Macroeconomic effects of the budget deficit in the Republic of Macedonia

Open access

Abstract

Although a decade has passed since the global financial and economic crisis of 2008, the expansionary fiscal policy in Macedonia can still be felt, primarily through an increased level of public expenditures aimed at stimulation of the economic growth. From 2008 onwards, the Republic of Macedonia has continuously recorded a negative budget balance, which affects the resources allocation and the overall economic situation. The question that arises is whether such interference by the Government in the functioning of the market economy is necessary, especially having in mind the EU regulation in this area. Using a multiple regression model for the period 1996-2015, this paper examines the impact of the budget deficit on Gross Domestic Product (GDP) per capita in Macedonia. Results show that the budget deficit is not a statistically significant determinant of GDP per capita, supporting thus the Ricardian equivalence theory. The analysis is conducted on the basis of statistical data from the World Bank’s database, as well as data from the National Bank of the Republic of Macedonia. Household final consumption expenditure, the unemployment rate and the official exchange rate of the Macedonian Denar against the U.S. Dollar are also taken into consideration as controlling variables. GDP per capita and household final consumption expenditures are in current prices, with natural logarithms applied, whereas the other variables are in nominal terms. The purpose of this paper is to provide an insight into the empirical relationship between the two main variables of interest and to initiate further discussion and analysis.

If the inline PDF is not rendering correctly, you can download the PDF file here.

  • 1. Barro R. J. (1989). The Ricardian Approach to Budget Deficits. Journal of Economic Perspectives Vol. 3 No. 2 pp. 37-54.

  • 2. Barry F. G. Devereux M. B. (1992). Crowding Out Effects of Government Spending. The Economic and Social Review Vol. 23 No. 3 pp. 199-221.

  • 3. Baumohl E. Lyocsa S. (2009). Stationarity of time series and the problem of spurious regression. MPRA Paper No. 27926 pp. 1-16. Available at http://mpra.ub.unimuenchen.de/27926/ [10 May 2018].

  • 4. Bergman U. M. Hutchinson M. (2010). Expansionary Fiscal Contractions: Re-evaluating the Danish Case. International Economic Journal Vol. 24 No. 1 pp. 71-93.

  • 5. Bernheim B. D. (1989). A Neoclassical Perspective on Budget Deficits. Journal of Economic Perspectives Vol. 3 No. 2 pp. 55-72.

  • 6. Briotti M. G. (2005). Economic Reactions to Public Finance Consolidation: A Survey of the Literature. European Central Bank Occasional Paper Series No. 38 pp. 1-31.

  • 7. Eisner R. (1989). Budget Deficits: Rhetoric and Reality. Journal of Economic Perspectives Vol. 3 No. 2 pp. 73-93.

  • 8. Fatima G. Ahmed M. Rehman W. (2012). Consequential Effects of Budget Deficit on Economic Growth of Pakistan. International Journal of Business and Social Science Vol. 3 No. 7 pp. 203-208.

  • 9. Giavazzi F. Pagano M. (1990). Can Severe Fiscal Contractions Be Expansionary? Tales of Two Small European Countries. NBER Macroeconomics Annual Vol. 5 pp. 75-122. Available at http://www.nber.org/chapters/c10973 [10 May 2018].

  • 10. Giudice G. Turrini A. Veld J. (2003). Can fiscal consolidations be expansionary in the EU? Ex-post evidence and ex-ante analysis. European Economy - Economic Papers No. 195 pp. 1-35.

  • 11. Gujarati D. N. Porter D. C. (2009). Basic Econometrics. McGraw-Hill/Irwin New York.

  • 12. Gurgul H. Lach L. (2012). Two Deficits and Economic Growth: Case of CEE Countries in Transition. AGH Managerial Economics No. 12 pp. 79-108.

  • 13. Hubbard G. (2012). Consequences of Government Deficits and Debt. International Journal of Central Banking Vol. 8 No. S1 pp. 203-235.

  • 14. Ministry of Finance of the Republic of Macedonia (2017). Stock of debt (% of GDP). Available at https://www.finance.gov.mk/en/node/2678 [10 May 2018].

  • 15. Nayab H. (2015). The Relationship between Budget Deficit and Economic Growth of Pakistan. Journal of Economics and Sustainable Development Vol. 6 No. 11 pp. 85-90.

  • 16. Saleh A. S. (2003). The Budget Deficit and Economic Performance: A Survey. Department of Economics University of Wollongong Working Paper 03-12 pp. 1-56. Available at http://ro.uow.edu.au/commwkpapers/78 [10 May 2018].

  • 17. National Bank of the Republic of Macedonia (2017). Basic economic data. Available at http://nbrm.mk/osnovni_ekonomski_pokazateli-en.nspx [10 May 2018].

  • 18. Tas R. (1992). Theoretical and Empirical Aspects of Budget Deficits. Ankara University Faculty of Political Sciences Journal Vol. 47 No. 3 pp. 327-341.

  • 19. Tešić A. Ilić D. Đelić A. T. (2014). Consequences of Fiscal Deficit and Public Debt in Financing the Public Sector. Economics of Agriculture Vol. 61 No. 1 pp. 177-194.

  • 20. Trenovski B. Tashevska B. (2016). Fiscal Sustainability in Macedonia on its path towards EU. MPRA Paper No. 76321 pp. 1-16. Available at https://mpra.ub.uni-muenchen.de/76321/ [10 May 2018].

  • 21. World Bank (2017). Time series indicators for the Republic of Macedonia. Available at https://data.worldbank.org/country/macedonia-fyr?view=chart [10 May 2018].

Search
Journal information
Metrics
All Time Past Year Past 30 Days
Abstract Views 0 0 0
Full Text Views 120 120 6
PDF Downloads 68 68 0