology 35 67-80.