Development of the Creative Self-Concept

Maciej Karwowski 1
  • 1 Department of Educational Sciences, The Maria Grzegorzewska University, 40 Szczesliwicka St., 02-353 Warsaw, Poland


Although the creative self-concept is more and more intensively studied in the creativity literature, little is known about its developmental characteristics. In three studies presented in this paper, several hypotheses concerning the development of the creative self-concept are tested. Specifically examined are hypotheses regarding the growing specificity and clarity of the creative self-concept during development (Studies 1 and 2) and changes in it during the lifespan (Study 3).The results show that although the creative selfconcept is formed at about 10 years of age, by 12 years old it remains somewhat poorly clarified. Changes in the creative self-concept are observed mainly in the transition period between late adolescence and early adulthood (when it grows) and medium and late adulthood (when it diminishes). Creativity - a specific interplay between imagination, improvisation, and innovation

If the inline PDF is not rendering correctly, you can download the PDF file here.

  • Amabile, T. M. (1996). Creativity in Context. Boulder, CO: Westview Press.

  • Bandura, A. (1997). Self-efficacy: The exercise of control. New York: Freeman

  • Bandura, A. (1986). Social foundations of thought and action: A social cognitive theory. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.

  • Barron, F. & Harrington, D. M. (1981). Creativity, intelligence and personality. Annual Review of Psychology, 32, 439-476.

  • Beghetto, R. A. (2006). Creative self-efficacy: Correlates in middle and secondary students. Creativity Research Journal, 18, 447-457.

  • Beghetto, R. A. (2013). Killing ideas softly? The promise and perils of creativity in the classroom. Charlotte: Information Age Processing.

  • Beghetto, R. A. (2014). Is the sky falling or expanding? A promising turning point in the psychology of creativity. Creativity. Theories – Research - Applications, 1, 206-213.

  • Beghetto, R. A., Baer, J. & Kaufman, J. C. (2015). Teaching for creativity in the common core classroom. New York: Teachers College.

  • Beghetto, R. A. & Plucker, J. A. (2006). The relationship among schooling, learning, and creativity: "All roads lead to creativity" or "You can't get there from here"? In J. C. Kaufman & J. Bear (Eds.). Creativity and reason in cognitive development (pp. 316-332). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.

  • Cropley, A. J. (2010). Creativity in the classroom: The dark side. In A. J. Cropley, J. C. Kaufman & M. A. Runco (Eds.). The dark side of creativity (pp. 297-315). New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.

  • Eccles, J. (1983). Expectancies, values and academic behaviors. In J. T. Spence (Ed.). Achievement and achievement motives (pp. 75-146). San Francisco: Freeman.

  • Flammer, A. (1995). Developmental analysis of control beliefs. In A. Bandura (Ed.), Selfefficacy in changing societies (pp. 69-114). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.

  • Gralewski, J. & Karwowski, M. (2012). Creativity and school grades: A case from Poland. Thinking Skills and Creativity, 7, 198-208.

  • Gralewski, J. & Karwowski, M. (2013). Polite girls and creative boys? Students' gender moderates accuracy of teachers' ratings of creativity. Journal of Creative Behavior, 47, 290-304.

  • Gralewski, J. & Karwowski, M. (in press). Are teachers’ implicit theories of creativity related to the recognition of their students’ creativity? Journal of Creative Behavior.

  • Harter, S. (1985). Competence as a dimension of self-evaluation: Toward a comprehensive model of self-worth. In R. Leahy (Ed.). The development of the self (pp. 55-121). NY: Academic Press.

  • Harter, S. (1986). Processes underlying the construction, maintenance, and enhancement of the self-concept in children. In J. Suls & A. G. Greenwald (Eds.). Psychological perspectives on the self (Vol. 3). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.

  • Harter, S. (1990). Causes, correlates and the functional role of global self-worth: A lifespan perspective. In J. Kolligan & R. J. Sternberg (Eds.). Perceptions of competence and incompetence across the life span (pp. 67-98). New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.

  • Hennessey, B. (2015). Comment on “The Psychology of Creativity: A Critical Reading” by Vlad Petre Glăveanu. Creativity. Theories – Research - Applications, 2, 32-37.

  • Hu, L. T. & Bentler, P. M. (1999). Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis: Conventional criteria versus new alternatives. Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 6, 1-55.;

  • Karwowski, M. (2007). Teachers` nominations of students` creativity: Should we believe them? Are the nominations valid? Social Sciences, 2, 264-269.

  • Karwowski, M. (2009). I’m creative, but am I Creative? Similarities and differences between self-evaluated small and Big C creativity in Poland. International Journal of Creativity and Problem Solving, 19, 7-26.

  • Karwowski, M. (2011). It doesn’t hurt to ask... But sometimes it hurts to believe. Predictors of Polish students’ creative self-efficacy. Psychology of Aesthetics, Creativity and the Arts, 5, 154-164.

