Slumps and Jumps: Another Look at Developmental Changes in Creative Abilities

Open access


The aim of this study is the analysis of creativity changes across life, particularly the widely discussed crisis periods in the development of creative abilities. A large and diversified sample of Poles (N = 4898 aged from 4 to 21 years), at each educational stage of the Polish education system, from pre-schoolers, through primary school students, middle-school students, secondary-school students and finally university students completed the Test for Creative Thinking – Drawing Production. The observed changes showed a nonlinear pattern in the development of creativity with diverse declines and increases in creative abilities. These trends are different for each of the assessment criteria of the TCT-DP and at least three different trajectories were identified. The adolescent slump was confirmed for three of the 14 assessment criteria as well as the total TCT-DP score. What was not noted however was: a slump caused by entry into formal schooling, (age 6 vs 7), 4th grade slump, (age 9 vs 10) and 6th grade slump (age 11 vs 12). We discuss possible reasons for and consequences of the findings.

If the inline PDF is not rendering correctly, you can download the PDF file here.

  • Alfonso-Benlliure V. & Santos M. R. (2016). Creativity development trajectories in Elementary Education: Differences in divergent and evaluative skills. Thinking Skills and Creativity 19 160-174.

  • Alpaugh P. K. Parham I. A. Cole K. D. & Birren J. E. (1982). Creativity in adulthood and old age: An exploratory study. Educational Gerontology 8 101-116.

  • Ayman-Nolley S. (1992). Vygotsky's perspective on the development of imagination and creativity Creativity Research Journal5(11) 77-85.

  • Barbot B. & Heuser B. (in press). Creativity and the Identity Formation in Adolescence: a Developmental Perspective. In. Karwowski M. & Kaufman J. C. (Eds.) Creativity and the Self. Academic Press

  • Barbot B. & Tinio P. P. L. (2015). Where is the “g” in creativity? A specialization - differentiation hypothesis. Frontiers of Human Neuroscience 8 1041. doi: 10.3389/fnhum.2014.01041.

  • Barbot B. Lubart T. I. & Besançon M. (2016). “Peaks slumps and bumps”: Individual differences in the development of creativity in children and adolescents. In B. Barbot (Ed.) Perspectives on creativity development. New Directions for Child and Adolescent Development151 27-39.

  • Benedek M. Jauk E. Fink A. Koschutnig K. Reishofer G. Ebner F. & Neubauer A. C. (2013). To create or to recall? Neural mechanisms underlying the generation of creative new ideas. NeuroImage88 125-133.

  • Besançon M. & Lubart T. I. (2008). Differences in the development of creative competencies in children schooled in diverse learning environments. Learning and Individual Difference18 381-389.

  • Blakemore S. J. Choudhury S. (2006). Development of the adolescent brain: implications for executive function and social cognition. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry 47(3/4) 296-312

  • Camp G. C. (1994). A longitudinal study of correlates of creativity. Creativity Research Journal7 125-144.

  • Chae S. (2003). Adaptation of a picture-type creativity test for pre-school children. Language Testing2 178-188.

  • Charles R. E. & Runco M. A. (2000-2001). Developmental trends in the evaluative and divergent thinking of children. Creativity Research Journal 13(3&4) 417-437.

  • Cheung P. C. Lau S. Chan D. W. & Wu W. Y. H. (2004). Creative potential of school children in Hong Kong: Norms of the Wallach-Kogan Creativity Tests and their implications. Creativity Research Journal16(1) 69-78.

  • Claxton A. F. Pannells T. C. & Rhoads P. A. (2005). Developmental trends in the creativity of school-age children. Creativity Research Journal 17(4) 327-335.

  • Fearon D. D. Copeland D. & Saxon T. F. (2013). The Relationship Between Parenting Styles and Creativity in a Sample of Jamaican Children. Creativity Research Journal 25 1 119-128 DOI:10.1080/10400419.2013.752287.

  • Cropley A. J. (2001). Creativity in education and learning. a guide for teachers and educators. London: Kogan Page.

  • Dahlman S. Bäckström P. Bohlin G. Frans Ö. (2013). Cognitive abilities of street children: low-SES Bolivian boys with and without experience of living in the street. Child Neuropsychology 19 5 540–556

  • Daugherty M. (1993). Creativity and private speech: Developmental trends. Creativity Research Journal 6 287–296.

  • Diamond A. (2002). Normal development of prefrontal cortex from birth to young adulthood: Cognitive functions. anatomy. and biochemistry. In D.T. Stuss & R.T. Knight (Eds.) Principles of frontal lobe function (pp. 466-503). London. UK: Oxford University Press.

  • Diamond A. (2002). Normal development of prefrontal cortex from birth to young adulthood: Cognitive functions. anatomy. and biochemistry. In D.T. Stuss & R.T. Knight (Eds.) Principles of frontal lobe function (pp. 466-503). London. UK: Oxford University Press.

  • Dietrich A. (2004). The cognitive neuroscience of creativity. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review 11 1011-1026.

  • Dollinger S. J. Dollinger S. M. C. & Centeno L. (2005). Identity and creativity. Identity: An International Journal of Theory and Research5 (4) 315-339.

  • Erikson E. H. (1959). Identity and the Life Cycle. New York: International Universities Press.

  • Erikson E. H. (1968). Identity – youth and crisis. New York: Norton

  • Gardner H. (1982). Art. mind. and brain: A cognitive approach to creativity. New York: Basic Books

  • Gralewski J. & Karwowski M. (2012). Creativity and school grades: A case from Poland. Thinking Skills and Creativity 7 198-208.

  • Gralewski J. & Karwowski M. (2013). Polite girls and creative boys? Students' gender moderates accuracy of teachers' ratings of creativity. Journal of Creative Behavior 47(4) 290-304.

  • Gralewski J. & Karwowski M. (2016 in press). Are teachers’ implicit theories of creativity related to the recognition of their students’ creativity? The Journal of Creative Behavior Vol. 0 Iss. 0 pp. 1-17 DOI: 10.1002/jocb.140

  • Guilford J. P. (1967). The nature of human intelligence. New York: McGraw-Hill.

  • Hassler M. & Nieschlag E. (1989). Masculinity femininity and musical composition psychological and psychoendocrinological aspects of musical and spatial faculties. Archives of Psychology 141(1) 71-84.

  • He W. & Wong W. (2015 in press) Creativity slump and school transition stress: A sequential study from the perspective of the cognitive-relational theory of stress. Learning and Individual Differences.

  • Jaarsveld S. Lachmann T. & van Leeuwen C. (2012). Creative reasoning across developmental levels: Convergence and divergence in problem creation. Intelligence 40 172-188.

  • Jastrzębska D. Limont W. (2015 July). Cross-sectional of Creative Abilities of Polish students from 7 to 18. Poster session presented at the Excellence and Innovation in Education: The Creativity - Innovation Challenge ICIE Jagiellonian University Conference Kraków Poland.

  • Karwowski M. (2015). Development of the Creative Self-Concept. Creativity. Theories - Research 2 2 165-179.

  • Karwowski M. & Lebuda I. (in press). Written on the Writer’s Face: Facial Width-to-Height Ratio among Nominees and Laureates of the Nobel Prize in Literature. Creativity Research Journal.

  • Karwowski M. & Lebuda I. (2014). Digit ratio predicts eminence of Polish actors. Personality and Individual Differences64 30-34.

  • Kim K. H. (2011). The creativity crisis: The decrease in creative thinking scores on the Torrance Tests of Creative Thinking. Creativity Research Journal23(4) 285-295.

  • Kleibeuker S. W. de Dreu C. K. W. & Crone E. A. (2013). The development of creative cognition across adolescence: Distinct trajectories for insight and divergent thinking. Developmental Science 16 2-12.

  • Kohlberg L. (1981). The Philosophy of Moral Development: Moral Stages and the Idea of Justice. San Francisco: Harper & Row.

  • Krampen G. (2012). Cross-sequential results on creativity development in childhood within two different school systems: Divergent performances in Luxemburg versus German kindergarten and elementary school students. Europe's Journal of Psychology8(3) 423-448.

  • Lau S. & Cheung P. C. (2010). Developmental trends of creativity: What twists of turn do boys and girls take at different grades? Creativity Research Journal 22(3) 329-336.

  • Levy B. & Langer E. (1999). Aging. In M. A. Runco & S. R. Pritzker (Eds.) Encyclopedia of Creativity (Vol. 1 pp. 45-52). New York: Academic Press.

  • Lopez E. C. Esquivel G. B. &Houtz J. C. (1993). The creative skills of culturally and linguistically gifted and diverse students. Creativity Research Journal 6 401-412.

  • Lubart T. I. &Lautrey J. (1995). Relationships between creative development and cognitive development. In Paper presented at the 7th European Conference on Developmental Psychology Krakow Poland.

  • Maker C. J. Jo S. & Muammar O. M. (2008). Development of creativity: The influence of varying levels of implementation of the DISCOVER curriculum model. a non-traditional pedagogical approach. Learning and Individual Differences18 402-417.

  • Maker C. J. Jo S. Muammarb O. M. (2008). Development of creativity: The influence of varying levels of implementation of the DISCOVER curriculum model a non-traditional pedagogical approach. Learning and Individual Differences 18 402-417

  • Marchand H. (2012). Contributions of Piagetian and post-Piagetian theories to education Educational Research Review 7 165–176

  • Marcia J. E. (1994). The empirical study of ego identity. In H. A. Bosma & L. G. Tobi (Eds.) Identity and development: An interdisciplinary approach (pp. 67–80). Thousand Oaks. CA: Sage.

  • Marcon R. A. (1995). Fourth-grade slump: The cause and cure. Principal74(5) 16-17.