  • Karwowski, M. (2012). Did curiosity kill the cat? Relationship between trait curiosity, creative self-efficacy and creative personal identity. Europe’s Journal of Psychology, 8, 547-558.

  • Karwowski, M. (2014). Creative mindset: Measurement, correlates, consequences. Psychology of Aesthetics, Creativity, and the Arts, 8, 62-70.

  • Karwowski, M. (in press). Dynamic of the creative self-concept: Changes and reciprocal relations between creative self-efficacy and creative personal identity. Creativity Research Journal.

  • Karwowski, M. & Barbot, B. (2016). Self-beliefs and creativity in developmental context. In J. C. Kaufman & J. Baer (Eds.). Cambridge companion to creativity in reason and development. New York: Cambridge University Press.

  • Karwowski, M., Gralewski, J. & Szumski, G. (2015). Teachers’ effect on students’ creative self-concept is moderated by students’ gender. Learning and Individual Differences. Advance online publication, 44, 1-8.

  • Karwowski, M. & Lebuda, I. (2015). Big Five, Huge Two, and creative self-beliefs: A meta -analysis. Psychology of Aesthetics, Creativity, and the Arts, Online First Publication, October 19, 2015.

  • Karwowski, M. & Lebuda, I. (in press). Creative Self-Concept: A surface characteristic of creative personality. In G. Feist, R. Reiter-Palmon & J. C. Kaufman (Eds.). Cambridge handbook of creativity and personality. New York: Cambridge University Press.

  • Karwowski, M., Lebuda, I., Wisniewska, E. & Gralewski, J. (2013). Big Five personality factors as the predictors of creative self-efficacy and creative personal identity: Does gender matter? Journal of Creative Behavior, 47, 215-232.

  • Kaufman, J. C. & Beghetto, R. A. (2009). Beyond big and little: The four C model of creativity. Review of General Psychology, 13, 1-12.

  • Kaufman, J. C. & Beghetto, R. A. (2013). In praise of Clark Kent: Creative metacognition and the importance of teaching kids when (not) to be creative. Roeper Review, 35, 155-165.

  • Kline, R. B. (2011). Principles and practice of structural equation modeling. New York: Guilford Press.

  • Krampen, G. (2012). Cross-sequential results on creativity development in childhood within two different school systems: Divergent performances in Luxembourg versus German kindergarten and elementary school students. Europe’s Journal of Psychology, 8, 423-448.

  • Ligeza, W. (2005). Rozwoj reprezentacji poznawczej tworczosci u dzieci w wieku od 4 do 10 lat (The development of cognitive representations of creativity among children aged 4-10). Unpublished doctoral dissertation. Krakow: Jagiellonian University.

  • Muthén, L. K. & Muthén, B. O. (1998-2014). Mplus user's guide. Seventh edition. Los Angeles, CA: Muthén & Muthén.

  • Nickerson, R. S. (2010). How to discourage creative thinking in the classroom. In R. A. Beghetto & James C. Kaufman (Eds.). Nurturing Creativity in the Classroom (pp. 1-6). New York: Cambridge University Press.

  • Piaget, J. (1936). Origins of intelligence in the child. London: Routledge & Kegan Paul.

  • Rostan, S. M. (1998). A study of the development of young artists: The emergence of on artistic and creative identity. Journal of Creative Behavior, 32, 278-301.

  • Sawyer, R. K. (2006). Educating for innovation. Thinking Skills and Creativity,1, 41-48.

  • Scott, C. L. (1999). Teachers' biases toward creative children. Creativity Research Journal, 12, 321-328.

  • Simonton, D. K. (1988). Age and outstanding achievement: What do we know after a century of research? Psychological Bulletin, 104, 251-267.

  • Torrance, E. P. (1968). A longitudinal examination of the fourth grade slump in creativity. Gifted Child Quarterly, 12, 195-199.

  • Wellman, H. M., Cross, D. & Watson, J. (2001). Meta‐analysis of theory‐of‐mind development: the truth about false belief. Child Development, 72, 655-684.

  • Westby, E. L. & Dawson, V. L. (1995). Creativity: Asset or burden in the classroom? Creativity Research Journal, 8, 1-10.

  • White, R. W. (1959). Motivation reconsidered: The concept of competence. Psychological Review, 66, 297-333.

  • Wigfield, A. & Eccles, J. S. (2000). Expectancy-value theory of achievement motivation. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 25, 68-81.

  • Wigfield, A., Eccles, J. S., Yoon, K. S., Harold, R. D., Arbreton, A., et al. (1997). Changes in children’s competence beliefs and subjective task values across the elementary school years: a three-year study. Journal of Educational Psychology, 89, 451-69.

  • Yu, C.Y. (2002). Evaluating cutoff criteria of model fit indices for latent variable models with binary and continuous outcomes. Doctoral dissertation, University of California, Los Angeles.


Journal + Issues