  • McCrae R. R. Arenberg D. & Costa P. T. (1987). Declines in divergent thinking with age: Cross-sectional. longitudinal. and cross-sequential analyses. Psychology and Aging 2 130-137.

  • Nelson E. E. Guyer A. E. (2011). The development of the ventral prefrontal cortex and social flexibility. Developmental Cognitive Neuroscience 1 233-245

  • Piaget J. (1950). The psychology of intelligence. New York: Harcourt Brace.

  • Piaget J. (1962). Play dreams and imitation in childhood. New York: Norton.

  • Popek S. (2010). Psychologia twórczości plastycznej. Kraków: Wydawnictwo Impuls.

  • Raznahan A. Lee Y. Stidd R. Long R. Greenstein D. Clasen L. Addington A. Gogtay N. Rapoport J. L. & Giedd J. N. (2010). Longitudinally mapping the influence of sex and androgen signaling on the dynamics of human cortical maturation in adolescence. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences107 (39) 16988-16993

  • Romo M. Alfonso-Benlliure & Sánchez-Ruíz M. J. (2008). T.C.I. Test de CreatividadInfantil. Madrid: TEA Ediciones.

  • Rosenblatt E. & Winner E. (1988). The art of children's drawings. Journal of Aesthetic Education22 3-15.

  • Rothenberg A. (1990). Creativity in adolescence. Psychiatric Clinics of North America 13 415–434.

  • Rudowicz E. (2004). Applicability of the Test of Creative Thinking-Drawing Production for Assessing Creative Potential of Hong Kong Adolescents Gifted Child Quarterly 48 3 202-218.

  • Runco M. A. (1991). The evaluative valuative and divergent thinking in children. Journal of Creative Behavior 25 311-319.

  • Runco M. A. (1999). A longitudinal study of exceptional giftedness and creativity. Creativity Research Journal 12 161-164.

  • Runco A. M. & Charles R. E. (1997). Creative potential and performance. In M. A. Runco (Eds.) Creativity Research Handbook (pp. 113-152). Cresskill NJ: Hampton.

  • Sak U. & Maker C. J. (2006). Developmental variation in children’s creative mathematical thinking as a function of schooling age and knowledge. Creativity Research Journal18(3)279-291.

  • Smith G. J. W. & Carlsson I. (1983). Creativity in early and middle school years. International Journal of Behavioral Development6 167-195.

  • Smith G. J. W. & Carlsson I. M. (1985). Creativity in middle and late school years. International Journal of Behavioral Development8 329-343.

  • Smith G. J. & Carlsson I. M. (1990). The creative process: A functional model based on empirical studies from early childhood to middle age. Madison. CT: International Universities Press.

  • Smolucha L. &Smolucha F. (1985). A fifth Piagetian stage: The collaboration between analogical and logical thinking in artistic creativity. Visual Arts Research X 90−99.

  • Spear L. P. (2013). Adolescent neurodevelopment. Journal of Adolescent Health52 S7-S13. doi: 10.1016/j.jadohealth.2012.05.006.

  • Torrance E. P. (1963). Education and the creative potential. Minneapolis MI: University of Minnesota Press.

  • Torrance E. P. (1968). A longitudinal examination of the fourth grade slump in creativity. Gifted Child Quarterly12 195-199.

  • Torrance E. P. (1977). Creativity in the classroom. Washington DC: National Education Association.

  • Urban K. K. (1990). Recent trends in creativity research and theory in Western Europe. European Journal for High Ability 1 99-113.

  • Urban K. K. (1991). On the development of creativity in children. Creativity Research Journal 4 (2) 177-191. DOI: 10.1080/10400419109534384.

  • Urban K. K. (2005). Assessing creativity: The Test for Creative Thinking-Drawing Production (TCT–DP). International Education Journal 6 272–280.

  • Urban K. K. & Jellen H. G. (1996). Test for Creative Thinking-Drawing Production (TCT-DP). Lisse Netherland: Swets and Zeitlinger.

  • Vygotsky L. S. (1930/2004). Imagination and creativity in childhood. Journal of Russian and East European Psychology 42 7-97.

  • Vygotsky L. S. (1931/1991). Imagination and creativity in the adolescent. Soviet Psychology 29 73-88.

  • Vygotsky L. S. (1934/1986). Thought and language. Cambridge MA: MIT Press 1986.

  • Zabelina D. L. O’Leary D. Pornpattananangkul N. Nusslock R. & Beeman M. (2015). Creativity and sensory gating indexed by the P50: Selective versus leaky sensory gating in divergent thinkers and creative achievers. Neuropsychologia 69 77-84.

  • Zedelius C. M. & Schooler J. W. (2015). Mind wandering “Ahas” versus mindful reasoning: alternative routes to creative solutions. Frontiers in Psychology 6 834. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2015.00834.

Journal information
Cited By
All Time Past Year Past 30 Days
Abstract Views 0 0 0
Full Text Views 469 154 3
PDF Downloads 195 83 2